Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: I have implemented permission-based caching for our secure site. The site will perform user authentication before serving any secure content. I have followed the document for configurations and implementation-https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/dispatcher/permissions-cache.html For initial request/cached content not available, the Dispatcher directly calls AEM resulting in displaying the secure page without authentication. Use-case: Use Case 1: The user must be authenticated via the Dispatcher Auth Checker Servlet before serving secure content. Use Case 2: If the user's authentication via the Dispatcher Auth Checker Servlet fails, the dispatcher will not forward the original request to AEM. Current/Experienced Behavior: Current Behaviour for Use Case 1: When the requested content is not cached, the Dispatcher Auth Checker sends the request directly to the AEM publisher for page rendering, allowing the user to access secure content without authentication. Current Behaviour for Use Case 2: If user authentication fails, the dispatcher forwards the original request to the AEM publisher for page rendering without authentication. Improved/Expected Behavior: Expected Behaviour for Use Case 1: The user must be authenticated via the Dispatcher Auth Checker Servlet before serving secure content.Expected Behaviour for Use Case 2: If the user's authentication via the Dispatcher Auth Checker Servlet fails, the dispatcher should not forward the original request to AEM. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Release - 2024.8.17465.20240813T175259Z Customer-name/Organization name: Boston Scientific (BSC) Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): @gurjotsingh @akashramchandani
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: I have implemented the composite Multifield in Content Fragment by referencing https://jimfrenette.com/aem/content-fragments/composite-multifield In this implementation, we have added custom Client-Libs for composite multifield and show/hide target functionality based on dropdown selection. These custom Client-Libs are loading correctly and working as expected in the old content editor. However, in the new content editor, the custom Client-Libs are not loading, causing the functionality to break. Use-case: We have a dropdown, and on 3rd selection of the dropdown, multifield should show, and min value of multifield is 1 and max value is 5 Current/Experienced Behavior: When we open a new content fragment editor multifield is not getting hidden and giving a warning to add at least one item, as custom Client-Libs not loading Improved/Expected Behavior: In the New content fragment editor dropdown show/hide should work and also on the dropdown selection multifield items should show, Whereas in the old content fragment editor custom client libs are loading hence on the dropdown multifield is hiding and didn't get a warning Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Release - 2024.8.17569.20240822T203847Z Customer-name/Organization name: Bosten Scientific (BSC) Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): @indrajitsi @gurjotsingh
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Log Forwarding Option available for Amazon CloudWatch Use-case: Our client is using internally Amazon CloudWatch https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cloudwatch/ for all applications and would like to use that solution as well for AEM logfiles. I am well aware that AEM supports logforwarding using Splunk. On recent documentation https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/log-forwarding more logging destinations are documented. In case this will be part of an early adopter program, our client is interested in participating. Current/Experienced Behavior: No options are available for Amazon CloudWatch logforwarding Improved/Expected Behavior: An option will be made available Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Valtech. (Client doesn't want to be named in public) Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Here are some feature enhancments, these can be together or even just one of these implemented would solve a lot of problems 1.) Allow the selection of artifacts to deploy to production as one of the steps before deploying to production 2.) Decouple Stage and Production deployment pipeline. Ability to deploy to Prod independently of deployment to stage 3.) Ability to start at production deployment simply by selecting previously built artifacts instead of having to start every time at the beginning of the pipeline. Use-case: Our product can contain ~171 modules which crashes the Adobe CM pipeline running the server out of resources. If the production publishers are overloaded the CM deployment fails to just one publisher it aborts the entire deployment. In the above use cases if we can start from where we left off, or select the artifacts and maybe remove failing artifacts without starting over at the beginning of the pipeline that would improve efficiency. Sometimes ou CM pipeline runs for 12 hours while it builds and deploys to production Current/Experienced Behavior: Unable to deploy to production and lack of robust pipelines Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to deploy to stage and prod in parallel. Ability to select artifacts to deploy to production without starting hte entire pipeline over again. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.21 Customer-name/Organization name: N/A Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hello, within a Workfront project there is the ability to minimize the parent task with the carat so that it pulls in all of the tasks below it and hides them within the minimized task. This helps to make the project smaller and hide the amount of tasks that are in there in order to navigate to the tasks that are still open. When logging out of Workfront, it removes the tabs that you minimized in each project forcing you to have to go and click all of those again in order to make the project more manageable. For example, if there are 5 months of content that you are providing to a client, and you want to minimize the first 3 months of it since you are already done with those tasks, this makes the project smaller so you can quickly look at the tasks that are still remaining. I would love for there to be a way to "Pin" the parent tasks after you minimize them so that every time you enter the project it is easier to navigate within it, instead of having to manually minimize the parent tasks each time.
