Your achievements

Level 1

0% to

Level 2

Tip /
Sign in

Sign in to Community

to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new
Bedrock Mission!

Learn more

View all

Sign in to view all badges

RegEx for processing rules

Avatar

Avatar
Boost 50
Level 4
tbolle
Level 4

Likes

52 likes

Total Posts

3 posts

Correct reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Boost 50
Boost 5
Boost 3
Boost 25
Boost 10
View profile

Avatar
Boost 50
Level 4
tbolle
Level 4

Likes

52 likes

Total Posts

3 posts

Correct reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Boost 50
Boost 5
Boost 3
Boost 25
Boost 10
View profile
tbolle
Level 4

13-01-2013

You should let us be able to use Regex for setting up conditions for processing rules. We have dynamic URL's and this would make it much easier to to have the rules run correctly.

7 Comments

Avatar

Avatar
Applaud 5
Level 1
lucyg98085
Level 1

Likes

0 likes

Total Posts

1 post

Correct reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Applaud 5
Applaud 25
View profile

Avatar
Applaud 5
Level 1
lucyg98085
Level 1

Likes

0 likes

Total Posts

1 post

Correct reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Applaud 5
Applaud 25
View profile
lucyg98085
Level 1

28-01-2013

This would help us also so that we can pull in the value of a subdirectory in a url.

Avatar

Avatar
Level 1
jnarong
Level 1

Likes

0 likes

Total Posts

1 post

Correct reply

0 solutions
View profile

Avatar
Level 1
jnarong
Level 1

Likes

0 likes

Total Posts

1 post

Correct reply

0 solutions
View profile
jnarong
Level 1

16-03-2015

Within the interface for Processing Rules, it would be great to allow regex conditional statements instead of just the generic ones currently available (contains, equals, does not contain, etc.)

Avatar

Avatar
Give Back
Level 2
salernoam29
Level 2

Likes

16 likes

Total Posts

34 posts

Correct reply

1 solution
Top badges earned
Give Back
Boost 5
Boost 3
Boost 10
Boost 1
View profile

Avatar
Give Back
Level 2
salernoam29
Level 2

Likes

16 likes

Total Posts

34 posts

Correct reply

1 solution
Top badges earned
Give Back
Boost 5
Boost 3
Boost 10
Boost 1
View profile
salernoam29
Level 2

08-08-2016

This would be very useful right now to set one prop equal to part of another.

Avatar

Avatar
Employee
BretGundy
Employee

Likes

0 likes

Total Posts

99 posts

Correct reply

0 solutions
View profile

Avatar
Employee
BretGundy
Employee

Likes

0 likes

Total Posts

99 posts

Correct reply

0 solutions
View profile
BretGundy
Employee

11-08-2016

We've considered this many times, but have found that a full regex engine could add processing delays. Is it fair to say that the key points of regex are the following?

 

  • Match a pattern, including wildcards, number and alpha-character matching
  • Replace some portion of the string with something
  • Extract a portion of the stirng for use elsewhere

Avatar

Avatar
Establish
Employee
ericmatisoff
Employee

Likes

156 likes

Total Posts

287 posts

Correct reply

79 solutions
Top badges earned
Establish
Give Back 200
Give Back 100
Give Back 50
Coach
View profile

Avatar
Establish
Employee
ericmatisoff
Employee

Likes

156 likes

Total Posts

287 posts

Correct reply

79 solutions
Top badges earned
Establish
Give Back 200
Give Back 100
Give Back 50
Coach
View profile
ericmatisoff
Employee

11-08-2016

I'd say it'd be super helpful for IP-based processing rules (a la http://ideas.omniture.com/t5/Idea-Exchange-for-Adobe/Add-Regular-Expression-type-feature-t o-Processing-Rules/idi-p/5067). The current string-based Processing Rule options make it very difficult to deal with IP ranges.

Avatar

Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 9
Josh_Du
Level 9

Likes

275 likes

Total Posts

241 posts

Correct reply

70 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 100
Give Back 50
Give Back 25
View profile

Avatar
Ignite 3
Level 9
Josh_Du
Level 9

Likes

275 likes

Total Posts

241 posts

Correct reply

70 solutions
Top badges earned
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
Give Back 100
Give Back 50
Give Back 25
View profile
Josh_Du
Level 9

22-12-2017

bretgundy

There's already an expectation of delay on data availability in reports (except for real-time reports, which let's be honest here, are of limited value to begin with).

Also, I'm pretty sure VISTA rules are able to use regex, yes?

Regex support for various things within AA (filters, segments, PRs, etc.) has been a long-standing request from many people, that other tools (e.g. GA) handle just fine.  The fact that AA continues to have limited to no regex support after all these years is rather mind boggling, and yeah, I'll be the one to address the elephant in the room: the problem isn't with regex: it's with the devs.

Avatar

Avatar
Give Back 50
Level 6
alv123456
Level 6

Likes

71 likes

Total Posts

118 posts

Correct reply

4 solutions
Top badges earned
Give Back 50
Ignite 40
Ignite 30
Give Back 25
Ignite 20
View profile

Avatar
Give Back 50
Level 6
alv123456
Level 6

Likes

71 likes

Total Posts

118 posts

Correct reply

4 solutions
Top badges earned
Give Back 50
Ignite 40
Ignite 30
Give Back 25
Ignite 20
View profile
alv123456
Level 6

23-07-2018

Very important feature missing! Soemtimes we want to remove some specific query string parameters and we cannot do that right now without throwing away the complete query string.