Description:We need be able to identify irregularities/defects in our ecommerce business (declines in web traffic/sales/conversion).Using Alerts (both daily and hourly) with segments applied helps our teams triage in root cause analysis and investigations.Some of our hourly alerts trigger frequently if the criteria are met, most often during hours of the day where a large portion of our website/app visitors and purchasers are not browsing or purchasing. Why is this feature important to youWe are receiving specific hourly alerts for certain use cases more often then we would like.We have leadership and other stakeholders that have requested to receive these alerts, but we do not want to add them to the distribution until we can control the frequency to exclude these known instances from firing. We want to prevent the integrity of the Alerts tool from being deemed inaccurate and irrelevant as a result of this. How we would like the feature to workWe would like to have a dropdown filter to select specific hours of the day to exclude the hourly alert from triggering for. Alternatively, if we can apply apply a segment that excludes specific hours of the day from being included that would work.With current behavior of applying a segment using either of the criteria below still yields triggering an alert during the 3AM, 4AM or 5AM hours of the day.Logic Option 1: Exclude Hit where Hour of Day = 3AM OR 4AM OR 5AM Logic Option 2: Include Hit where Hour of Day = 12AM OR 1AM OR 2AM OR 6AM OR 7AM OR 8AM OR 9AM OR 10AM OR 11AM OR 12PM OR 1PM OR 2PM OR 3PM OR 4PM OR 5PM OR 6PM OR 7PM OR 8PM OR 9PM OR 10PM OR 11PM
Hi All. I hope things are going well. I had an idea I was hoping you could consider. It seems that the OOTB functionality of the AEP data processing from a Web SDK implementation includes converting the user's IP address into the Designated Marketing Area Identifier (DMA ID). This identifier is part of the Web SDK Experience Event Field Group and again is provided by Adobe automatically, meaning this is NOT something we set or configure within the Web SDK itself (if you exclude "turning the feature on" within the Data stream and Web SDK extension). The values within this field look like numbers - for the US based visitors505, 506, 507, etc The problem with this field is it's data type. It's set up as an "integer" field, not a text string For example, ID = 505 is actually the Detroit MI area. but there is no 'DMA Name' field in AEP, just the DMA ID. So running a report in AEP Query Services or CJA and getting a 505 number is not helpful to our analysts. We need to translate the ID 505 into Detroit. The problem is since the field is set up as an integer we are not able to classify it. We've tried setting up an AEP Lookup Table, but you can not set up a Relationship between two dataset when you're dealing with 'integer' fields, the keys that connect tables together must be 'string' values. We tried converting the DMA ID integer into a String using the Data Prep Mapping Services, but it seems the DMA ID doesn't yet exist or isn't accessible by the Data Prep tools so those efforts also failed. We tired using CJA Lookup capability within Derived Fields and we after 4 business days can't seem to get our DMA Dataset connected to our CJA Connection... the tool just won't process the dataset because we can't set the DMA ID field as an 'identity field' because it's an integer data type. So our idea is:- to have Adobe add the DMA Name field to the field group and then update the DMA processing to also populate the DMA Name field automatically without the need for us to 'classify' the DMA ID- if that's not possible, we'd like Adobe to update the Web SDK Experience Event Field Group so that the DMA ID field data type is a 'string' instead of an 'integer'. - If that is not possible without impacting already existing customer who are using that Field Group, then we ask that you expose the DMA ID field to the Data Prep services so we can manually create a rule that will convert the integer field into a string field. - If that's not possible due to the way AEP processes data, then we ask that Adobe provide a solution to calculate the DMA within the Web SDK Extension or Adobe Data Collection Data Element so we can set our own custom field in our Schema to collect the DMA ID as a string value (so we can classify it within AEP / CJA) I hope that all made sense
I would like to be able to customize the label of a field on each form but keep the back end for reporting. Similar to how we can customize statuses per group but the 3 letter code can remain the same. We can then manage the same pick list and back end data but have the label (aka user facing) make sense to each group.