When setting calendar availability in Dynamic Chat you can only choose availability by day of the week, this request is to enable controlling availability by specific dates i.e. instead of choosing every monday you can specify which mondays you are available
I would like to see increased filter functionality in the Assigned Work area of the Workload Balancer to include AND and OR statements.This would allow Assigned Work filters to pull tasks from a specific Portfolio (Client A) and for a specific Job Role (Strategic Planner).For example, we are trying to see all Client A's tasks assigned to a Strategic Planner. However, there can be different Strategic Planners supporting Client A's work so we cannot set the filter to specific USER IDS as this would be too limiting.Currently, when filtering Client A's tasks assigned to Strategic Planners, it lists all Strategic Planners even those that have have no Client A tasks. So there are many Strategic Planners showing with zero Planned Hours or empty rows.I would like to filter out those Strategic Planners with zero Planned Hours or empty rows for a specific Client or Portfolio but that functionality is not possible at this time.
Description - Workfront uses a banner functionality to let customers know that they are approaching their annual contract renewal date. Why is this feature important to you - There are announcements that as a system admin I would like to share across our Workfront instance as a banner for all users to see. How would you like the feature to work - For Workfront to offer the banner functionality to the customer facing side of the application for system admins to use to share out information as a banner across the top of all Workfront pages. Current Behaviour - Customers can send Announcements or Notifications that trigger an email or can be viewed via the Notification icon in the upper-right corner of the Workfront interface but there is not a banner functionality that would be visible to users from any page in Workfront.
The "Updates" tab of a project should serve as a feed of all activity - including comments made on proofs related to the project. Currently, you have to look in multiple places to get the full picture of what's going on.
If we can attach a custom form to each issue as we can do today, I want to be able to attach a custom form to each document uploaded so the user can fill up additional information for the document. Hopefully, this can be turned on/off as needed per project or issue.
Description - We would appreciate advance notice of when a new version of the Proof Viewer app is released.Why is this feature important to you - Our users are not able to install the update themselves due to security reasons and the app must be packaged and deployed by our IT department. Without notification, we rely on the users to inform Admin team when a new version has been released which causes a delay in the new version being available to our users.How would you like the feature to work - Our IT and Admin team receives notification which allows them to package and deploy the update proactively so users are not impacted.Current behavior - When a new version of the app is released, users get a pop-up window when they are proofing alerting them to a new version. The pop-up window is persistent and needs to be dismissed multiple times and impacts their ability to work.
This is a pretty simple optimization, but I would love to be able to just click on a smart list and see how many people there are just like in a static list or smart campaign. Just having it appear somewhere in the "Status" tab. Having to click on the "People" tab in a smart list and wait for all the leads/contact information to load when I just need a number seems unnecessary.
Current situation: when releasing assets to my stakeholders, on the Open Summary pane, the comment window (where I tag my stakeholder) appears only when I select I document. Problem/solution: The comment window (where I tag my stakeholder) doesn't appear when I select multiple documents Solution: To have the comment window appearing when I select multiple documents so that I can generate 1 notification (1 link) that includes all the documents on the same Asset Release folder. Is this possible?
