Build better products with our product team
Description : When large values are shown as long strings of digits it slows comprehension and increases the chance of misreading. Replacing long zeros with readable units like 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 and 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 for counts and 𝗠𝗕 𝗚𝗕 𝗧𝗕 for data size will make licence pages clearer and faster to use. Why is this feature important to you :𝗖𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 ✅Teams must validate entitlements at a glance during renewals audits and governance checks. Human eyes scan better with semantic units like 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 and 𝗚𝗕 𝗧𝗕 rather than counting zeros. This reduces review time supports accurate decisions and improves confidence across stakeholders 📊 How would you like the feature to work :Display large counts using compact units 𝗸 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 with hover or tap to reveal the exact numberShow data size using 𝗠𝗕 𝗚𝗕 𝗧𝗕 and allow switching to bytes when neededProvide a small toggle on the page to choose 𝗿𝗮𝘄 𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝘀 or 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘀Maintain consistent formatting across tables cards and summaries for a cohesive experience Current Behaviour :Today many licence fields show values like 1000000000 or 1048576 which are hard to parse quickly and prone to misread especially under time pressure. The absence of unit formatting and toggles creates friction and slows audits and planning.
Description - Option to Customize Template when Converting Issue from a Template (and when creating a Project from a Template)Why is this feature important to you - This allows for flexibility on having more generic templates and minimizing the number of Templates to maintainHow would you like the feature to work - Just like it happens when a Template is attached after Project creationCurrent Behaviour - Customization only happens after project creation, but not during Project Creation from Template or Issue conversion
Field Mapping between CRM (Salesforce) and Marketo currently remains in perpetuity, disabling the Marketo Admin's ability to remove (or merge) a field if it has ever been mapped to a Salesforce field. A client of mine was just informed on a support call that this field mapping cannot be deleted from Field Mapping, and once a Salesforce field has been mapped it must remain. Salesforce admins consistently over-permission fields to the Marketo Sync User, which creates incredible amounts of technical debt and sync backlog issues for Admins. Our current solution is to get our Salesforce admins to remove Field Level Security (FLS) permissions from within Salesforce, which addresses only part of the problem. However, we have no means in Marketo of removing the field association within Marketo Admin so that we can remove the technical debt (the field that was errantly created) on our side. Please allow Marketo Admins, either via Support or via a UI mechanism, to be able to delete or remap fields in the UI outside of the initial sync. This is a limitation for admins that needs to be addressed.
Some time ago, Adobe recommended using the “share with a friend” option, but this feature is no longer available:https://nation.marketo.com/t5/product-blogs/deprecation-of-forward-to-a-friend/ba-p/358045#:~:text=As%20of%20September%2029%2C%202025%2C%20the%20Forward%20to,been%20or%20will%20be%20sent%20using%20the%20token. We need a way to share emails with internal personnel for review before sending them out. Since we are working with the new email designer, we must avoid adding employees as additional contacts in Marketo, as these would count against our license.
Description:Introduce an option in Adobe Analytics Workspace filters (e.g., dropdown segments, panel filters) to enforce single selection only so users cannot apply more than one filter value at the same time. Why is this feature important to you:When users multi‑select from a dropdown filter or segment, some reports produce incorrect or misleading values. As an example, we use segments to isolate our Web and App experiences. However if a user selects both of these from a dropdown, they will get inaccurate values in the data set. Similarly, during gradual rollouts, mixing two experiences into one selection can lead the stakeholder to make decisions based on inaccurate values. A single‑selection restriction would ensure data integrity, especially in decision‑critical scenarios such as product rollouts. How would you like the feature to workAdd a setting to the filter/dropdown component in Workspace (e.g., a checkbox “Limit selection to one value”). When enabled, the filter behaves like a radio button list so selecting a new value automatically deselects the previous one. This should work for dimensions, segments, and metrics where dropdowns are used.Current BehaviourWorkspace filters and dropdown segments allow multiple selections by default. The “Require selection” option only forces one or more selections, not exactly one. There is no native way to prevent multi‑select, forcing workarounds like separate panels or project links.
We’ve seen a sharp spike in unsubscribe rates in recent months. Unsubscribe logs show users being marked as unsubscribed across multiple emails (see image), with entries spaced just 5 minutes apart—this does not reflect actual user behavior. This issue began in June 2025, coinciding with the rollout of one-click unsubscribe by major email providers. It now inflates unsubscribe metrics, distorts performance data, and raises serious concerns about potential domain reputation impact. Other Marketo customers are reporting the same problem. This is more than noise in analytics—it’s a systemic issue that demands urgent investigation and resolution.