Description - Enable reviewers providing feedback on docs / proofs to be anonymous, so the feedback can be seen but not their name. Even though the feedback is anonymous, still want to be able to report on the specific users engagement (eg: User 1 reviewed 4 proofs) but the feedback they provided should be anonymous outside of System Admin level. Why is this feature important to you - We have certain processes (like DE&I) that require anonymity for feedback providers, in order to create a safe space for their feedback & increase comfortably with providing feedback. Since WF currently doesn't enable this, we are going to build their process flow in AirTable. We How would you like the feature to work - Be able to select if the feedback being provided should be anonymous or not. If yes, have it turned on for a full process/proofs. Still ensure the engagement can be tracked via reporting however for each user. Current Behaviour - Shows everyones name whose provided feedback.
Description - Create a way to pull or use data from Fusion operations."How many times has a scenario/module been run?""Can I use runID to track and check against operations in an integrated system?""Who is triggering the scenarios the most?""Did Fusion even exist before 30 days ago?" Why is this feature important to you? - This would help us optimize existing scenarios through usage data and build better solutions with integrated systems. How would you like the feature to work? - It would be great if it was as straightforward as Workfront's reporting, but no specific implementation requirements. Just having access to the data would be extremely helpful. Current Behaviour - We can manually check runs that have happened in the past 30 days. Checking this way is very manual and tedious at best, and only shows data from the specific run. Any sort of aggregate data would have to be manually tallied and synthesized.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - it was extremely beneficial to see the unassigned work on the same page as assigned work, this was allocation was much simpler to see who could take on work.How would you like the feature to work - just as it had beforeCurrent Behaviour - you're not able to review the team report for workload balancer for both unassigned work and assigned work. Unassigned work is not visible by job role.
Description - The ability for a workspace owner or editor to hide/unhide selected panels in workspace.Why is this feature important to you - Would allow me to condense what is visible for users that only requires a certain area of a template or workspace without outright removing panels. Would also allow for a space to workout a thought or a theory without muddying the report.How would you like the feature to work - Function should be the same as hidden tabs in excel Right click on a panel header to find the option to hide/unhide panels. Current Behavior - Panels can be minimized but anything you don't want shown needs to be in another report or deleted from the workspace.
Description - Have Workload Balancer free up hours for users if not usedWhy is this feature important to you – Right now if a user estimates 20 hour on a request, logs 5 hours and the request is either cancelled or completed, the user is still allocated for 20 hours even though 15 hours have freed up. Doing that over multiple requests could free up much time as estimated is always off some.How would you like the feature to work – If a user estimates 20 hours and logs 5 hours and the request is complete or cancelled, then the remaining 15 hours availability should be freed up for that user to be able to assign additional work.
Description - I would love to see consistency when I'm applying same choices from multi-select dropdown to an item listed in a report (e.g. task). Let's say dropdown has 3 options: 1,2,3. Depending on in which order they will be applied against task they may appear in random order: 1,3,2; 3,2,1; 3,1,2 etc. According to WF support randomness is per design. Why is this feature important to you - Consistency in listing items makes it easier to read field values How would you like the feature to work - Regardless of the order in which I select dropdown values, if I select the same values I would like to see them display consistently, as 1,2,3. Keep it consistent. Current Behaviour - randomness
Description - Our users would like to be able to 'lock' fields on projects and make them only editable by certain users. Right now there doesn't appear to be any functionality that accomplishes this. For example, the PM may want to 'lock' the Duration field so only specified users can update that field. Right now, anyone with Contribute or Manage access to the project is able to adjust those values. Or anyone with View access that has a Task level assignment. These permissions vary from project to project so we would like to be able to set these permissions on the object itself, and not as an Enterprise level rule. Why is this feature important to you - This is important for data integrity. Not all users should have access to edit all fields just because they have access to a project. How would you like the feature to work - I envision some type of 'lock' or 'share' button on the field that allows us to set permissions for that particular field. This would supersede any Project level permissions. Ie: User John has Contribute access to the Project but only has View access to the 'Duration' field.
Be able to generate timeline view in detail for the entire project. I want to be able to color code each task on the timeline. I want to be able to see subtasks within the larger task on the timeline. I want to be able to see milestones and a marker for today's date on the timeline. MS project has these functionalities.
