In the past I have used segments set to "visit" to see the impact a URL has to form complete or other events. From what I understand, this is participation within a "session/visit" (meaning that for "x" page visits where someone in a session visited page "x", and then also had a form complete in the same session).
I see that Attribution IQ can help me take a more simple approach than creating a segment for every URL I view in this way. Instead, I can create a table, and then select the type of attribution to use.
However, I'm seeing that when I use Attribution IQ in this way, the data I see for visit base participation attribution is not providing the same number as a visit based segment for the same time period.
Can someone explain how I can arrive to the same number? Or help me understand why I'm not arriving to the same number?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Topics help categorize Community content and increase your ability to discover relevant content.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Thanks again @Jennifer_Dungan for hopping on a call and working through this with me.
Jennifer and I did some tests on segments to see where the Attribution IQ setting of "Participation+Visit" lines up with page/URL based segments. We found that the main difference is that when you make a simple "URL-based" segment, you are giving attribution to an event regardless of whether the URL was visited before or after the conversion event.
However, Attribution IQ "Participation+Visit" matches exactly agains segments that are visit based, but also sequential (ex: url then event with the "after the sequence" selected"). This matches exactly. See the below screenshot.
Hi, to try and get clarity around what you are reporting on... what is the relationship of the URL to the Form Completion?
Is the form on that URL? Is the URL recorded when the page loads, and again when the form is completed? Is this URL recorded on other potential actions?
When I attempt to use Participation modelling, the attribution is higher than the actual metrics collected.... This is because the attribution is picking up all recorded instances of that URL for Visits / Visitors that triggered the event (in your case they are smaller, but without knowing your datasets it will be hard to pinpoint exactly why you are seeing the values you are seeing).
Where you are using segments, even if you are pulling Visits or Visitors that hit your URL, you are still looking at actual form completions... However, depending on how your segments are built, there could be potential inflation there... I can't actually see your segments.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hello @Jennifer_Dungan (forgot to at mention you),
Thanks for the reply! Here is another image with the missing information.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
OK, so the form complete is on the same page as the form, and I would suspect the URL is also tracked on the page, so the attribution model would be picking those page views (before the form completion) into the attribution as I suspected.
In this case, the attribution model isn't ideal for what you are trying to achieve.
If it were me (and often I do similar things), I would use the segment method where I have more control.
I do use Attribution IQ, but for different purposes.. such as looking at the participation of Marketing Channels over 30 days against purchases... so that I can see all the drivers instead of just the last touch (when needed of course, last touch is still the strongest association to the marketing channel, but it's good to look at multiple angles)
Views
Replies
Total Likes
So, the best way to see page/URL attribution to a conversion event that is likely not on the list of URL's (ex: see a homepage's CR impact to a form complete that occurs downstream in the journey), it is still better to use a "visit" based segment.
And that, there is not an Attribution model that will allow this to be seen more easily in a simple table.
This means, that I will need to create a segment for each URL I want to analyze in this way.
So, if someone asks "what page impact CR the most aside from the form page itself?", I will need to either make a segment for each URL on the site, or, use page groups first to get a higher converting group of pages, and then whittle it down from there.
If I understand correctly .
What in your opinion then is the best use of the Attribution model that you have used it for if not for conversion events on the site?
Views
Replies
Total Likes
I do use Attribution for conversions on the site..
As I said, I generally use Attribution IQ on Marketing Channels or Internal Campaigns to see all touch points as opposed to the last touch. Or I use Attribution IQ to get a longer attribution model on the above (Marketing Channels in my set up are set to 7 days, Internal Campaigns are at the visit level - but I may want to see a longer window such as 1 month, or more)
You never really answered my question about
Is the form on that URL? Is the URL recorded when the page loads, and again when the form is completed? Is this URL recorded on other potential actions?
If you are not tracking the URL on form complete, then maybe the Attribution IQ is de-duplicating the same page leading to multiple form submissions.
Without fully understanding your implementation, it is very hard for me to tell you the exact criteria to get the data you need.
I can tell you this though, in my implementation, I track the URLs on ALL hits (the page, the form completion, etc), so I don't need either the segment or Attribution IQ to see what page the form was submitted on... I can literally just look at URL and the Form Completed metric nothing else required....
If you are tracking the URL on the form submission, then try just that simple correlation... if you are not, then yes, you need to do something to stitch the page view to the form completion... however, in both the attribution IQ and the Visit segment, you have nothing explicitly connecting the form completion to that specific URL.....
Let's say you have 3 forms on Page A, Page B and Page C
Your Visit segment for "Page A" will still return as true, even though the submission was on Page B, because you are only looking for Page A in the visit (so your segment is likely inflated on closer inspection)
However, you Attribution IQ may not be much better, since you are looking at Participation and not just "last touch"... the Attribution IQ is probably pulling back Page A and Page B as both pages were participating pages leading to a Form Completion.
I only have partial information to work on here, so it's easy to miss something or mis-interpret what you are showing/telling me...
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hello @Jennifer_Dungan ,
Sorry, here answers to your questions:
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Thanks again @Jennifer_Dungan for hopping on a call and working through this with me.
Jennifer and I did some tests on segments to see where the Attribution IQ setting of "Participation+Visit" lines up with page/URL based segments. We found that the main difference is that when you make a simple "URL-based" segment, you are giving attribution to an event regardless of whether the URL was visited before or after the conversion event.
However, Attribution IQ "Participation+Visit" matches exactly agains segments that are visit based, but also sequential (ex: url then event with the "after the sequence" selected"). This matches exactly. See the below screenshot.
It was a pleasure working with you @Damonwhall and I'm glad we sorted out the issue.
Views
Replies
Total Likes