Adobe Experience Manager

I’m trying to do a redirect based on the email domain that they submitted, basically want to redirect them to page A if their non-customer domains, page B if their customer domains. As i know currenly there is no native functionality to cross check the domain to marketo lists correct? Or is there an alternative for this

When we design adaptive forms with 3 or 4 columns, we noticed they tend to overlap when we switch to mobile renditions, i was under impression in the layout mode, i can arrange them, so they stack up one over the other but i noticed it stays the same after reverting to desktop rendition. Am i missing anything ? Eventually we will be delivering this form in headless but layout is something thats under AEM scope.

hi,I am trying to create an adaptive form using form template (xdp) (foundation components) on aem 6.5.The issue is after creating adaptive form using xdp, the data source is not populating  Even though an XDP is referenced in this form, it shows blank and the error.log as following errors:19.03.2026 13:56:52.576 *ERROR* [10.238.22.152 [1773924978316] GET /content/forms/af/FOFO/adaptive-forms/A123-abc/jcr:content/guideContainer.xfajson HTTP/1.1] com.adobe.aemds.guide.xfa.XFAJSONTransformer Error in transforming xfa json:nulljava.lang.NullPointerException: null19.03.2026 13:56:52.577 *ERROR* [10.238.22.152 [1773924978316] GET /content/forms/af/FOFO/adaptive-forms/A123-abc/jcr:content/guideContainer.xfajson HTTP/1.1] com.adobe.aemds.guide.service.impl.GuideModelImporterImpl Error in importing Xfa Jsoncom.adobe.aemds.guide.service.GuideException: null at com.adobe.aemds.guide.xfa.XFAJSONTransformer.transform(XFAJSONTransformer.java:104) [com.adobe.aemds.guide.aemds-guide-core:6.0.688] at

Hi Team,We are observing a very high volume of requests hitting AEM internal Granite APIs:/libs/granite/csrf/token.json (~618K requests, ~19%) /libs/granite/security/currentuser.json (~300K requests, ~9.3%)Together, these endpoints account for nearly 29% of total traffic in our logs.We understand these endpoints are used for authentication/session handling, but this volume seems unusually high and is impacting overall traffic patterns.We would like guidance on:Is this level of traffic expected for these endpoints in Adobe Experience Manager (especially Cloud Service)? What are the recommended best practices to reduce or optimize calls to these APIs?      Dispatcher/CDN rules? Frontend implementation improvements? Could this indicate a misconfiguration (e.g., frequent polling, missing caching, or bot traffic)? Are there Adobe-recommended patterns to minimize repeated CSRF token and current user calls? Any insights or similar experiences would be really helpful. Thanks in advance!

I wanted to understand whether this is advisable for PII data to be stored within AEM, and what the recommended best practices are.Some of the questions we’re exploring:Is it recommended to store PII in AEMaaCS, even in encrypted form? How does Adobe protect sensitive data at rest and in transit within AEMaaCS? Are there any Adobe guidelines on handling PII in JCR repositories? How is it protected from any external attack threats? Can we implement custom encryption (e.g., using an OSGi service) before storing data? Are there recommended alternatives, such as storing the PII in a secured backend system instead of AEM?Would appreciate insights from Adobe experts and the community on the right architectural approach for handling PII securely in AEMaaCS.

Environment : AEM 6.5.21 , Issue do not see the persistent queries. endpoint can be seen on right side, but no persistent queries loaded, even though queries exist at crxde jcr node settings level for this specific project. This issue is on my local aem instance. configuration browser selected all the checkboxes, /content/site/jcr:content pointed to /conf/site where settings folder exist having all persistent queries  

ADOBE MAKES ASKING QUESTIONS TOO DARN HARD.I have been struggling for an hour to understand my problem and THAT IS RIDICULOUS. I made a virtual copy of an image in LR and then chose “edit a copy in PS with lightroom adjustments”. When I sent the image back to LRc, there was no copy made and the new image overwrote the .TIF file original. My original (with Google AI adjustments that cannot be replicated ‘cuz I’m out of usage tokens) is ** COMPLETELY GONE **. I am quite beyond irritated. Yes, I still have the pre-Google raw file, but I am very much not happy. What should I have done?

Hi Community,I’m looking for suggestions and best practices around importing Salsify product data into AEM, specifically for creating or updating Content Fragments.Current ArchitectureSalsify product data is exported and stored in AEM DAM as .txt files. AEM Workflow is triggered on these DAM assets The workflow: Reads the Salsify JSON Creates Product Pages Sets product properties on the pages based on the JSON This approach is currently page‑centric, driven by workflow logicNew / Evolving RequirementWe are exploring a shift to:Content Fragments as the primary product data source Importing product data via: CSV files where one or more columns contain Salsify JSON, or Directly from JSON assets Mapping Salsify attributes to Content Fragment Models Supporting re‑imports / updates (idempotent behavior)What I’m Looking ForI’d appreciate guidance on:Recommended patterns for CSV/JSON → Content Fragment creation Whether workflows are still the preferred approach, or if: Custom servlets Sc

Three quick questions for AEM teams. Answer whichever applies to you: 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝟏: AEM Cloud MigrationIf you had to migrate to Cloud Service tomorrow, how ready would you be?🟢 Ready — fully assessed🟡 Mostly ready — some unknowns🟠 Haven't fully assessed🔴 Not ready — significant technical debt 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝟐: Edge Delivery ServicesWhat's your EDS strategy?📋 Already using EDS or Adobe's new Modernization Agent🔍 Evaluating it❓ Haven't started thinking about it🤷 Not sure what EDS is (no judgment — it's new) 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝟑: AccessibilityHow confident are you in your AEM site's WCAG/EAA compliance?✅ Fully compliant and tested🔶 Mostly compliant with known gaps⚠️ Haven't done a proper audit🚫 Not on our radar yet Drop your answers in the comments. I'm genuinely curious where the community stands. I'll share the results with my analysis next week. (And yes, I've worked with teams in all four categories on all three questions. No judgment here.) #AEM #AdobeExperienceMana

