Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Translation of content like custom XF on Editable Template Use-case: We have a custom XF within an editable template. However, when creating a language copy for a page using that template, its XF content (or any other template content) is not translated. This necessitates either manually translating and authoring the XF content or developing a custom script for the translation process. of XF. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently when we translate a page in aem in another language its template content doesn't get translated a the reference to the template Is not given by default. Improved/Expected Behavior: if any user is translating a page content in other language its template content should also be replicated. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): version: All versions Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When setting up Workfront, our consultant recommended we utilize Programs to indicate our different clients. As an organization, we manage multiple different clients with 10-20 individual projects for each. These projects have staggered start dates that can move, so being able to see how capacity fluctuates is one way we diagnose partner health. The way the current planner works is fine for my needs as it shows on a monthly basis the capacity for each project, but then it requires me to mentally group those by partner to share out to my stakeholders. If the Program column were added, I would then be able to sort in Excel to share out the data with the different managers. Below is an example of how I have managed the date so far, but I’d like that Program level to tell me which course (project) belongs to which partner (program).
As a user working the risks section, I would like to be able: (1) Configure risks (ideal); or(2) Ensure that generally accepted risk types are included in the status list. While the risks section contains common risk statuses of Identified, Avoided, Mitigated, and Occurred, including Escalated, Exploited, Accepted, Transferred, and Shared as status would be helpful. Whether we can configure them as users or have them included will be beneficial.
The close button was removed from the proof viewer with the recent migration changes. Our team finds this to be a valuable tool to maintain efficient workflow and would like to request that feature be added back.
Description - Can we PLEASE add the ability to add colors to the swim lanes for Kanban boards? It's white and very boring. I have users moving to other systems based on the low features of Kanban boards.
Description - Allow us the ability to export data for Document & Document Version Report Types from the report windowWhy is this feature important to you - We need the ability to export this data on demand, just like any other report type. Currently, we have to send the report via email to access the data necessary for more robust reporting in Excel. Adding this feature would streamline our workflow by eliminating the extra steps and waiting time for the report to arrive in our inbox. How would you like the feature to work - Add exporting button like other report types to be able to export Excel, Tab Delimited and PDF documentsCurrent Behaviour - Does not exist; Current workaround is to send the report via email to retrieve excel file
Description - Allow option to turn off project I own and project i'm on so custom field can work in the widget.Why is this feature important to you - The widget can't work with the custom field and we are tweaking relevant projects to make those show up in the widget.How would you like the feature to work - Custom field to work in the widget (home page)Current Behaviour - Add a task with the SS PMO buddy as owner to a project so that project shows up in widget when the "projects i am on" option is selected. that's the workaround.
It would be nice to allow workers to give workers edit access to custom forms. We have a group of people who need use all the functions like a worker but only need the edit access of a planner.
Description -Why is this feature important to you -How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour -
Description - Maintain project access permissions (view, contribute, manage), even when a project is recategorized to another portfolio. Why is this feature important to you - My client recently updated their portfolios to better organize their work. The outcome was hundreds of projects being recategorized to different portfolios OR put in a portfolio for the first time. Entire groups and teams of users - including those assigned work in the projects, people whose requests were converted into these projects, and people with whom the projects had been manually shared previously - lost access. It created a massive work stoppage across much of the 1800-person userbase. How would you like the feature to work - Any manually shared project permissions OR those connected to the request that was the catalyst for the project OR people who have tasks assigned in the project are permanently maintained. The integrity of these permissions is critical for work to be done efficiently. No change to the project itself ever disrupts these permissions. (If a task assignment is changed, or a manually shared access is revoked, then that permission can disappear - but only when it is an action related to an individual user - never the project as a whole.) Current Behaviour - When a project is recategorized to another portfolio (or a portfolio is added after the project begins), sharing of that project is disrupted by the permissions set at the new portfolio.
