Adobe Workfront Fusion

Hi, I am trying to solve a case where I have a multidrop down field for different Assignees (assigned to different Teams). My current issue is, if there is a multiselect it overwrites the Assigned team with the last option in the Router list instead of adding all the assignees when there is multi-select.Example:1. Someone selects Option Easter Egg - Team Green should get assigned to the issue2. If someone selects Option Christmas - Team Red should get assigned to the issue3. But if someone selects Option Easter Egg and Christmas - Team Green and Team Red should get assigned to the issue. Currently only Team Christmas gets assigned if both Options are selected since it overwrites the previous assignment. What can I do to add more assignees instead of replacing them with the latest assignee? Thanks

Hi All, I'm trying to change the issue share permission to only view for all users including inherited permission but I'm getting error But getting The operation failed with an error. [422] unrecognized URI format: too many parts errorBut getting  Any Idea ? Thanks in Advance.   

I am running a scenario that is trying to copy a parent task (and it's children) from a Template to a Project. I do not want to copy over all of the tasks from the Template, only specific parent tasks (+ children) based on info on the custom form.Which module/action is best for this?

Has anyone been able to read cross project predecessor information in Fusion?  We are trying to read the predecessor projected completion date to then reset the planned start date on the second project to have accurate capacity planning.  Project A - Task 3 need to be completed  for Project B Task 1 to start. I'm not seeing where I can pull predecessor from a different project.  Only the predecessor information from that same project.  

Hi All, I trying to workout a fusion scenario that once a user is assigned to an issue, they are immediately assigned to the first stage of the approval process for the issue.  All assistance is greatly appreciated.

I have a scenario where I am automatically approving an issue and updating its status to Approved. After the approval, I attempt to convert the issue into a project using the Misc Action module. While doing this, I select the Preserve Issue option so that the original issue remains and is linked as the resolvable object for the newly created project.However, once the conversion happens, the issue’s status changes to New because the project begins in the Planning status. My intent is to retain the issue’s status as Approved, even though the project itself starts in Planning.Is it possible to maintain the issue’s status as Approved in this scenario?

This is one of my favorite scenarios to date and it is very simple to create yourself. I always hated looking up the system status codes and also love having all my fusion data in one spot. This scenario gets all statuses and puts them into a report that is then added to a dashboard. I have multiple reports that are related to any and all WF IDs including this.Outcome: 

I'm trying to set some field values at project template,but they are not being reflected at fusion converted project.I used the misc module for conversion and used preserveIsuue.

Hi All, Is there way to get the system audit log details in fusion Foe example if user access changes from "x" to "y" by "System". How we can trigger or search in workfront fusion. Thanks in Advance!

I wrote a nifty scenario, sorry I'm fairly new to Fusion and this one I'm very proud of lol, that monitors a OneDrive folder for new files and then imports the issues listed in the CSV file.   The problem is I can't make the issue show the actual requested by as any one but Fusion.  The only field I seem to be able to change is the submitted by.  Even though I update the Entered By date with a column from the CSV displaying who I want to be the requester, it changes it to Fusion every time.  Has anyone found a way around this?  We need the requester to show as the actual person in the overview section.  Thanks in advance for any ideas.

Hi All, What are the best practices to store static data(10-15 Custom TaskId's in JSON format ) in Fusion to use it in scenario for filtering purposes in JSONata module ? Changes to JSON data will happen if there is a need to add/delete TaskID when required( again not so frequently). Is it better to store this data in Setvariables or datastore or data structure ? Appreciate for any feedback/recommendations. Thanks.

Hey Fusion Community, I'm helping a customer migrate data (projects and tasks) from their soon-to-be previous project management system to Workfront. We'll be exporting files from their old PM system and I'll need to import them to Workfront, but I need to be sure said files are associated with the correct projects and tasks that are imported as well.Anyone have suggestions on how I might accomplish this in Fusion?  I'm good with importing projects and tasks, it's the part about importing files and associating with the correct projects and tasks. Thanks!Nick

If start date and end date has to be changed in 30projects suggest a fusion scenario to built.

I am attempting to trigger a scenario when a file is uploaded on to certain tasks on a project. I thought using the Template Task ID to narrow down my trigger would help but I don't seem to trigger anything when uploading. I also tried adding the PortfolioID to narrow down my trigger but that also seems to cause the scenario to miss my file uploads.  Any off in my webhook here? The file I am uploading is on the Task level, FYI. 