Description - Our custom form fields were created 11 years ago and over the years things have changed and several field formats need to be changed, however, as of right now, there is not an easy way to change the format of a custom form fields without losing historical data (ex: changing a field from a drop down to a free text field)Why is this feature important to you - allows users to adapt new workflows or changes in workflows without losing historical dataHow would you like the feature to work - Allow field format to be changed without losing historical dataCurrent Behaviour - currently a form field format cannot be changed once it is created.
Hello, This is a feature request to add annotations in all trended displays in AA and CJA. Right now, I believe I can only see annotations in "line" charts. But I can see that it would be also valuable to see annotations in: combo displaysarea displaysbar displaysetc.Sorry if this is in the wrong spot. Will move this if needed.
Description - Tracking changes to the name and status of the projects that present what the changes was (old to new) and when it happened. Why is this feature important to you - Executives need reports on changes that happened to the project status, for example, how projects changed status during the past month, and from what status to what status. The purpose is to report changes that happened within the portfolio since last portfolio meeting: for example, how many projects went in progress, on hold, completed, etc., during the past 2-3 months. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to track changes to the name , status, and some other attributes of the projects that are captured in custom fields. Journal entry field allows some of the tracking but it is not for all and not intuitive. Also, journal entry fields cannot be accessed through custom forms if I try to create custom fields based on them. Current Behaviour - Journal entry field allows some of the tracking but it is not for all and not intuitive. Also, journal entry fields cannot be accessed through custom forms if I try to create custom fields based on them. Also, while changes of status from in progress to completion and from entry to in progress can be tracked and demonstrated by creating reports Entry Date and Completion Date, there is no way to track other statuses a project goes through its lifecycle.
Due to the new timesheet UI, columns widths do not always fit ideally to the column content. As an example, the column width for Hour Type is fixed, but our hour types are of quite long names like "Remote working time - billable". As an consequence the hour type is not always completely visible and users use the wrong one due to missing information. Ideally the timesheet columns are dynamically adjustable by the user similar to other lists in Workfront (e.g. tasks, projects, etc.)
Description - In the Workfront mobile app, currently it is not possible to click on custom hyperlinks that have been created by users to allow them to open a new page and open the link in a new tab. When looking at the same item in the Workfront desktop view, the custom hyperlink is clickable and will open a new tab in the browser. On the app, the word 'link' simply appears but is not clickable and does not appear as a hyperlink Why is this feature important to you - Users would like to be able to access custom hyperlinks on the mobile app. Users advise this is basic functionality and without it, it does not entice staff to make use of the mobile app. How would you like the feature to work - The custom hyperlink should be saved as a clickable HTML link that will open a new tab to the hyperlink when clicked Custom hyperlink example: https://www.figma.com/proto/y6WcwPgnOp48koUHFlwVVe/Ford?page-id=2147%3A86&type=design&node-id=2147-2291&viewport=1694%2C-3446%2C1&t=dEf9Lb7vePF2ccF5-1&scaling=min-zoom&starting-point-node-id=2147%3A1949 Screenshot attached with a marker signifying where the hyperlink is
I understand that changing the timezone impacts how things are displayed. The issue is that the user marked 3 work days of PTO this week, and asked me to shift tasks off of those days. When I went to the Workload Balancer, it was not showing me that the user had taken three work days off PTO it only shows two. Then when you go to the users PTO page, it shows five. How am I supposed to capacity plan when im seeing three different values for a user’s PTO? Is the expected behavior that anyone doing resource balancing has to change the time zone of their laptop in order to see accurate data? When you're trying to manage the workload for dozens of resources, flipping timezones on your computer to 'check if anyone in india selected PTOs' on a daily basis IS RIDICULOUS. I'm okay with the display being slightly off b/c of the time difference. BUT THIS is actually missing to display accurately. I should see 3 days worth of PTO in the workload balancer, not TWO.
Description - allow System Administrators to change task statuses implicitly without restrictions based on the project's statusWhy is this feature important to you - as a System Administrator, cleanup is part of my every day job. While one could wish for users who mark their tasks as Cancelled before updating the project to Cancelled, this isn't always realistic. It would be great if I could just use a report of all tasks in New or In Progress status that are in a project of Cancelled and update them all in a couple of clicks.How would you like the feature to work - when a System Administrator is attempting to update the status of a task in a Cancelled project, either allow this change to happen without issue, or show a pop-up window first asking the user if this is what they'd like to do (for example, "A task's status cannot be modified for a project with a status of Cancelled. As a System Administrator, you can override this. Do you wish to proceed?" - this is similar to pop-ups in Smartsheet).Current Behaviour - currently, you have to take the project status out of Cancelled to be able to update the tasks' statuses. This creates many clicks and much manual effort, going into each Cancelled project first, as it cannot be done via a task report.
