Adobe Workfront General

While I tried to filter users, I set the option EmployeeCode, and selected “Is Any Of” and pasted 1000 user employee codes, it broke the page. It should not be like that, if it cannot process the filter it should show a warning or say something instead of being unusable, even when reloading the browser did not work.

My team needs to see more information on cards within boards. Simple interface improvements would make a hugeeee difference! Improve colors (not just a little box) See planned hr/story points See status of tasks under that card

Problem StatementCustomers are reporting color discoloration and washed-out rendering in Workfront Proof that does not match the original processed creative assets. This issue is particularly visible in color-sensitive review and approval workflows where proof accuracy is critical for validation and sign-off.The issue appears to be related to changes previously made to support overprinting and multi-layer PDF rendering. While the prior enhancement resolved a separate issue involving varnish and multi-layer content not rendering correctly (Reference: #00442736 - Environment Discrepancy: Varnish Layers Failing to Render in Capital One Proofing Viewer), customers are now experiencing color discrepancies that may be an unintended side effect of those rendering adjustments.Business ImpactReduces trust in Workfront Proof as an accurate representation of final creative assets. Creates confusion during review and approval workflows. Impacts customers with color-critical use cases, including pr

We would like to move to Adobe Cloud Storage so we can take advantage of the new Unified Approvals with Frame.io. However, doing so would require us to manually recreate all of our Workfront Legacy project templates—more than 200 in total. While I understand that projects can be created manually from a legacy template, that does not meet our needs because we use Fusion and Kickstart to load most of our projects. In addition, each template includes required fields within forms that cannot be completed until the project reaches specific tasks. Currently, there does not appear to be a way to manually create a project without completing all required fields. The folder structure also does not carry over to a cloud project, so that would need to be recreated manually for each project. Is the ability to copy project templates to Adobe Cloud Storage on the roadmap? If we need to recreate the folders manually, that would be manageable; our main concern is avoiding the need to manually rebuild m

My team has noticed that Workfront now defaults to showing AI Suggestions when attempting to link AEM folders to Workfront projects. The “suggestions” take up most of the screen and make it harder to find the folders we’re looking for (even when we “hide” the suggestions). Additionally, more often than not, we are “hiding” the suggestions as they are not very helpful. It would be nice if we were able to turn this feature off while retaining access to other AI features in the application. Ideally, this would be a setting that the user could change in their preferences (rather than turning the feature on/off across the whole organization). 

When creating Layout Templates in the New Workfront Experience, we're currently limited to only being able to pin Main Menu Items or Dashboards. Ideally, we should be able to pin specific Objects on a layout template (Project/Portfolio/Report/Document/etc.).

Custom Forms are an important use-case. Many users have a need to see and/or input the Custom Form, but do NOT need to make four or more mouse clicks to get there. The current Layout Template "Tabs" feature exists, but can only incorporate "Dashboards." This proposal is to add a "Quick Pin" that allows System Admins to create/edit a Layout Template to attach a specific Custom Form. This means that a specified user could have a default view that is directly and specifically to a Custom Form.

Description -Enable any URL to be added as  pin on the layout template page.Current Behavior -Currently, from the layout template, we can only pin dashboards or standard pages also accessible trough the "Waffle Menu".Why is this feature important to you -This has introduced the need for admins to go in to every new user and manually pin a specific board to their home page.How would you like the feature to work -At the layout template page, allow users to enter a URL to the pins. 

Description - While viewing all Project Tasks, having a dedicated Field/Column for logging Task HoursWhy This Feature is Important - Having the ability to log hours directly from the Project Tasks page and not needing to navigate to either the Task itself, or the Open Summary tab would be incredibly helpful. This would reduce User effort in logging time, while also removing any possible confusion for new Users navigating to the Task, and back to the Project, or navigation within the Open Summary tab.How the Feature Would Work - Added Field/Column to the standard Project View as a place for Users to log hours. This could be done via a button similar to the Status Icons that directly opens the ‘Log Time’ panel (without leaving the Project page). Alternatively this could be a Field where Users enter a numerical value that is then added to their Actual hours, and then removed from the Field. Current Behavior - Currently, Users need to navigate to the Task itself to log hours, or use the Op

One of the challenges we're trying to address is the amount of manual effort required for users to complete and submit multiple intake forms in Workfront at a time. To help streamline this process, we are exploring a solution that would leverage a custom web service and Workfront APIs to help automate the completion and submission of custom forms. The goal is to enable users to submit multiple intake requests programmatically while still adhering to the business rules and user experience defined within the Workfront custom forms. As part of an enhancement feature, would it be possible to allow API access to the display logic (e.g., cascading rules/conditional visibility) and/or other methods to retrieve the display logic within the custom intake forms?

Description - Before the migration to Adobe console, we were able to have two email addresses associated to each Workfront account. One email (FedID) is what our users used to login through SSO and the other (Username) is where their email notifications from Workfront went. With console this is now no longer possible and support has been unable to suggest a workaround. Would love to see this functionality restored! Why is this feature important to you - Some of our users need their notifications routed to a shared inbox for coverage purposes/so it is easy to jump in and help each other with workloads.  How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to have a field on the user profile again where I can input an email to send Workfront notifications to.  Current Behavior - Functionality no longer exists.