Description: We need an option to select a 12-hour or 24-hour clock for the proofing workflow stage deadline.Why is this feature important to you?Some users are having difficulty understanding the 24-hour clock timing in the proofing workflow stage deadline.How would you like the feature to work?This feature makes it easier for users to understand the deadline time.Current Behavior: It is showing in the 24-hour clock to the proofing workflow stage deadline.for example: 5 p.m. vs. 17:00
In an A/B/C test with a control experience (eg A) and two test experiences (eg B and C), it would be extremely time saving to be able to create your Experience B (potentially with special variations for your multiple audiences) and then Copy it to start off your version C, making only the specific version C modifications needed to differentiate C from B, rather than starting from a blank slate for each experience.
It's great to be able to use the fields that live on custom objects in Salesforce within our Marketo Smart Lists & Campaigns, but when I want to get an idea of how frequently/where each individual field is used as a constraint or trigger in those lists and campaigns, there is no way to do it on a mass level. You have to look at each use of the entire custom object (which, for one of our custom objects, is hundreds of uses) to see if it uses that constraint or trigger. There should be a way to run a report or access a "used by" list for these constraint and trigger fields on custom objects.
Description - Allow admins to decide if users can remove widgets set for them on the Home page through layout templates. Why is this feature important to you - In some setups admins may not need to force users to stay married to certain widgets' presence on the Home page; they may treat widgets as suggestions but not a forced feature present on the page. How would you like the feature to work - It would be great if admins do have access to a feature, either through access levels or layout templates, to allow users to remove widgets set for them through the layout templates. Current Behaviour - Once the widget is added to a layout template, the user whom the template is assigned to is not able to remove the widget if they wish to.
Description - Allow Admins the ability to hide widgets that are not used by your teams/organizationWhy is this feature important to you - This would allow users to only pick and use widgets that the admin would like them to have available. Also, this would make it easier for training purposes to not have to explain and reiterate to users to not use certain widget types. This would simplify the experience for users and the admin to manage.How would you like the feature to work - Allow option for the admin to hide certain widgets in the layout template settingsCurrent Behaviour - Does not exist; Users see all the widget types that are available
I am the Marketo Admin for our company. This support portal will not let me add myself to open cases or launch a chat. I have some urgent sync issues that need support. Please reply and add me so I can open future tickets. We have ended our service relationship with the 3rd party implementation partner. With as much as we pay for this platform, it should not be this hard to use or get support. Very frustrated.Liz P., VP of Marketing, Coastal Business Intermediaries DBA Agency Brokerage
Each time I create a graph, I take an extra step to remove the anomaly bubbles as we have very few reports/scenarios in which they apply or are helpful. Maybe 1%? I would be very, very grateful if there were a toggle somewhere to turn OFF anomaly detection by default. Or perhaps Adobe could explore turning them off for everyone and see if you get any complaints. 🙂 My company is in media, so our metrics fluctuate significantly based on content available -- NBA Games, Star Wars, etc. etc.@jenla5, pretty please 🙂
It would be helpful to add the ability to deactivate trigger campaigns in bulk. This would be outside of the traditional deactivation Marketo does after 6 months. Event programs are notorious for having multiple trigger smart campaigns and turning them off after an event in bulk would be very helpful. Additionally, it would be even more helpful if we could set a time limit for our triggers similar to batch campaigns. The same example for an event works here too. We could set the deactivation time for after the event when we know it should be turned off thus streamlining the automation. Trying to remember to turn off some triggers is not efficient and we waste time remembering and turning them off.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - So earlier we used Confluence JIRA for tracking our tasks. In it we had a dashboard with Calendar, our tasks, status of tasks chart in one dashboard. Calendar report feature addition in Canvas dashboard will give anyone a quick snapshot what's due in a month or a week really quick without checking the details of it. We as a team/ group, certainly missing this feature to be added in the Canvas Dashboard (which is customisable in terms of layout and resizing). Standard Dashboard though have the option to add calendar in it however, it's not customisable and resizable.How would you like the feature to work - We are able to add the Calendar Report in a Canvas Dashboard which has blobs (thick vertical bars of the tasks due on the particular day of a month - for e.g. say 5 tasks are due on 25 Sep'24 there must be 5 blobs, i.e., thick vertical line; say there is 1 task due on 28 Sep so one blob visible)Current Behaviour - Currently, calendar report we are able to add in the standard Dashboard, but it's not resizable which takes up the whole page, while Canvas Dashboard lack this feature of adding calendar report altogether. Adding this feature will be one of the milestones for Workfront for sure.