Description - Datastreams are required to set access type to Mixed Authentication to allow unauthenticated requests from AEP web or mobile SDK https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/datastreams/configure. My understanding is edge network validates ECID, environment id, org id and other non-cryptographic-secrets to ensure request is not bogus, but does not care where the request is coming from. Can we have the option for authenticated access type to protect our datastream from spoofing attacks? Why is this feature important to you -Our organization has security requirement for this. Data passed from mobile SDK to datastream contains sensitive customer data, that if unprotected can expose notifications intended for our customers to unauthorized third parties, and possibly fraud activities. In my country, there are federal cybersecurity guidelines and laws that govern how we handle customer data. How would you like the feature to work -Have the option to configure authenticated communication between AEP mobile SDK and edge network for data collection. Either mTLS or OAuth 2.0 Client Credentials flow works for us. Current Behaviour -To use AEP mobile SDK, datastreams are required to set access type to Mixed Authentication to allow unauthenticated requests https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/datastreams/configure
Description -Why is this feature important to you - When working with multiple user groups that have different roles, this feature will allow admins to restrict the custom form visibility based on sections that are relevant to a specific user group and not everyone. This will also help in restricting visibility of confidential information instead of creating new custom form for different user groups. How would you like the feature to work - The feature should have the ability to adjust the visibility of a custom form section to only a specific group and not be visible to other users who have access to the custom form. For eg. A custom form has two sections, section A and section B and the custom for is shared with group A and B. With this feature, section A should not be visible for group B and section B should no be visible for group A. Current Behaviour - There is no option to share a section and adjust the visibility for users on the custom form.
Description -Fusion convertProject module currently does not maintain the same order of custom forms when converted from a template. How would you like the feature to work - By default, when the issues are converted to either projects, it will nice to have the order of the custom forms is same as the template that is used to convert to project.Current Behaviour - It currently does not maintain the same order
Description -Task / Project / Issue description field to have text editor / formatting options (Bold, Italics, Underline, add image etc) like Comments sectionWhy is this feature important to you - To create structured content, To improve readabilityHow would you like the feature to work - Similar to the Comments sectionCurrent Behaviour - Text with no formatting
Hi, we are using data warehouse exports.The Files that we are receiving a quite big -> in avg. 1GB on hourly basis. Our db don't support ZIP format (the same like Athena, Redshift, Snowflake etc.), so we need to convert the files first in GZIP. Since unzip large files consumes a lot of time & ressources, we would like to submit an idea:- add the gzip compression format to the exports- split large files automatically (like in Data Feeds) into smaller chunks of gzip files. It's actually the same way Data Feeds currently exports the data. Cheers,Piotr
DescriptionIn a scatter plot we usually have two metrics and one is usually the independent one and the other dependant. In a line chart we have the ability to add various trend lines. It would be great to have the ability to fit a linear regression line to the scatter plotWhy is this feature important to youThis would provide the ability to spot relationships and trends between two metrics and highlight value that are outliers, either way above or below the line. This data can greatly help drive business decisions. How would you like the feature to workAdd option under the viz configuration "cog" to turn linear regression line on or off
Description - When a "Read Only" viewer accesses a Proof, the system creates a new Stage with "No Deadline." This causes the Proof to be showng as having No Deadline in our Reporting.Why is this feature important to you - We need to be able to accurately track and report out on our Proofing.How would you like the feature to work - We would prefer that the New Stage not wipe out the Proof Deadline in Reporting.Current Behaviour - The current behavior is that the New Stage is listed with "No Deadline" and so then the Proof appears with "No Deadline" in our Reporting.
Workfront offers out-of-the-box integration with cloud storage providers like Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, and SharePoint. However, it does not natively integrate with Egnyte. Many of our clients rely on Egnyte for document management, and having native integration with Egnyte would greatly enhance productivity. Although Workfront supports ‘Custom Integrations,’ integrating with Egnyte currently requires purchasing a license for an Egnyte plugin. We request a feature enhancement to add native integration with Egnyte in Workfront, similar to the existing functionality for the other listed providers.
Description - Include a live link to the Project Level in the Board cardsWhy is this feature important to you - Users organize cards from Tasks in Kanban boards and many times they need information found at the Project Level Custom Form. Currently, the users need to utilize the live connection that takes them to the actual Task and then use the breadcrumbs to go up to the Project. How would you like the feature to work - It'd be great if the cards can be configured to display a live link to the source Project. Current Behavior -Currently, the Project Name or its url can be added but they are not clickable to the object.