Description - Would love to have the option to attach a file to a request in Planning.Why is this feature important to you - We thought we had a solution to our public facing request problem through Workfront Planning's ability to create public request links. However, the inability to attach files makes it a non-viable option for us.How would you like the feature to work - Just like in Workfront Core, we would like to have the option to attach files to requests.Current Behaviour - Currently there is no file attach option in Workfront Planning.

SummaryOur team uses Claude connected to the Workfront MCP server to answer resourcing questions in natural language. Planned Hours are fully and reliably queryable today. Remaining Available Hours — the metric the Resource Planner itself calculates (schedule capacity minus time off minus existing commitments) — is not exposed through any MCP tool, and cannot be reliably reconstructed from what is exposed. We're requesting this data be made queryable so a team's full capacity picture (Planned + Available) can be surfaced through natural-language requests, not only through the Resource Planner UI.What Works TodayPlanned Hours are cleanly queryable via the insights_find_workfront_data tool, using fields such as assignment.assignment_workRequired and task-level planned hours, grouped or filtered by user, project, or date range. This lets Claude answer questions like "how many planned hours does each person on this team have this month" accurately and immediately.The GapThe Resource Planne

In the new unified approvals, when an approval template is created, there is a field for “workdays until due date”. We need this number to exclude weekends, or at least have the ability to associate with a schedule that excludes weekends, so that approval due dates do not fall on weekends without manually adjusting the due date with the calendar feature.

It would be great if the Date field could be customized, such as being able to block or highlight specific dates when the calendar pops up.  

Currently when you unassign a user from a task/issue, it automatically fills in the assignee with that user's job role. My company has never used this feature and it just creates extra work and confusion to either remove that job role or to see it in the assignments. It would be great if this is something we could disable in the setup area.

Add function to API to add nonWorkDay (NONWKD) without needing to nest beneath an object with all other nonWorkDays. Right now to add a nonWorkDay to a schedule all existing nonWorkDays must be collected first as an array. Then the array must be added to with new dates to an edit call on the parent object. The longer the schedule is used the larger this array becomes the harder it is to confirm no errors or missed dates. 

Users need to be able to filter and organize their timesheet page. The current filter option is very limited. We'd like users to have the ability to filter, view and group on the timesheet page, similar to functionality available in other sections, where standard choices are provided and the user can add, customize and share as needed.

I believe I have seen this in another thread somewhere and wanted to check on it to see if there have been any updates around this feature but can't seem to find it.. This would be a HUGE win for us if this functionality was possible.   Description - Ability to utilize the same 'multi-choice' field on multiple custom form hiding certain choices.    Why is this feature important to you - We use the same "Asset Type" dropdown field across all of our different custom forms so that we can easily report on this data, however not all Asset Types should be an available option across all forms. For example:    How would you like the feature to work - Example: On Custom Form 1 we would like the 'Asset Types' dropdown to include Print, Email, Social, Web as options to choose from. On Custom Form 2 we would like to hide Web as an Asset Type for them to choose, and only display Print, Email, Social.    Current Behaviour - Currently (to my knowledge), yo

Description -Why is this feature important to you -Basic formatting (e.g. Bold, Italics, Underline, Superscript, Subscript) to assist with interacting with and responding to commenters How would you like the feature to work - Include the formatting in the commentsCurrent Behaviour - There is no formatting (e.g.Bold, Italics, Underline, Superscript, Subscript) in the proof commenting

It would be really useful to be able to italicise/bold/superscript copy in a comment that we want to include as new copy in a document that is being reviewed. At the moment, we need to type out the copy that is to be inserted and then add separate notes to design to let them know what is to be italicised/bold/superscripted. Also, it would be good to be able to add more that one format to the copy, e.g. italicised and bold

Hello,In the reports area, if you toggle on the option to “use shareable folders, you can’t see which reports are on a dashboard. You can only see that information if you have that toggle off. It’s not an option to add that column either when you have that toggle on. I think it would be helpful to see what dashboards the reports are on as well as the shareable folder as columns. Thanks!Mary

Wouldn’t it be great if we could customize the summary panel for Workfront Calendars?  I’ve tried to update the Summary Panel settings within Layout Templates, but it doesn’t appear to apply to calendars. Ideally, I would like to customize what fields pull into the calendar summary panel at the calendar level, rather than via a Layout Template. 

Description - When using the My Tasks widget, would like the ability to see completed tasks. Why is this feature important to you - My creative team like seeing completed tasks so they can quickly jump back to things if needed from this page.How would you like the feature to work - Allow this widget to pull in completed tasks from a preset Workfront filter or a custom filterCurrent Behavior - Currently does not display completed tasks as seen in the compare and contrast example below. Trying to use a filter that pulls in tasks from last week, this week and next week that are both not complete and complete, the widget does not seem to pull in completed tasks. My Tasks with custom filter: A report with the same custom filter:

 Please expose the Expense object type (EXPENSE / objCode: EXPNS) via the Workffont Claude connector, including fields such as description, amount, actualAmount, expenseType, plannedDate, billingRecordID, and projectID — this would allow us to pull full financial breakdowns programmatically rather than having to access the Workfront UI manually.Second, we need the ability to create and update Notes/Updates on projects and tasks via the connector — specifically, support for the Note object type with create and update operations, so we can post weekly status updates, comments, and log changes directly from the AI assistant without switching to the Workfront interface.