Please bring this back. When users go on leave, I no longer have any way of accessing their reports. This is a huge problem.

Let's say I have 3 mutually exclusive segments that comprize 70% of my visitors:Group 1, Group 2, Group 3 Currently, if I want to also look at the other 30%, everyone else, I make a visitor segment that excludes Group 1 OR Group 2 OR Group 3. This works for basic things, but as my groups get more complex or more numerous, making those Exclude segments gets very intensive. Then I end up with 4 segments: Group 1, Group 2, Group 3, Other. For my particular situation, I'd like to be able to just hig...

Thanks for the update!  I'm egerly awaiting this release!

It would be awesome if we could get flexablility with the Everyone Else/Other functionality, possibly combining these two ideas http://ideas.omniture.com/t5/Idea-Exchange-for-Adobe/Analytics-Workspace-automatically-add -quot-other-quot-line/idi-p/16521

This would be amazing. I am constantly making exclusive "Other" segments, and they can become very process-intensive to build when they are comprised of other excluded segments. (A few I could only create in Ad Hoc, otherwise the Workspace Segment Builder freezes).

@JenlasserWould #1 apply to segment rows too? For #2, it would get rather tedious if we have many dimension values, but in general, manual reordering would be a decent stopgap for many of our problems. The manual reordering would need to be able to be "locked" once we set the order, because it seems like often the items get reordered if the data gets re-ranked when it is refreshed. I'm going to keep hinting until maybe it gets implemented: Can we just have a table builder in Ad Hoc? Please?

@benjamingaines the auto-save is not working at all anymore, it seems. I had to step away from my laptop while a table was querying. When I came back, it said it auto-saved (and had the completed table) but when I logged back in, the recent changes were gone.

This would be very useful right now to set one prop equal to part of another.

In a perfect world, having one read-only option that locks down the date range *and* one that allows date range modification would be great. If I had to pick, I'd go for totally locked down first, since I have multiple reports that wouldn't handle random date range changes well.

@TyranalysisRex, I was just thinking about this as I took Analysis Workspace through its paces with one of our more complex dashboards! (PS, clever handle)

@Dan_Ellis1, you read my mind. Glad I found your post as I was making my own about this and a few other related reasons why I'd like to see the table builder from Ad Hoc make it's way to Workspace. I too have wished there was an option to order the dimension in ascending/descending value in all of the analysis tools when working with custom prop/eVar dimensions that have numeric values.

Yes. In my opinion, the updated totals are useful on their own, regardless of the impact to mean/max/min logic. Any notation would be a bonus.

I want to revitalize this idea. Making it report specific would be fantastic. At the very least, please make it project specific! We have had many a heart attack after working on one project with repeat instances turned off (for a flow), only to open a saved report and have our numbers look like they are way lower than the last time we opened it, since repeat instnaces are still turned off, even though that project was last saved with them on. This has been a big thorn for us, and it looks like ...

@benjamingaines hmm... I hadn't thought about that. Usually when I search filter results, I end up with multiple by way of a contains, in which case it would be a little odd. But it totally makes sense if you only have one result. Could there be a way to automatically notate that the min/max/mean still are based on the grand total when a search filter is applied?

Also in Ad Hoc! This has caused big issues in the past where people erroneously grab the overall total when they think they are grabbing the total of the filters.

Great news!