Build better products with our product team
Currently, AJO does not include audience id in the Send Logs of the AJO Message Feedback dataset. This makes it difficult to analyze which specific audience groups are associated with a given campaign, track the effectiveness of messaging per audience segment, and integrate campaign performance data seamlessly with other Adobe Experience Platform (AEP) datasets. Why is this feature important to you?•Helps in measuring campaign success across different audience segments.•Enhances reporting and analytics by allowing segmentation-based performance tracking. Current Behavior•The AJO Message Feedback dataset provides logs for sent, delivered, opened, and clicked messages but does not contain audience segmentation details.
Description - We have a need to show and enforce a word limit at the custom form level on text fields. The use case for this is an automation we are building to send a content fragment (e.g., a paragraph) to another system (e.g., Seismic) for input into a piece of content (e.g., a PowerPoint) Why is this feature important to you - This will enable the automations we are building between Workfront and other systems to assemble pieces of content with limited manual input. Without a word limit, users who are unaware of the limit will have to spend time rewriting content, which hinders the efficiency we are trying to create. How would you like the feature to work - As stated in description. Current Behaviour - No word limit is shown or enforced anywhere in Workfront to my understanding.
If the numbers for a send de- or increase in the process...i want to know this. Idea is a form where i can add that i want to be informed, at which level of change (5 percent, 10 percent or more, and to which email or telephon or account thiis information should go! The same process should happen if an error occurs du to the process.
Description - The only way we have found to preview the confirmation text for an unsubscribe page is through "preview/test" the problem is we need to click the button "confirm" to see the confirmation text. When doing this the selected test profile gets unsubscribed and cannot be used to send proof. Seems like a hassle to get them re-subscribed as we need to use API's which isn't ideal when it's users testing and they should then be able to either revert the unsubscribe OR test the confirmation page some other way.Why is this feature important to you - We want to preview everything that is exposed to our customers, sometimes multiple times and still send proofs normally with same test-profiles.How would you like the feature to work - Separate preview from test. So if we click "preview" the profile doesn't get unsubscribed but we can still see the look of the unsubscribe page as well as the confirmation page. The second mode for TEST would then be used to test if unsubscribe as a feature works as expected. It makes no sense to have one or the other as both are important.Current Behaviour - Described in description
Why is this feature important to you?Loosing email subscribers is a threat to every marketing program. This is why we should assure opt-out requests are gathered where recipients actually still like to receive emails. But this happens when content filters / spam filters analyze URLs in our emails. They need to "click" every link in order to analyze where the link redirects to and if it leads to a landingpage which is potentially dangerous. As this may be done for all URLs within our emails this affects unsubscribe links as well. Unfortunately this leads to automated "bot clicks" causing unsubscribed email recipients which have to be excluded from further email campaigns. We must avoid this happens with email subscribers who actually still like to receive our content. How would you like the feature to work?Of cause a 2step opt-out process is a solution to solve this problem. However we need to make sure that unsubscribers which were gathered via 2step opt-out process are still counted within context of a campaign. This is needed in order to calculate unsubscribe rates on campaign-level. If unsubscribers from 2step-process are not counted / attributed for the campaign / email from where the unsubscribe link was used then the unsubscribe rates of campaigns would be incorrect. It would be way too low as it would only count unsubscribers which were gathered via list unsubscribe header. So there would be an opt-out rate - but it would be incorrect / to low. That would be worse than having reporting with no opt-out rate at all because an incorrect rate would be misleading for most users. Current Behaviour?The API where we can ingest unsubscribers from the 2step opt-out process does not reflect the campaign which was unsubscribed. Therefore unsubscribed email addresses are gathered without connection to a campaign. This results in the mentioned problem / incorrect unsubscribe rates on campaign-level.
Description For an offer in the Decision Management, I would like to be able to configure how many times a profile should be able to see an offer during a chosen time period. It's already possible to set up a capping count and reset capping frequency but I would like to have an extra option for adding time periods when an active offer can be temporarily paused for a profile.Use case:Asking customers to fix their interest rate on their housing loan from a short time frame to 5 years.The offer capping is three and the reset frequency is monthly. After two months of showing this offer, the offer should be paused for 6 months, thereafter again showing to the customer with a capping of three times and two monthly resets. And so on... Why is this feature important to youWe have offers that are "always on" type of offers - not changing over years. However, we don't want to spam our customers with this type of offers and because of that we would like to have the option of a temporarily paus for any customer who has seen the offer for some time. How would you like the feature to work Add an extra option in the offer creation to be able to set a schedule for when the offer should be temporarily paused for an eligible customer that has seen the offer (capping) for some time (reset frequency).