The idea is to allow adding updates/comments to tasks through the inline edit functionality. We use a backlog project to manage multiple backlog tasks and need to add grooming notes to each of the tasks every week. We do this using the inline edit function on a task view. While we have been using a custom text field which enables us to edit line, it would be great if we could add a new update/comment using inline edit. Ideally, we would be able to add updates/comments when we are inline edit mode. When saved the newly added update/comment would land in the updates section of the task. When not in edit mode the column should show the last update. Currently, there is no way to edit/add comments using inline edit on a task view.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Cross Program Content Copy in AEM as a Cloud Service Use-case: We are looking to copy content between two environments across different programs, such as from Environment A in Program A to Environment B in Program B. Currently, the content copy tool only supports content transfer within the same program ID, which limits this capability. Current/Experienced Behavior: The AEM Content Copy Tool is designed for content movement within the same Cloud Manager program. Transferring content across different programs is not supported.- Adobe does not provide an out-of-the-box solution for cross-program content migration to maintain content integrity and security. Improved/Expected Behavior: We are looking to copy content between two environments across different programs, such as from Environment A in Program A to Environment B in Program B. Currently, the content copy tool only supports content transfer within the same program ID, which limits this capability. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service - 2024.10 Customer-name/Organization name: Air India Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
As a marketing team who has been using Adobe Sites, Assets, and Guides for several years prior to adopting Workfront we have developed a complex and highly used marketing taxonomy using AEM Tags in the Adobe Experience Manager platform. Instead of rebuilding or migrating our metadata taxonomy framework into another system it would be beneficial from a time and consistency perspective to use that same marketing taxonomy tag structure in Workfront, so that we can manage the marketing taxonomy in one location for multiple Adobe technologies.
Having the descriptive text show in black makes it looks just like the text that exists elsewhere on the form. Often this text is used for instructions and having it the same color as form field answers is confusing and hard to read. A simple option would work here as well. Either black or gray as a selection.
Description - It would be a good idea to publish documentation about the plan mode feature on the project landing page. Why is this feature important to you - Project Managers, when shown this feature, really like what it can do, and they ask for documentation on how it works but there is none. How would you like the feature to work - I would like that there is documentation on this feature available, including - that it exists, how to access it, and an explanation of how it works. Current Behaviour - There is no documentation and support suggested it be raised as an 'idea'
機能改善要求（RFE）概要： There is a Content Tree on the left side of the CF Console. When there are many folders here, I would like to have only the folders that contain Content Fragments displayed by default so that I can access folders that contain Content Fragments quickly. There are many folders with similar names, and since only part of the names are displayed, it is difficult to distinguish which folders contain Content Fragments.Providing a checkbox to toggle the visibility of folders that do not contain Content Fragments could be a good option. @arunpatidar ユースケース： Filtering Content Fragments 現在／体験した動作： I often get lost trying to navigate to the correct path. 改善／期待される動作： Faster path selection reduces unnecessary actions. 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： AEM As a Cloud Service 顧客名／組織名 スクリーンショット（ある場合） コードパッケージ（ある場合）
Allow system admins and project owners to MOVE entire comment/update threads to a different task, project, request or program.Issue: Many users plop comments in the wrong location which causes much confusion among team members. Then it is exacerbated by people replying to the comments.Yes, we can copy the thread or copy the text, but this is still not enough because people still go to the old/wrong location.
Description -We have users who do not need to log time based on their job level. For those users, we didn't apply a timesheet profile. Now we have some users were who logging time but due to recent job role changes are now not required to log time. I went to change their timesheet profile to remove it and with the new UI updates, it does not allow me to do so. It only always you to choose another timesheet profile. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the ability to completely remove or clear a timesheet profile from a user’s profile in the UI. Ideally, there should be an option to select “none” or leave the field blank, so that no timesheet is generated for those users who do not need to log time. Current Behaviour -Currently, the new UI does not allow clearing or removing a timesheet profile from a user’s profile. Instead, it requires assigning a different profile, with no option to set it to “none.” Support has confirmed this is a known limitation affecting multiple customers. They provided a workaround below, but it is more time-consuming and less efficient. Allowing administrators to remove timesheet profiles directly in the UI would simplify the process and improve usability. From Support: Best workaround here would be to create a “No Timesheet Required” profile to act as a replacement for these users. You could do this by creating a dummy timesheet profile (e.g., “No Timesheet Required”) with settings that do not generate timesheets or have no approvers/hours types. Then assign this profile to users who should not log time. You will then want to update your “no logged time” reports to exclude users assigned to this profile.
Description - When requests are assigned to a team the requests drop off after a two week planned completion date.Why is this feature important to you - Assigned teams may have a backlog of requests and once the two week timeline they lose sight of the requests.How would you like the feature to work - Create a filter to have team requests display with certain criteria and have the planned completion date be adjustable.Current Behaviour - Team requests disappear after two weeks from planned completion date of request.
Description - Have the date range comparisons update to align with selected dates for current time period regardless of date granularity and without need to go into the settings and adjustment comparison time periods Why is this feature important to you - allows for fewer and more flexible reports to be built for the teamHow would you like the feature to work - the custom time period is based on both the first and last date in the selection and updates automatically as the date range is updatedCurrent Behaviour - locked to the start date and requires going into the time range settings and adjusting the rolling time periods (much too complex for basic business user)
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