機能改善要求（RFE）概要： In the current UI, the sidebar cannot be expanded horizontally, preventing the full display of query names. I would like to have the ability to see the full list of query names, perhaps by allowing the sidebar to be expanded horizontally. 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： AEM Release: 2024.7.17098.20240711T134106Z スクリーンショット（ある場合）
ISSUE: PROOF FUNCTIONALITY TAKES FILES OUT OF SOURCE FORMATWhen using the proofing functionality, anything besides a PDF (e.g., Word DOC, Figma FIG, Powerpoint PPT) all get converted to a PDF therefore losing the working file so the agency must continually take feedback from a PDF and go back to the source document (Word DOC, Powerpoint PPT, etc). and reincorporate the feedback, creating room for error and missed feedback versus accepting, declining changes etc. Conversations about the document are essentially happening outside of the working file when we use proofs, creating additional work for the agency team.This creates a scenario where the agency is Referencing to “printed” PDFs to manually cross-transfer comment input back into source document creating risk because the team is working in multiple filesImpact: High impact for all projects, high risk for errors, creating additional work for project management and creativeIdeal solve: documents uploaded as a proof would remain in their native source file format and could be downloaded and shared as such, removing the need for multiple versions of essentially the same document just in different formats
Description - Ability to update the project template association on a projectWhy is this feature important to you - We have built a lot of our content operations reporting based on the project template associate (asset type). How would you like the feature to work - We are currently working on a thought leadership piece that we initially thought was going to be a blog, so we leveraged out blog project template. The content has evolved and is now a full blown Viewpoint piece, which uses a different set of tasks to get to done. So, now the asset type on this piece will not appear correct in any of our content reports. Current Behaviour - We originally created this project: https://experience.adobe.com/#/@cgi/so:cgi-Production/workfront/project/66463d4f00258653b6af4b0d132cfb31/tasks originally using our Blog project template but it's now a Viewpoint. So, this Viewpoint (now) reports as a Blog, even though it's no longer a blog. We now have to create a new project and hope it doesn't cause confusion. I had opened a case on this and told there was no solution at the moment so that is why I'm submitting this as an idea: Case #00418861.
We would like to see an option that the whole project is read only after it's completed so new comments can't be left unless the project is reopened by an admin. We have had several users that go into a completed project and want to make changes so they leave a comment in the updates and/or on the proofs and just expect us to know they did that, without any tagging.
I have noticed that a "Rejection comment" field is available in the Hour schema, but at this time there is no way to add this comment through Workfront interface; this has been confirmed to me by a Workfront support representative. We can add the field in a view, but users have no way to enter information in it! In my company the ability to add a rejection comment is important for the timesheet/hour approval process, and now users are forced to add information to the hour description, mixing the rejection comment with the hour description entered by the hour owner, which is far from the ideal situation.It would be enough to add a textarea in the hour edit window, since it seems that the Workfront database already has the field available, so this should not be a very time-consuming feature to add.Thanks for your attention!Andrea Benfenati
Now that we can create custom objects, it would be very efficient to be able to create custom object flows through flow steps, exactly as we can do with tasks.For each custom object defined in the admin, we would need 3 flow steps:Create (would take all the fields as input)Update (would require the UID + the fields to be updated)Delete (would required the UID)The create/update could also be replaced with 1 upsert one.Obviously, if it's a SFDC custom objects, the fields available would have to be set through mapping.With regards to Marketo custom objects, all fields created in Marketo should be available to be set in the flow steps.All the fields of the custom objects could be set with tokens.Typical usage : I create a custom object : product interest, with a few fields (Time frame, quantities). I Create the same fields at lead level, that I use in a form. Once a lead fills out the form, I create a custom instance and populate the fields with the lead tokens.We should also be able to update them, though the same mechanism.-Greg
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