Description -When searching for audience and journeys, I want to be able to search by including AND excluding terms. I want smart search. Why is this feature important to you -We mark several of our journeys as DEMO and Test, for earlier versions. I should be able to search for a specific name and exclude a letter combination that I do not want. Also I want to be able to say it Contains "XYZ" & "ABC", instead of needing to know the exact spelling of the journey every time. As we empower more teams to work on the tool, and create more journeys it become more challenging to reference journeys created weeks/months How would you like the feature to work -I want a smart search feature OR the ability to filter results in the left panel by including/excluding specific terms.I would like a close match capability as well. Current Behaviour -Only can search for specific phrases. If there is an extra space or typo in the search it will return no results. Currently I need to know the exact spelling of the journey every time or receive no results.
Description: I want to upload both desktop-friendly and mobile-friendly images when designing email content to ensure email responsiveness.Why is this feature important to you: This feature is important because it ensures that emails are visually appealing and properly formatted on both desktop and mobile devices, enhancing the user experience and engagement.How would you like the feature to work: I would like the ability to upload and specify different images for desktop and mobile views within the email design tool. The system should automatically detect the device type and display the appropriate image accordingly. Additionally, it would be nice if I can crop accordingly with the different views in mind.Current Behaviour: Currently, there is no built-in functionality to upload and specify different images for desktop and mobile views. This limitation can result in emails that do not display optimally on all devices, potentially affecting user experience and engagement.
Description: I am looking for ways to enable data segregation within a sandbox, allowing different teams to have access to different objects such as journeys, campaigns, etc. The goal is to avoid the cumbersome process of manually assigning labels after objects are created to ensure that only relevant roles can see specific labels. Alternatively, having folder level access control where objects inside such folders will inherit access control restrictions would be beneficial. Why is this feature important to you: This feature is important because it streamlines the process of data segregation, ensuring that teams can efficiently manage and access their respective objects without the need for manual label assignments. It enhances security and organization by automatically restricting access based on roles. How would you like the feature to work: I would like the feature to automatically assign labels to all objects created by certain roles, ensuring that only users with those roles can see these objects. Alternatively, folder level control with cascading permissions for objects within the folder, with folder-level label assignments being respected for all entities within those folders. Current Behaviour: Currently, labels must be manually assigned to objects after they are created, which is cumbersome and inefficient. This manual process is required to ensure that objects are visible only to users with specific roles who can see the assigned labels.
I see when we add e-mail addresses or domains to the Allowed list under the E-mail settings we are not able to edit this after it is saved, and the description field is to short. You cant read the whole description text. It would be a good idea to be able to edit on a added "user" instead of deleting and adding the same person with a new address this is changed.
Hi, I'd like to propose an enhancement to current Content template & Fragments by introducing Access level control Default Content templates & Fragments: These should be accessible only by admins or super users to prevent unauthorized modification. User-created templates & Fragments: Users can create templates/Fragments and have control over who can access or edit or delete them. Why is this feature important to you Improved governance - making sure critical or pre-approved templates/fragments are not unintentionally altered by non-admin or super usersUser control - Enables users to create templates tailored to their need without option to add restrictions. How would you like the feature to work -Add access level control similar based on role and user groupsIn UI user should have a drop down to choose who should have access - several roles can be assigned.Admin always have default access to assign or update permissionsUsers trying to access / modify templates/fragments should get a warning/error message e.g. access denied. User should not have access to these templates when creating content in Journey or Campaigns. User can copy an existing content template/ fragment without inheriting permission level. Current Behavior -No permission level on Content templates
Description:Dynamic URLs generated from individual offer content are currently not being tracked for email click tracking, even though template language is used to create the tracking links. We need a solution to ensure these links are properly tracked. Why is this feature important to you:Accurate tracking of dynamic URLs is crucial for understanding customer engagement and measuring the effectiveness of email campaigns. Without this functionality, we lose valuable insights into user behavior and campaign performance. It also impacts decision-making and reporting accuracy. How would you like the feature to work:The system should support the tracking of dynamic URLs, ensuring all links generated using template language are automatically converted into trackable links. Additionally, it should provide a clear resolution path and guidance for implementation. Current Behaviour:Currently, dynamic URLs created from individual offer content are not tracked, despite using the template language to generate tracking links. This results in incomplete data for email campaign performance and creates uncertainty about how to address this issue. PS: Here is a support ticket where aspects of the issue were discussed more in details:https://jira.corp.adobe.com/browse/PLATIR-36089