Hi WF Fusion Community, Does anyone have a recommended approach for the most efficient way to import new tasks that have predecessors? Also, if the external project management systems I'm exporting projects and tasks from doesn't assign a number for task order, does this kind of screw me over for attempting to ensure tasks are in the correct order when imported to Workfront? Thanks!Nick

We've been dealing with a LOT of brain-breaking issues lately. I won't rehearse them all here, but they're all basically caused by the SharePoint integration for Workfront. Just seeing the word "SharePoint" makes me want to curse. Unrelated to SharePoint, an IT engineer friend of mine shared "No as a service," which is hysterically funny to me. I love an API which only exists to provide funny and lame excuses as to why something cannot be done. It's so pointless but in the best way possible. I wanted to figure out a use for this silly thing. I needed a mental break to do something Fusion related which had nothing to do with our SharePoint misery. So, I made my first Fusion-based easter egg.  In our help queue, if you add the phrase "no-as-a-service" in one of the fields, Fusion will bypass our usual support ticket routing and give you a lame excuse. It's a simple little thing; this is what it looks like: It's pretty simple; it's just making a GET call to h

I have a scenario that converts an issue to a project and leaves an update for a developer, the update shows up in their email but not on the project. When I go back and look at the scenario history the whole scenario ran just fine with no errors. Has anybody encountered this before? Do you have any ideas as to what is happening? Normally for these kinds of errors I would just add a sleep module to account for processing time but this scenario has been running just fine for the past 9 months and I have never seen this error.

I briefly mentioned this in another comment but wanted to ask the question here. Last year, we talked with Adobe's training folks about developing a curriculum for an advanced Fusion training. This would not be a training which would happen right after the initial Fusion bootcamp. Rather, this would be a course one would take after a few months of using the tool. Obviously, you cannot cover everything within one bootcamp. Heck, you can't do it with two. But there are many things which most Fusion users don't know that they don't know until they're trying to build something...and they just can't figure it out (without having to engage Adobe consulting). I can think of a few things off the top of my head right now--advanced use of the HTTP module, work with arrays, custom webhooks--which would be useful for users to receive instruction.Also...we need more instructional materials on Experience League (which is a separate issue). Is this something which is being wo

We want to have fusion create a task and perform an advanced hours allocation to multiple roles (i.e. 10 hours for writer, 20 hours for designer, 30 hours for editor). Is this possible? 

I need to track and record any changes on a custom form with 341 fields... Is there a good way to accomplish this, is this even possible? 

I have a Fusion Scenario where the 1st module I invoke a HTTP Rest API. The API has a property named "status" - that can take either of the 2 values below1. Processing2. Complete I would like my scenario process further *only if* the status is complete. If the status is in processing state - The scenario should wait and retry after 60 seconds. Can anyone suggest me the ways to achieve this ?ThanksHarish

Hello Friends, Within the Adobe Fusion Dashboard, under Team Overview I am presented with two charts on the top of the page. The first is 'Team Operations for the Last Year' and the second is 'Top Scenarios by Operations'. When viewing this sceond chart, the bottom axis displays the Scenario's ID Number and when I hover my cursor over each bar, a tooltip pops-up, showing me the same ID Number... Is this the default behavior of this chart? I ask, because it would be a much better user experience if that chart was able to display the Scenario's Name, so I could quickly identify it. I have 26 active scenarios and unfortunately, I have not  committed all 26 of the scenario ID Numbers to memory. Is anyone else annoyed by this UX? Wes- 

I'm looking for Fusion best practices for setting up organizations where multiple groups will utilizing the system in tandem for their group processes. Examples on:How to set up TeamsWhat access levels to giveOnce teams and access levels are setup, how to control that users are only using the "service" accounts and not establishing personal connections to platforms.

Hi all, working on making a connection between Workfront Core (Sandbox instance) and Workfront Proof. I'm trying to set up the connection module in Fusion, but I'm consistently getting a Request Timeout error when I attempt to authenticate.I've double-checked the credentials and endpoints, and everything seems to be configured correctly from my end. I've attached a screenshot for reference in case it helps identify the issue.Has anyone run into this before or can point me in the right direction? Not finding much in the community on this exact error. Appreciate any help!I followed this documentation to make the connection:👉 https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront-fusion/using/references/apps-and-their-modules/adobe-connectors/workfront-proof-modules 

Hello,I am trying to run an API call to get an issue's CurrentApprovalStep:Name.I have been unsuccessful and was wondering if anyone has accomplished this in the past. Thank you in advance