Adobe Workfront Fusion

I think this has already been submitted somewhere, but it would be great to have a feature where you can join branches of a scenario (router paths) back to the main scenario. For example, I have a form with a multi-select dropdown for brands; the selected brand determines who owns the issues, then other people are notified based on other form fields - those additional users are universal, but we need to create new issues for each brand. Some issues will only have one brand selected, some will have multiple that require duplicate issues to be created with different owners. It would be great to be able to check if multiple brands are selected, and if so iterate through the brands, creating new issues for each in a branch (if only one brand is selected, continue with the main scenario), then have that branch rejoin the main scenario and iterate through the issues to set the rest of the “universal” users based on the shared fields.

Description - We can duplicate modules in Fusion. It's frustrating that we cannot do the same with filters. Why is this feature important to you - We all know what it's like when you're working on a Scenario and then you realize you need a filter to be on the other side of a module. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to move this like a module. Instead, you have to rebuild it. And, depending upon the complexity of the filter, it can be a pain. (I'm encountering this right now.)  How would you like the feature to work - Just like you can clone a module, you should be able to copy/paste a filter.  Current Behaviour - It doesn't do that and it's extremely annoying. 

Workfront Fusion does not account for Daylight Savings Time, which is confusing when mangaging Scenarios and evaluating Cycles/Executions, especially because Workfront does account for DST.

A helpful and efficient update that would help reduce the number of fusion scenario runs and modules needed after an Adobe Workfront Watch Event (instant) would be simply to include numberOfChildren as an Event Filter option for Task events webhook configuration.   We are looking to drive automation once a task status changes but looking to limit the run on only actual tasks, not parent tasks.   We are able to work around but see double the number of runs necessary and need to add extra modules to read the task after the webhook.   This would be similar to this idea where the option to filter by that field for task objects:  Fusion Watch module for a task canStart update | Community  

Idea summary:Workfront Fusion should support non-client-secret authentication patterns for Azure DevOps integrations using Microsoft Entra ID, specifically OIDC-based federated authentication / workload identity federation.Problem:Today, the Fusion Azure DevOps Entra authentication flow depends on client secrets. In our environment, client-secret authentication is no longer permitted under enterprise security policy. Because of that, we cannot use the current Fusion connection method in a compliant way.Requested capability:Add support for secretless authentication so Fusion can obtain tokens from Microsoft Entra ID without relying on client secrets.Why this matters:- Our current integration path is blocked by security policy- This has been a long-running blocker for our Fusion to Azure DevOps use case- It affects business operations and slows our ability to expand Workfront usage- We need either native support for this auth pattern or a clearly supported alternativeDesired outcome:Supp

Small automation win I wanted to share with the community We recently set up an automated notification in Workfront that triggers the moment a proof is approved — instantly alerting both the content owner and the project owner.Sounds simple, right? But before this, those two people were either:— Waiting on manual follow-ups— Finding out late and losing time on next steps— Relying on someone to remember to ping themNow the moment a proof is approved, the right people know. No chasing, no lag.Sometimes the highest-ROI automations aren't the complex ones — they're the ones that eliminate a small, repetitive friction point that was quietly slowing everything down.Anyone else has quick wins like this? Would love to hear what small automations have made a big difference on your team. 👇

Workfront Administrators should be granted system permissions that allow them to configure, control, and govern notification behavior across the Workfront domain for their system users. This would help to ensure consistent system communication, reduce notification fatigue, and support enterprise standards for how and when users are informed of Workfront activity.

SUMMARY FOR WORKFRONT FUSION detailed Observability requirements.We are working on offloading the Workfront Fusion logs to Splunk and have explored the recently shared Workfront fusion activity log api . Below are the enhancements we are looking to get from Workfront Fusion platform._______________________________________________________________________1.Fetching Notification Logs (Execution State/Errors/history)•    Currently Fusion maintains execution logs for each scenario, and you can view these logs in the Fusion UI under the scenario’s execution history.•    Enhancement: Is there a way to fetch notification logs or see where they are stored (e.g., scenario stopped, execution errors)?________________________________________2. Enhanced Message Field for Module Actions (Create/Delete/Modify/etc.)•    Currently, Fusion logs actions such as module creation, deletion, and modification, but the log messages are not highly descriptive about the specific changes made.•    Enhancement: Is