Description:Introduce functionality to allow users to choose the placement of the tracking pixel, either at the top or bottom of emails, directly through the UI interface. This feature would enhance tracking accuracy and improve the overall user experience. Why is this feature important to you:The current placement of the tracking pixel at the bottom of emails limits the accuracy and speed of engagement tracking. Allowing placement at the top would address key challenges, including missed opens from recipients who don’t scroll through the email, delayed pixel loading in heavy-content emails, and inconsistencies across devices and email clients.Allowing the user to place the tracking pixel to the top of the email could bring several benefits, and we wanted to share why we believe this enhancement would add value: 1. Faster Engagement Tracking: A top-placed pixel activates as soon as the email is opened, providing immediate and accurate open-rate data. 2. Improved Metrics Reliability: Reduces the risk of missing opens from recipients who don’t scroll through the entire email. 3. Optimized User Experience: Ensures tracking accuracy even in emails with heavier content that might delay full loading. 4. Device and Client Consistency: Makes tracking more reliable across different email clients and devices, including those that truncate or partially load emails. How would you like the feature to work:The UI should include a simple option to select the desired tracking pixel placement (top or bottom). The system should automatically adjust the email structure to ensure proper pixel functionality, providing flexibility to suit diverse use cases. Current Behaviour:Currently, the tracking pixel is fixed at the bottom of emails, causing delays in engagement tracking, inaccuracies in open-rate data, and reduced reliability across different devices and email clients. This limitation impacts the effectiveness of performance insights and optimization efforts.
It is important for a AJO user to be able to create both subscription lists and landing pages on there own. Today this feature is connected to a "high level" of user access, like site admin or site owner. In our daily work it is then difficult to test and use this where nice feature because it it not accessible. Could it be an idea to separate this accesses from the high level access that we need today to be able to use this feature. Then admin can keep there admin and owner rights and we can still use this feature when and as we like.
When we run our daily batched to ingest data to AEP we know that many customers has the same e-mail address and/or Mobil number. There is several reasons for this. But it means also that this data points cant be the validator for a unique customer. This again is creating some issues reaching out to the right customer, it the contact data is duplicated. Before customer data is ingested it would be nice it the system did a duplicate check on e-mail and on mobile phone number, customers with one or several duplicates can then been flagged with a Attribute. We can then create Audiences on the customers with "error" in the contact data. This makes it easy to contact the customer in another cannel and inform the customer. We see that this in many cases can happen when you have under 18 years customers, that needs to have there parents contact info. And when the older this is still the data connected to them. Or it can be man and wife. We need to be able to contact the right person. Ta make this easier for the end user it would there be nice to have a AJO report on witch customers that has a duplicate and give them and Attribute we can act on, straight and right out of the box.
Description - It is a new feature where global exit criteria introduced. we wanted this feature in our initial time itself. we wanted to reduce number of audience creation in many ways. this will help us to reduce the number of audience count as well. so, we need a attribute based filtering condition in the exit criteria not only audience and eventsWhy is this feature important to you - Already, we received the threshold of audience count and we are not using edge events, so custom event also we can't use much. we want to use this feature because we use to check "still a customer" etc.. So, we need this feature How would you like the feature to work - As we have restriction on creating number of audience why we use audience for an option which will increase the count instead, we can give attributes directly to use it for exit criteria. Current Behaviour - It allow us to use either custom event or audience based exit criteria
Description - We need approval process in more detailed way instead of simple way like the current limited availability. We want to choose the approval policy during approval process or select the user directly from approval process. Why is this feature important to you - We have 4eye check in our organization where it will be assigned to specific person, it will record as log as well. so it is important for us.How would you like the feature to work - Expect to select the user directly during the request approval process instead of approval policy. otherwise, we need option to select the approval policy if we can create more than one in the backendCurrent Behaviour - Based on approval policy for a whole sandbox, it will process the approval process.
Description -We use a specific naming convention for our Journeys and Messages. Based on these, we can quickly determine if this is an offer or if it's an update. We want to be able to cap the number of offers sent to a customer but not the number of updates sent. As such, we need to be able to set the Caps based on our naming, not just if this is an marketing or transactional email. Why is this feature important to you -We cannot scale decentralized marketing without these types of guardrails. Current Behaviour - can only cap based on marketing or transactional emails.