Hi, I would like a feature to create 1 proof by combining multiple documents. I can do this in ProofHQ however I have not been able to do this in Workfront. Thanks, Emma
If users can delegate work objects in Workfront they need a way to see those objects from their Home Page. The legacy Home let you apply a Delegated to Me Delagated by Me filter. It would be useful to have a My Delegated Tasks widget for the new Home.
It would be awesome if users could add reports and external links to the new Home in addition to pre-made widgets. This would be a similar experience to creating a Dashboard, where you can add reports, calendars and external links.
When setting up engagement programs we always work with nested programs, not with stand alone emails.The recipient timezone feature in the stream candence is not available to nested programs or smart campaigns.To us this is a feature missing from the tool. Especially for global campaigns it is important that something like this is made available. I would also like to understand why this has not been implemented yet as I see quite some request on this topic on other channels.
We have forms that are embedded on our website (non-Marketo pages) and when troubleshooting issues or making edits to these forms, we use the website code to get the form number and then we have to try and locate this form number in Marketo by clicking through all our forms (or making educated guesses based on experience/naming conventions). It would be nice to be able to search for forms by their "Asset ID #" or Form # instead of only being able to search by name. Admitting some of this is self-inflicted due to the amount of forms we have!
Description - Currently in proof all comments threads are auto closed when opening a proof. There is a little number to let you know when a comment box has replies. It would be beneficial to have those comments auto open or options to expand all so things are not missed. If you open a comments box to review the thread, it auto closes the previous comment box (you are not able to see all comments at once to review). Why is this feature important to you - this auto expand functionality will allow reviewers to see everything all at once to reduce missed comments.How would you like the feature to work - auto expand all comments on a proof upon entry (or atleast give the option to auto open/close).Current Behaviour - Currently comment boxes are all closed and you have to click to see replies, and you cannot see more than one comment box open at a time.
Description - The report is set to present data sorted by a specific column, it would be great if the chart report follows the same sort order. Why is this feature important to you - Sorting should be consistent in both the details view and the chart view of the same report. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the chart report follow the same sorting set in the view of the details. Current Behaviour - Chart report seems to show data sorted by name regardless of what the sort is set in the view of the report.
I would like an "abort email program if number of qualified leads exceeds this limit" feature in the admin, similar to the limit for smart campaigns, to prevent users from accidently mailing to the entire database.
Right now only lead campaign limit overrides are allowed in actual smart campaigns, the same setting should be available on the settings tab of an email program where that campaign is built in.
Description - enable tracking changes at user for the field "Other Role" for any addition or removal via the System activities.Why is this feature important to you - We have processes updating the role to control access to folders based on user role and we need this info to troubleshoot issues when the role is not updated as expected.How would you like the feature to work -System activities section will show similarly to how Job Role (Primary) is displayedCurrent Behaviour -role id is tracked but this is tied to Primary role and not the Other role changes
DescriptionWould be amazing to have such button/feature on the document screen. Currently it's too easy to upload new, another document and pretty harder in comparison to update existing one to new version. In effect many people can opt to new doc upload instead of version update.
Description—Change the Background or issue an Alert if the User exceeds the required character count when entering text in a Form.For example, If we specified that this Field has a Max of 30-character count. It would be ideal to have either an Alert Message, change the background to Red, or even block the user from entering more than the specified maximum character limit. Why is this feature important to you - It prevents receiving incorrect information, which requires someone to review and follow up for correction. This takes time, and it increases the workload. How would you like the feature to work - It would be ideal to have either an Alert Message, change the background to Red, or even block the user from entering more than the specified maximum character limit. Current Behaviour - Currently, we add the character limit as part of the Question or in the tooltip, but it is mainly ignored. Users enter just a few additional characters which turns their copy unusable. We need to review, and request for the requestor to change. It is not an efficient process.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
