Build better products with our product team
Currently a fall back-offer is obligatory. Fall-back Offers should be optional so that an Offer Decisionig request can be empty when there is no persoalized Offer to propose.It should remain an option not to propose anything to the customer if there is no personalized Offer to be proposed.
We would like to see Adobe workspaces have an option to embed a link to the live report that allows a visitor to interact with the report. We would like to use the “Share with anyone” link in the workspaces to be able to embed this in iFrame. This would make our work a lot easier.
For developers it is not possible to edit the html of a fragment. In ACS this was possible via Edit - HTML. Once you have created the fragment via the Designer, if the code is not working as it should, you should be able to edit the html as well. That is how developers usually work. The feature should work something like in ACS where you can add the edit HTML option somewhere. Current behavior is create a new fragment, but that is not ideal.
In AJO we cannot delete fragments which should not be used anymore. There is an archiving option. Next to archiving my team would like to have this feature to clean up fragments which should never be used anymore This should only be possible with certain rights, not for every user. Current Behaviour = Archiving all fragments which should not be used anymore. Any ideas?
Description - Sorry if the subject was a bit cryptic 😀 When creating email content we often have content to be shown to only a set of customers e.g. has not downloaded our mobile app or belongs to this VIP customer group. In todays dynamic content there is always a default option, so we cannot use the built in functionality to include/exclude customers to receive this specific topic. We solve this today using a IF statement in the HTML code or add a Offer. It works but it's not as easy as adding a dynamic rule. And we see it might be more complicated the more offers we will add to the email content. Why is this feature important to you - We are going to start using fragments and several offers with in our email content. having the possibility to add a dynamic content to be shown only to some customers without having a default item will make it easier for not-so-technical content creators to generate email content. How would you like the feature to work - When adding a dynamic content make it possible to delete the default one and only have one with an expression. Current Behavior - We cannot have dynamic content only for one customer group, it's not possible to remove the default content.
Description -* In an enterprise context, there are multiple users who will open and may make changes to a canavs. Having an inspectable history of changes that have happened will enable the ability to pinpoint which last change may have caused negative effects to the canvas' outputsWhy is this feature important to you - This will increase agility for our canvas teams and improve our debug speed.How would you like the feature to work - When inside an actual canvas, navigate to Canvas Properties, expandable section to show version changesCurrent Behaviour - Only able to see "Last Updated By" and "Last Update" on the Journeys > Browse UI
Description - We have noticed that when two users have the same canvas open, and they are both making changes to the canvas (co-editing), changes are not saved between both users at the same time. As a result, we've tried to enforce discipline where one user has the canvas open at a time and users who finish editing a canvas closes that window/tab, in order to not affect future users' changes to the canvas. However, this does not always work well. It would help to know when the canvas is receiving active data from a users' session, so that I can proactively reach out to that user internally to ask them to close their windows/tabsWhy is this feature important to you - We have lost work due to "loss of changes" because of the lack of co-editing supportHow would you like the feature to work - It would help if there was a way to show when another user has the canvas active. This could look like how the Google Suite/Microsoft Office shows active sessions from other users. Current Behaviour - There is no indication of other users who have the canvas active on their device.
Description - I applaud for finally making some changes to the Target UI. However, there are several items that I think are needed to help improve it. 1. There's a lot of wasted space on the far left where it says 'all activities' 'failed and draft activities' . That takes up a whole 'column' of space in my layout.2. the columns still can't be adjusted for width. Our activity names are very long and it would be helpful to be able to adjust the width of that column so we can see more of the name. Even if you delete an multiple columns of data, it does not re-adjust column widths to fill page and show more of the activity name. 3. in the old UI, you could hover over the activity name and see the full name, that is no longer possible. The only way to see the full name is to click into it. That's very inefficient.4. You have a bug where often times when you click on an activity name, instead of loading that activity, it just reloads the main page.Why is this feature important to you - It's the tool we use every day and would love to see it continue to improve How would you like the feature to work - should be able to click and drag column width to set that width and should retain that layout next time you return to UICurrent Behaviour - cannot adjust column widths today
Description -Why is this feature important to you - Customer should able to see their own company logo after logging into Workfront.How would you like the feature to work - The option should be available to upload a customize logo in WorkfrontCurrent Behaviour - No custom branding option is available for the customers who are moved to admin console.