Description - Please enable a way to us to automate the moving of regular Workfront documents (i.e. local in the Project) into an AEM Linked Folder via the API (preferably a Fusion action module).Why is this feature important to you - It's laborious and prone-to-error for users to manually drag and drop Workfront Documents into an AEM Linked Folder. We have many clients where this could be a big time-saver both in terms of reducing the effort to move files and also improving the accuracy of where they place them as we could automate that based on Document metadata.How would you like the feature to work -  Have a Workfront module in Fusion where we can map in the Document ID and also the ID of the (Linked) Folder or its associated Linked Folder ID it is to be moved into. Even if we have to use a Workfront Custom API call or plain old HTTP Request that would be fine as long as it is via a Production API.Current Behaviour - There are various internal API calls we have tried to emulat

I would like to be able to create a dashboard where I can monitor active scenarios and operations, I would like to see all at once with its stats.  Would be nice to  have a more meaningful error message, and have the msg displayed in dashboard for the corresponding scenario where error ocurred, ability to know how many times scenario has run during a range of time, know number of failures, display the running total count of operations against the total ie 50% of operactions or 400,000 of 800,000 have been executed.thank you 😊

Undo button available for system admins when designing/creating within a custom form, layout template, reporting, text mode. Please make this available when designing scenarios in Workfront Fusion as well. Why is this feature important to you - Eliminate unnecessary rework.How would you like the feature to work - Start by adding the undo button in custom forms, so if you delete a field by accident you can undo the action.Current Behavior - There is no undo button

Description -Adobe Workfront allows for setting up complex webhook trigger conditions, including "OR" comparison.  This allows for triggering webhooks for cases like "Field 1 OR Field 2 Changed". The "Watch Event" module in Fusion, however, only allows for "AND" conditions. This results in cases where we either need to (1) duplicate scenarios for each of the "OR" cases so that our admins can see the actual trigger conditions or (2) setup the complex webhook trigger using the Workfront API but lose visibility into the conditions within Fusion, meaning our admins are in the dark. Why is this feature important to you -We want to both ensure our admins have (1) clarity on each of the scenarios' setup and (2) not duplicating effort and (3) are empowered without specialty knowledge like having to use Workfront APIs via Postman/curl/etc. How would you like the feature to work -Whatever filter criteria expressions are supported by the Workfront API should be reflected

Description - Until very recently the Auto-Align button was on the main screen.  Now it is hidden under the More (...) button.Why is this feature important to you - When I'm building I use this button dozens of times per day...possibly even hundreds of times. Now with it hidden underneath the More (...) button it is doubling my mouse-clicks....very frustrating.How would you like the feature to work - Please put it back on the main screen.

UI Description:The current Fusion UI does not prompt for confirmation before deleting a scenario. Additionally, there is no visual indication of which scenario is selected for deletion, and deleted scenarios cannot be restored via the UI.Why this feature is important:Accidental deletion of scenarios can result in lost work and require significant time to rebuild. Without a confirmation prompt or a visual highlight, it’s easy to misclick and remove the wrong scenario. Since the UI offers no recovery option, this can lead to irreversible loss.How this feature would work:When a user clicks the delete icon for a scenario, a confirmation modal should appear asking, "Are you sure you want to delete this scenario?" The scenario line item should be highlighted when hovered over or selected for deletion, so the user clearly sees which scenario is being targeted. Optionally, an "Undo" notification or a soft-delete feature (trash bin or restore option) would add an extra layer of protection.Curre

The Fusion tab and filter for Active/Inactive scenarios was recently removed for Workfront Ultimate users. This filter is a key indicator for companies on whether or not their complete Fusion environment is functional. Regardless of if an org has an unlimited license, they should still be able to filter between their active/inactive Fusion scenarios and know at a glance the state of their environments.

