New possible duplicate records could be found by adding new fields or combination of fields in the "Duplicate Fields" filter.Besides the existing ones, we believe the following ones would help detect duplicates:1- Mobile Phone Number2- LinkedIn Profile URL3- Combination of First Name, Last Name and Company NameAnd we understand the level of complexity of doing so should be relatively low.
We would love the ability to limit smart assignments on tasks to only users who have Work/Plan licenses. All of our review/request users also pop up as suggestions, which clutters the smart assignments and sometimes leads to mistakes as the wrong person gets chosen easily. They often even pop up as the first and/or second option where Work/Plan users get pushed down the list. This would speed up time assigning tasks and minimize room for error in assigning an incorrect person. Thank you!
Current Behaviour -Presently, when sharing a proof, the proof appears as though it is coming from the user who shares it, as it inserts their email in the 'from' and 'reply-to' sections.How would you like the feature to work -We want better control over the headers and bodies of emails leaving Workfront proof, especially around the 'from' and 'reply-to' fields. This needs to allow us to use proof's email sharing as a 'no-reply' address.Why is this feature important to you -The current method of working increases administrative burden on our teams, as external users respond to the emails directly, rather than adding their comments to the proofs. It also limits who can share proofs with a client, as having non client facing users uploading/sharing proofs can cause confusion, especially if email replies are sent directly to them.
Description - Within the existing Board design, the Intake column does not display the Due date of the Task or Issue on the face of the card until it is brought into a main column. Nor is that column sortable by any of the same options supported for the rest of the columns that have been created, even as a partial solution. This makes it a barrier to user adoption, as they have no way to understand what is being asked of them first without opening each card in the Intake column to find the information. Why is this feature important to you - For any team or individual trying to manage their workflow on a Board, the ability to quickly understand 'what is being asked for first'? is critical to the usability of the Boards. Without that easy visibility, teams may prioritize discussions about items that are not as time sensitive as something later in the list. For any team or individual with more than a handful of work requests, this is simply unrealistic to expect and they are switching back to old task and issue reports to manage their work.How would you like the feature to work - The 'Planned Due Date' field should display on the face of the Intake column cards exactly as it does in every other column. Clicking 'Sort By' should affect the Intake column exactly as it does every other column. Current Behavior - Field is not displayed, and Sort functionality does not affect the Intake column at all.
Description - Currently when viewing the blueprint page you are shown an "install" button and a "details" button. Upon first glance it appears as though this hasn't been downloaded to the system yet. The only way to find out that the Blueprint was installed is to click the "details" button which isn't intuitive for some end users. Why is this feature important to you - Users are requesting downloads of objects that have already been implemented and don't have a way to see that easily. This causes duplicate work for system administrators. How would you like the feature to work - Instead of "install", once it's installed change the button to something else or add a new button. Current Behaviour - have to click into details to see that it's been downloaded.
Description - Bubble data with similar data points in bubble charts overlay on each other, making it impossible to read the writings on the bubbles and distinguish between them in any way. Why is this feature important to you - users need to be able to read the informaiton shown on the charts. Otherwise the chart is of no use. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the writings of informaiton on the chart be readable clearly and if two items have similar/close data they be distinguishable on the chart, at least after clicking on the bubbles. Current Behaviour - It is impossible to read the bubble on the bubble chart; writing shows as many words written on top of each other and scratchy.
Description - Bubble Chart Reports Groupings that are custom statuses should show the custom status label(name) and not the system default one. Why is this feature important to you - Presenting different names for statuses creates confusion among report audiences. How would you like the feature to work - Chart Reports Groupings that are custom statuses should should show the custom status label(name) and not the system default one. Current Behaviour - Chart Reports Groupings that are custom statuses show the system default status name rather than the custom status name..