For global form validation rules, at the moment we can only do one of two things:(1) Either use the default file provided by Marketo which have 3000+ domains(2) Or create a separate rule blocking specific domains The issue with (2) is that Marketo has a 2000 character limit for the list of domains that hardly suffice requirements especially when we see increased bot traffic. At the moment the default file cannot be edited as well. It would be great if Marketo provides a file based approach for the domain list so we can make use of all the free domains from the default file as well as others that we might want to add. This either/or approach is limiting in nature. Best,Shweta.
DescriptionThe guided analysis feature in Workspace allows users to share configured items with others. While the creator can use a descriptive name to help others understand what the guided analysis may be about, there is not an option to add a description that provides more information about what the guided analysis is about. The screenshot below shows what the tooltip currently looks like: Why is this feature important to youThe point of guided analysis is to allow users to include pre-configured analysis into their Workspace projects. As more of these are created and shared, it will be increasingly important for people to know which one to use. Currently, there is no way to convey what a guided analysis should be used for or what the settings of the guided analysis are. How would you like the feature to workAllow a description field in the guided analysis configurator. This would be similar to descriptions in the filter and calculated metric builder, as well as for components in the data view builder. Once saved, the description would appear in the tooltip. Current BehaviourThere is no description field available in guided analysis.
Description - Currently, there is a limitation in the # of rows to export data to Excel or even using "Send Report". The suggestion was to filter the report further. Sometimes it is not convenient to see data in multiple report chunks when wanted to see a more complete picture.Why is this feature important to you - It is not convenient to see data in multiple report chunks when wanted to see a more complete picture.How would you like the feature to work - If not able to do a report export directly from Workfront, would at least like to use the "Send Report" option instead.Current Behaviour - Get a 504 error message and not able to get the export.
Description - Allowing customization of the ORDER in which status options appear.Why is this feature important to you - Allows for status to be selected in the typical order that they move from one status to another rather than fixed in an order not based on logic.How would you like the feature to work - I would like to change the order in settings and then have the same order apply throughout the instance (Project statuses in Settings = Project status in projects, in Project Details, in project reports, etc.)Current Behaviour - Reordering in Settings does not change the order of appearance in other places. How it is in settings would be the order it appears in Projects (and other drop downs)
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: "List all Content Fragments" endpoint should return valid `etag` value Use-case: I call "List all Contents Fragments" endpoint to get the list of all CFs I parse this list (array of JSONs) and get `id` and `etag` field value I provide these values when call "Delete Content Fragment" endpoint Current/Experienced Behavior: The DELETE endpoint returns the following error:If-Match header does not match the current ETag of the resource Improved/Expected Behavior: The DELETE endpoint should successfully process the request Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): I'm using https://developer.adobe.com/experience-cloud/experience-manager-apis/api/experimental/sites/ Customer-name/Organization name: Bayer Screenshot (if applicable): More details here: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/quot-list-all-content-fragments-quot-endpoint-does-not-return/m-p/748099#M183204 Code package (if applicable):
Description -User feedback needs to be meaningfulWhy is this feature important to you -A user submits a requestThis request is handled by Fusion script to move/create a new object in WFthe toast panel suggests to "go to request"the initial request is not where we would like to direct the user, we'd need to direct the user to the automation result.How would you like the feature to work -Let API dev the ability to write meaningful feedbacks to the user through the toast panel (error or success)Current Behaviour -No way to personalize toast messages
The problem is the limitation of the length there.In the original CSV file, there is much more than 2000 and now once I create new one, I don’t have the option to upload a file, just to write down the domains and I limiter for only 2000 length.please let us upload a list without limit.