Description - Enable a module that can call another scenario directlyWhy is this feature important to you - This would enable a more modular design of our workflow by having common functionality in one scenario that can be called by other scenarios without having to duplicate the functionality across all of the scenarios.How would you like the feature to work - A simple module that provides the input of the scenario name to call and the inputs to pass.Current Behaviour - Have to code custom webhooks to call scenarios

Description - While using the HTTP Fusion module with the Basic Auth feature, the system creates a key (in the Keys section) for the credentials added. There is no option to update an existing key which was created in a case where the credentials were changed. We use many such connections to our internal services where the credentials are rotated periodically and to update them in Fusion, someone needs to find the usage of the credentials in the whole list of scenarios and update them manually after creating a new key.Why is this feature important to you - It takes a lot of manual effort to find and update every scenario, even with the use of the connection switch tool within the Fusion dev tools where a person needs to look through all the scenarios and update the HTTP modules.How would you like the feature to work - It would be nice to have an option to update an existing key from the Keys section where the users cannot see the existing credentials but are able to provide and save ne

There is no easy way to know if someone has deleted a scenario and who deleted the scenario ...or a way to restore it back. There is also no easy way to run a report or even copy/paste the scenario names into a spreadsheet to try and compare against.  This is an urgent need, because someone could really mess things up the way the product works currently.

Description - We do have multiple admins in our Fusion team, who all get an email notification if a scenario fails. So far so good.It would be nice if you could temporarily pause these notifications for a specific scenario so as not to alert colleagues if an error occurs during modifying and testing the scenario.Why is this feature important to you - To be able to modify an active scenario without alerting team admins in case of an error.How would you like the feature to work - It would help to have a "Pause notifications" button, which stays active for an amount of time, or just a manual switch.Current Behaviour - Any admin gets notified, what leads to confusion, if not communicated, that someone is working on the scenario.

Description - At the moment there is not simple action when we want to update access rules on an object, and it would be great to have this featureWhy is this feature important to you - At the moment there is no way to simple update access rules on Project/Issue/Task if neededHow would you like the feature to work - There is a new module or extension within custom actions where we can update access rules (add/remove/modify)Current Behaviour - We have to manually copy access rules, create new ones manually, and assign the full array to the object

Description - It would be great if we can have a similar functionality that is available in Workfront where we can promote environments, for example if we want to test scenarios in the demo env and then move those scenarios to production teamWhy is this feature important to you - It would shorten the development time, allowing us to focus on important implementation topics and not migrationHow would you like the feature to work - Button available in teams not marked as production from which we can push scenarios/folders while defining connection from the production team that should be used for depending modulesCurrent Behaviour - Feature not available

Description - a module that allows me to write custom ECMA script   Why is this feature important to you - for data conversion, often the Fusion tools are less than ideal and require many tools/regex/JSON modules to accomplish things. Especially annoying is the inability to set attributes on an object.   How would you like the feature to work - Would love a module that has an input field that takes N arguments, which can be selected from the popup panel text box that implicitly creates a function wrapper, with he selected arguments as inputs expects a return statement and the returned value is accessible in the flow as "output" similar to Switch module Bonus: ability to make this a named module, so it can be used in multiple places with just the inputs changing    

Add the ability to get a Fusion Test Drive account. There is already the ability to request a Workfront Test Drive account, so this would go hand-in-hand with that.

 Description - As a Fusion Developer, I would like to have the ability to search, sort, and filter the Fusion datastore view.Why is this feature important to you - It's very tedious to find records by visually looking at the datastore. It's also difficult to organize the Fusion datastores without the ability to sort the columns.How would you like the feature to work - I would like the ability to sort by ascending or descending order, filter each column and search the datastore for specific records.Current Behavior - The Fusion datastore is not sortable, filterable, or searchable. The only way to find a record is to manually search each page individually or to use Fusion to search.

Description - Fix how the "favorites" bar works Why is this feature important to you - It's bad UX and after 6 of those apps the menu gets truncated.  it's not really favorites since it keeps any app that has a module placed in the canvas How would you like the feature to work - If it's "all apps used in this scenario" Don't name it "favorites" If it's "favorites" Don't remove apps when not used in a scenario Same faves across all scenarios (ie, user-based) In either case App bar should be scrollable The + (add) should be always visible (currently it moves outside the viewport) The popup menu of the app's modules should be placed so the right edge is within the viewport   Current Behaviour - one icon per each app in scenario (whether connected or orphan) not "favorites" but specific to scenario re-generated when going into edit mode (apps that are not used in the scenario get removed) length of favorites bar grows with window width as apps fill bar the popup m