Hi Adobe Team / @amelia_waliany ,While reviewing the documentation for switching experiences in XT activity available at Experience Targeting Documentation, I noticed that the behaviour described for single-experience XT activities doesn't seem to work as expected. Specifically, the document mentions that "Visitors remain in an experience even if they cease to qualify for the audience that put them in that experience."To verify this, I conducted a POC, and the results were different from what is outlined in the documentation. I have recorded a step by step video demonstrating my findings, which I have given below for your review.Guideflow interactive demo Please let me know if I am doing something wrong here, or if the documentation might need to be updated. If the latter is the case, I kindly request that this point be corrected.Looking forward to your feedbacks.Best regards,Vaibhav Mathur
What is the current situation? I currently have the problem that redirectOffers are running in Activities on a page with the WebSDK (asynchronously via Adobe Launch / Data Collection). The preHiding snippet is also used. Yes, at the first alloy sendEvent the style with the id alloy-prehiding is removed accordingly. But this is unfavorable for redirect offers because the page may be displayed before the redirect takes place. To fix this, I have currently built this workaround. I make an alloy sendEvent in Launch. I also pass the desired data to AT. What is new now - is that I additionally check in the promise with .then whether has_schema(data, “personalization/redirect-item”) contains. If this is the case, I know that this is a redirect offer and insert an additional hiding. In this case, not the default document.body.style = “opacity: 0;” - but that I only use the cmp-container and page-wrapper style classes in my setup here. I also do not insert the id alloy-prehiding here. As this is a redirect - I am not adding a timeout here either (you can of course extend this accordingly). What should the feature do? My idea is - that I don't have to do this myself, but that the WebSDK itself checks whether a redirect-item is contained in the first alloy sendEvent call. Or at least the option that a checkbox with a field for custom CSS is available here, for example. Note: I am aware here that with a very slow connection - the problem is that the normal prehiding snippet is removed after 3 seconds anyway - before Launch has been executed if necessary. Example code how my current workaround is: var data = { '__adobe' : { 'target' : { … } } } alloy("sendEvent", { "data": data, "renderDecisions": true, "xdm": { … } } }).then((data) => { const is_redirect = has_schema(data, "personalization/redirect-item") if(is_redirect) { const style = document.createElement("style"); style.innerText = '.cmp-container, .page-wrapper { opacity: 0 !important; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); } })
It would be amazing if I could request calculated metrics in a report.queue API request to DataWarehouse, as in:{ "reportDescription": { "reportSuiteID": "some_suite_id", "dateFrom": "2017-11-01", "dateTo": "2017-11-01", "metrics": [ {"id": "cmSome_CalculatedMetric_ID"} ], "elements": [ {"id": "some_prop"} ], "source": "warehouse" }}
Description - When filter of a chart report is changed through the Details tab, only the data in the Details tab of the report updates and not the data shown on the chart. Why is this feature important to you - Report tabs show different data. How would you like the feature to work - When filter of a chart report is changed through the Details tab, the data show in the chart should change as well. Current Behaviour - When filter of a chart report is changed through the Details tab, only the data in the Details tab of the report updates and not the data shown on the chart.
Resumen de la solicitud de mejora de funciones (RFE): It is very complicated to choose a thumbnail in a video, especially those of long duration, or through the “Select Frame from video” option. Caso de uso: As an author, I need to be able to easily and quickly choose the thumbnail of my videos through the video itself. Comportamiento actual/experimentado: Currently, AEM offers two ways to perform this action (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-cloud-kcs/kbarticles/ka-24053#:~:text=On%20the%20Change%20Thumbnail%20page%2C%20you%20can%20either). The first one, to which I refer in this request, only allows you to choose the thumbnail after viewing it and stopping the video at the exact moment. In addition, if the video lasts for example 10 minutes and you want a thumbnail of the end, you have to spend 10 minutes just to be able to choose it (and of course to get the exact frame right).This experience is unfeasible to carry out in a continuous workflow and with many videos. Comportamiento mejorado/esperado: Being able to scroll on demand through the video, something like a time bar with play and pause, just like in any video player, could be useful. Detalles del entorno (versión de AEM, Service Pack y cualquier otra especificación, si corresponde): https://author-p47754-e237306.adobeaemcloud.com/ Nombre del cliente o de la organización: Real Madrid CF Captura de pantalla (si corresponde): Paquete de código (si corresponde)
Description - as mentioned in this thread, currently there seems to be no to_string function to case any other type into a string. "concat" seems to be a workaround, yet still I think this is a missing feature Why is this feature important to you - sometimes a schema field requires a string which will fail validation e.g., when a number is coming in. There seem to be a lot of other "to_xyz" type casting functions around, yet this may be one of the most essential ones. How would you like the feature to work - provide a new function "to_string" that converts any incoming type to its string representation Current Behaviour - no explicit function available. "concat" seems to work as a workaround
Hi All, Much appreciate if anyone can share their insights on this. We sent out daily / weekly emails to external users and we include ourselves as recipient in every email as we want to receive the final copy of email. Is there a way we can set communication limit only to external users, but we continue to receive all the emails we send. Much appreciate if anyone has solution to this, if not can Marketo team can think of adding this feature?. My suggestion is we can exclude communication level based on domain names in the emails address. Thanks,Rajendra Patil
Our users were noting that the order number on the agile(scrum) backlog is skipping numbers (see attached). After some investigating, it appears the missing order numbers are tied to tasks on projects with a On Hold status. I did some testing in our Sandbox and this behavior appears to be the same with a Dead project status. In the cases where projects are put on hold, I would assume the stories are taken out of the backlog order sequence and then added to the bottom of the backlog if and when the project becomes active again. This is even more critical with Dead project status. Dead is a final status and if those order numbers are tied to those tasks forever, then the order sequence will always be off. REF Support Case 00409919
Description -When I break down one dimension by another, I can select all the parent dimension elements, then drag over the correlation variable and that is applied to all the parent dimension elements. The default row display is 5 for the correlation variable. I can change this for each correlation individually. I would like to be able to have the rows display set for a different number automatically for the correlated variable. Why is this feature important to you -If there are a large number or rows in the parent variable, changing the row setting for each correlated instance can be very time consuming. How would you like the feature to work -I'm not sure of the best way to do this. Perhaps in a right click setting on the parent variable. This could be applied either before the correlation or after. Current Behaviour -Per Client Care, this functionality does not currently exist.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.