Description - I'd like the product manager for this area to explore ways to indicate a list of users that it's appropriate to ask access from, in order to view an object. Why is this feature important to you - 1) The majority of the list is random and often the wrong person is on the list. 2) Our service account owns a lot of objects in Workfront and should be excluded from the list since it is not a real person. 3) In particular, the hierarchy for an issue is incorrect (for a task the owner is the primary assignee or the project owner, and for an issue it's the primary contact or the project owner -- I'd like to see the primary assignee in this list as well) How would you like the feature to work - There are any number of solutions. For one, add the primary assignee for an issue onto that list. For another, be able to indicate on the user object that this person should never be asked for access (this would solve our service account issue). Ideally, you should be able to indicate an owner for ANY object (this includes reports) so that you can manually put this person at the top of the list. Current Behaviour - per link, there's a set hierarchy of who gets asked to grant access -- usually two people, one being the owner of the object and the other being the owner of the container. However there's a potential list of 10 so the remaining names are somewhat arbitrary and apparently random (although I've also found the same names get repeated over and over) https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/workfront/using/basics/grant-request-object-permissions/request-access.html?lang=en#hierarchy-of-the-request-access-and-request-more-access-drop-down-menus
Description - while in emails you have bcc functionality that allow the company to have a copy of the exact message sent to the client , in push and sms there isn't a way to do that Why is this feature important to you - we work with insurance and banks and it really necessary to have copy of the end client.How would you like the feature to work - i think the best is the save the data in temporary dataset for a month , and let us to export it with the destination feature then delete it. as i was told, this feature was in the former campaign product Current Behaviour - no record at all
Description -I need the AEP/AJO system to identify proactively journeys or experiences that may not be behaving as planned. For instance if a customer is receiving an email multiple times or reentering a journey multiple times due to a design flaw, Why is this feature important to you:We had a journey trigger 3-20 times to the same customers and there was not way to spot this issue within the application, however all the data is within the system. Teams design with the best of intentions, however I want the application to help monitor performance for ongoing solutions/automations. How would you like the feature to work -I would like AEP/AJO to flag this to an Admin to identify if this behaviour is aligning with the intended Journey. If the admin approves, then this alert can be dismissed. I want the AI assistant to alert us. I would like to be able to set a global guardrails that flags customers who have reentered a journey or is sent the same email message from within the same journey more than X time in Y period of time. Current Behaviour -The issue was not visible within the tool, and went unnoticed. Once the issue was identified many weeks/months later, we could see the issue by looking at the data. I want the AI assistant to proactive spot these anomalies and flag them to us. It should have spotted that these customers have reentered the journey for a 3rd
Description - When calling data collection API, product not validating dataset id and schema id's. Getting 200 even for invalid datasetsWhy is this feature important to you - To be able monitor Ingestion calls accurate statusHow would you like the feature to work - API should give 4xx when right dataset or schema id's are providedCurrent Behaviour - When calling data collection API, product not validating dataset id and schema id's. Getting 200 even for invalid datasets
please enable the same functionality introduced with 22.3 to customize the project header to programs & portfolios.This will help us remove wrong data from being a visual focus for users. (wrong b/c our workflow is different)
Currently only unauthenticated calls can receive the location hint as a parameter on the call
Description - show a "V" icon or similar in the custom form builder when there is validation logic set up on a field.Why is this feature important to you - showing an icon allows us to quickly know, at a glance, which fields have validation logic set up. Without it, the only way for me to know is if there is NO icon, and when clicking on the field it says "Edit logic" on the right-hand panel as opposed to "Add logic". How would you like the feature to work - "V" icon on custom form builder, and logic details in right-hand panel when field is selected.Current Behaviour - right now, only skip logic and display logic show icons on the form builder. No icon shows up for validation logic.
The beginning of the month my team upgraded to the new Workfront licensing and it has been a small nightmare fixing project, document and report access for all my contributors. Why have settings in templates, reports and elsewhere that set view rights when you still have to go into each object and set the permissions manually per contributor? This is creating a tremendous amount of extra work for myself and my team. Was this change, made for what must be monetary gains only, worth it at the expense of all the aggravation you are causing your users?
Description - Right now when a dynamic board is used which is connected to projects, checklist items disappear if you connect a new project to the board later. According to support, this is expected behavior. Need to either make this not happen or turn off the capability for a dynamic board to have checklist items. Why is this feature important to you - Checklist items are important for our users and having these disappear when certain things are added to the board without warning, is unacceptable. User would have to re-enter these, if they remember what they were, and then if something else is connected, they would disappear again. How would you like the feature to work - for you to be able to connect projects to a dynamic board on an ongoing basis as well as using the checklist items feature without worrying about things disappearing. Current Behavior - See above.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
