Description
- Sorting for bucketed dimensions in CJA should default to logical sorting by the dimension's numerical value, rather than it's label.
- Buckets should be displayed more clearly (Less than 30, 30 to 59, 60 to 119, 120 or more)
Why is this feature important to you
- Bucketed dimensions are intuitively understood when sorted in logical order by the value of the dimension. For example, shortest to longest time.
- It's confusing when two buckets are ambiguously defined and contain the same value (example: 30 to 60, 60 to 120).
How would you like the feature to work
- Bucketed dimensions should default to logical sorting by the dimensions numerical value. At a minimum, users should have the option to sort by logical order.
Example: If I have a bucketed dimension for time in seconds (Less than 30, 30-60, 60-120, 120 or more), I'd like the option to sort them logically as either:
Less than 30, 30 to 60, 60 to 120, 120 or more, or
120 or more, 60 to 120, 30 to 60, Less than 30
- Bucket ranges should be clearly displayed (without any overlap)
Current Behavior
- Sorting by the bucketed dimension sorts by non-intuitive, alpha-numeric orders either:
Less than 30, 60 to 120, 30 to 60, 120 or more, or
120 or more, 30 to 60, 60 to 120, Less than 30
- Bucket ranges overlap (30 to 60, 60 to 120, 120 or more), causing confusion.