Description -In AEP/AJO we can see the events on the customer profile, however it would be beneficial to be able to see just summary of specific event types. Why is this feature important to you -Need to see a summary of the customers email experience within the AJO tool. How would you like the feature to work -1) Either an additional tab, that shows all sent/delivered emails to a customer - with their open/click. This would use the Journey & Message Name, with a link to view the journey. Current Behaviour - only able to see a list of message feedback events in the profile, which does not include the journey names only the Journey IDs. No Abiltiy to filter by event type, so just endless scrolling.
Description -Enable AJO to perform email content generation from a template without needing to also deliver this email directly, enabling use of the AJO templating when interfacing with third part APIs to deliver content. Why is this feature important to you -Lack of support for attachments in AJO means these emails must flow via a third party (eg InfoBip). Having the option to generate email body content from templates using content fragments and conditional content would enable all our personalisation and content activities to remain within AJO but with the delivery and attachment handling handed off to a third party. How would you like the feature to work -A variant of the Email action should be available which generates email body content and stores it in a variable which can later be used in another action to pass to the third party API. Current Behaviour -Templates can be extracted from AJO by other platforms however this is the "raw" template with references to content fragments and all special markup for conditional content. Only "simple" templates can be shared and used outside AJO making it simpler to move the templating to the other platform and simply pass across additional attributes such as segment membership to enable conditional content rendering within the other platform.
currently there is only way to subscribe to a subscription list via landing page. Subscription list is a powerful feature that AJO offer but it's hindered by limiting it's ability only for landing page use cases. My suggestion it to enable the update activity in journey to use subscription list to subscribe from journey and also to have a history of tracking when a profile unsubscribed from list and when a profile subscribed, the trail will help us debugging and have a tracking details to help on prod issues like accidental un subscriptions from landing pages. https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/journey-optimizer/using/landing-pages/subscription-list
DescriptionWhen setting up transactional campaigns for sending out transactional emails containing contextual data, it is currently not possible to simulate the email with contextual data. That means that if a receipt is made up from contextual data points, we will have to simulate the final email by sending in API calls. That is an issue when changing something in an email that is already live, since our only option to test it is to then hope for the best, set it live and see how it looks. Instead we "could" copy the campaign to test an entirely new campaign, but that seems kind of overkill if we are simply aiming to making small adjustments to the live receipt. Why is this feature important to youThe workflow of making changes to a live transactional email with contextual data and testing those changes is very heavy and time consuming. How would you like the feature to workWould like to be able to modify an existing live transactional campaign containing contextual data and simulate the email including contextual data points. 4 Current BehaviourCurrently not possible. I can only simulate the content from a test profile but not include any contextual parameters. Only option today is either duplicating the campaign -> make the changes -> -> send in test API calls to see if the contextual data behaves and the entirety of the email.
We are missing some kind of feedback from the system after uploaded a list with the list upload feature. It would be nice to know how many rows has been uploaded (number of customers) had there been any rowns declined in the process, how many of the uploaded customer match a row in AJO. This is imported to know because we want to know if there is any ban data in the list, or if there of any reason is a mismatch between list and customers - and can then explore why. Today there is non feedback given. The feedback could be given in a popup or a report window after the import is done, and/or it can be sent be email. We have little or no control of what happens with the data vi import.
To day we are facing a challenge with the audience threshold. Many audiences is created to be used in offers and Journeys in an AdHoc activity, and is not deleted and not set as inactive. Why is it like that, maybe because it is a to manual routine to remember from day to day. And it could also bee some amount of work if the activity is high every month - remember all audiences been used and who do inactivate or not. To save time and have better control over the audiences in use, and keep us under the threshold we have been looking for a new feature. What if there has been a possibility to set a "end data" when you create a audience (optional) . This date can then be set to be after your activity has ended, and the audiences that shall not be used anymore at this time is automatically set to inactive. This will save time for the users and it will save pressure in the system - by having more audiences in an inactive status.
Description -In case we need to stop and restart journeys due to e.g. issues there are profiles which were left out. We need to find a way to process these profiles and get them included in the journey afterwards because they will not be selected by the audience anymore due to the chosen criterias.Why is this feature important to you -Otherwise we will miss profiles/customer in the journey and therefore the chance to contact them. This will crash their whole customer life cycle.How would you like the feature to work -Have the possibilty to include an audience as a kind of one time import.Current Behaviour -We need to create a copy of the journey with an adjusted audience and let it run only once.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