For projects where we bill the customer based on time and materials, our users usually setup custom billing rates for each job role within their projects. It works properly for task hours, but it doesn't work for issue hours or project hours. Our users often record a lot of hours in issues, and this results in creating incorrect billing records. This request is to make it possible to apply those custom job role billing rates for all hours within the project, not just tasks. Here is the documentation for the current behavior:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/manage-work/projects/project-finances/override-role-billing-rates-and-calculate-project-revenue
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We create a new page under /content/soucedcode/language-masters/en called home . Within this page, we will drag in an Experience Fragment Component with the XFPath. In this scenario, we have XFPath = /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/en/button/masterWhen we language or live copy pages, the XFPaths should be updated as expected, but it is not. Now let's continue with the scenario. Please note that we have the entire structure of the XF created - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/en/button/master - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master- /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/master - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/en/button/master - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/fr/button/master- /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/us/es/button/masterNow after when the new page is created in language-masters, we will start performing the language copy /content/soucedcode/language-masters/en/home TO->> - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/fr/home - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/es/homeWe expect the referenced experience fragments to change the references with the correct values below, and it looks like it works as expected from here: - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/es/home == XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/masterOkay now we are going to roll out the language copies pages to the different countries. Since these language copies are actually live copies within the language folders, the roll out mechanism will work as expected. Target pages: - /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr- /content/sourcedcode/us/es(Expected Results)After the roll out, we expect that the experience fragments should have the XFPaths localized like the configurations below. In a perfect world the Live Copy and Language Copy mechanism should update the XFPaths as expected like what we see below:- /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/us/es/button/master(Actual Results)In actual results, we are seeing that the XFPaths are not localized, and is referencing to the language-masters paths: - /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/master Use-case: We have pages created in language masters which has an experience fragment inside of it. The experience fragment is referencing to the experience fragments language-masters path. When we Roll Out or Language Copy pages, we expect the references to update to the non language-masters structure. Current/Experienced Behavior: (Actual Results)In actual results, we are seeing that the XFPaths are not localized after Roll Out or Language Copy executions. Look at this, this is still referencing to the language-masters paths: - /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/master Improved/Expected Behavior: (Expected Results)After the Roll Out or Language Copy, we expect that the experience fragments should have the XFPaths localized like the configurations below. In a perfect world the Live Copy and Language Copy mechanism should update the XFPaths as expected like what we see below:- /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/us/es/button/master Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Latest AEMaaCS and AEM 6.5 SP Packs Customer-name/Organization name: NULL Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
It would be helpful if "pinned" projects/tasks could appear at the top if timesheet or there could be any sort of views, groupings, or filters added.
Currently, all feeds must be created through the UI. It takes a lot of man hours to create and validate a new feed. It would be a nice for Adobe to expose an API which we can manage our data feeds programmatically and automatically. Thanks
Description - Data Sets in AEP (expecially Prod sandbox) are extremely important assets. There should be a rigid process on its deletion, just like Report Suite in AA.Why is this feature important to you - I think no one wants to have its Data Set in Prod sandbox to be deleted easily.How would you like the feature to work - The deletion should involve Adobe tech support, as the final gate keeper.Current Behaviour - With the proper permission, admin can just delete Data Sets easily. Thanks.John
Certain types of requests (queue topics in some cases) require a document to be included in the request to pass initial assessment in traffic before being approved. The ability to force an attachment of some sort would stop the requester from submitting the request (like you do with required fields) without the attachment and save back and forth time for the request to be approved to begin work or be assigned out to a team.
The "Action Needed" daily digest email shows both already-completed actions and outstanding actions. It does not, however, state which action is what type (open or completed). The problem is that the wording - "Action Needed" - leads users to think that it won't include actions that have been already been completed, when in fact these are readily included in the digest. Please can this be fixed!
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