Hi,I have come across a problem, where the checkbox which is on Static tagged PDF, is not read correctly by screen readers such as voice over.It reads the title, but not if the checkbox is checked /unchecked. The static PDF which is tagged, as cross mark on the check box, but voice over is not able to recognize it and read it aloud. hence it reads only the title of the checkbox. Please note: The static pdf is rendered using outputservice.generatePDF API and is tagged. NVDA screen reader, is reading check box  unavailable  checked  read only, after the title is read aloud. But Voice over and acrobat pro read aloud is not able to recognize this.Anyone seen this issue before.?

Get certified at Summit - we are ready with expanded testing capacity! Full passholders attending Adobe Summit 2026 can get certified for free by passing an on-site certification exam. All exams (except Adobe ColdFusion and Adobe Captivate) will be available. You may take as many different exams as you like, but you may not take the same exam more than once.  Testing hours are April 19-21 @ 9am-5pm PT and April 22 @ 8am-1pm PT. Seating is first-come, first-served. Find us at the Adobe Certification table on the 5th floor of the Venetian.  You must bring your own fully-charged laptop to take advantage of this offer. Free stable and secure Wi-Fi will be provided.  Learn more today! 

👉 Calling all AEM practitioners in the San Francisco Bay Area and beyond ‼️👋We're thrilled to announce the launch of the AEM User Group - Bay Area chapter! Hosted by seasoned AEM experts KrishnaKalyan Gorthi and Mrinal Kumar, this is a community dedicated to passionate AEM users who come together to share best practices, collectively problem solve, and network.This chapter will host in-person and virtual meetings, so there is no shortage of ways to connect with your peers. 🙌Sign up here: https://aem-augs.adobe.com/aemug-bay-area/

We are using the WCM Core component PDF Viewer (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-core-components/using/wcm-components/pdf-viewer) on our site to improve the pdf experience of our customers but we are getting analytics cookies coming along for the ride:acrobatservices.adobe.comdc-api.adobe.iop.typekit.netp13n.adobe.iouse.typekit.netviewlicense.adobe.ioObviously we need to make sure if the users disables analytic cookies in our cookie consent manager that these cookies don’t get dropped.This isn’t a problem for js that we managed in Adobe Tags, we have rules to wire it up to the consent manager but im not sure how to go about wiring up these cookies from this core component.Any ideas?

1. DescriptionWhen an AEM author uses the "Convert to Experience Fragment Variation" action from the page editor, the OOTB servlet ConvertToExperienceFragmentVariation (from bundle com.adobe.cq.cq-experience-fragments) hardcodes the sling:resourceType on the converted component node to:cq/experience-fragments/editor/components/experiencefragment This prevents us from using our custom brand-specific Experience Fragment component during and after conversion. There is currently no extension point, OSGi hook, or request parameter to override this value. . Steps to ReproduceOpen any AEM page in the page editor. Right-click a component (e.g. Hero component). Select "Convert to Experience Fragment Variation". Fill in the conversion dialog and click Submit. Observe the POST request sent to:            /libs/cq/experience-fragments/content/v2/conversion/converterOpen CRXDE Lite and inspect the converted component node. Observe that sling:resourceType is hardcoded to the OOTB value. Expected vs.

Are there recommendations/best practices to manage content as code.One of the team I work with mentioned this as their problem statement “Our code gets deployed through Cloud Manager but our QA cannot test anything yet nor can automated regression tests be triggered through Continuous Test Pipelines because they have to wait until content is authored.”The human element in the process feels like a huge bottle neck in the process as it is hindering immediate feedback loop.I am trying to understand what strategies other enterprises who use AEM have implemented in their SDLC process.For example in a sprint, if the code and content are planned to be delivered together, cant the content creators(BA/Business) be ready with the content that go in with the fragments that get deployed as part of code 

Dear AEM Community,Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with AEM.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for March 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for AEM. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any AEM-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – empowering you to provide a truly personalized experience to your customers with AEM.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Articles!Take a look:W

Check out the list of AEM User Group meetings happening in April:🌷 [VIRTUAL] April 15 @ 12pm ET: "Adobe Summit Prep 2026: Know Before You Go" with AEM - Midwest Chapter🌷 [VIRTUAL] April 28 @ 10am ET: "Adobe Summit 2026 Recap – focused on AEM Assets" with the AEM - Global DAM Chapter🌷 [VIRTUAL] April 30 @ 2pm IST: "AEM APAC Office Hours: Adobe Summit 2026 Recap" with AEM Champion Office Hours👉 See you there!: https://aem-augs.adobe.com/events/#/list

Adobe's MCP servers are great. But what if you could build AI tools designed exactly for your business or development use-case?In my latest article, I show how to custom-build MCP integrations in TypeScript so AI tools like Claude or Cursor can:🗂️ Find and act on expiring DAM assets in plain language⚡ Bulk update metadata without juggling the UI🔍 Query logs with natural prompts like “show errors from the last 4 hours”🔗 Chain multiple operations in one smart prompt And the best part? It works for on-prem, AMS, and AEMaaCS setups - all tailored to your deployment, letting AI do the heavy lifting while keeping you in control 🎯 Check the article here: https://medium.com/@vorajineet/aem-mcp-your-way-design-business-specific-ai-tools-for-any-aem-deployment-ff66c3fde22dLink to Github: https://github.com/vorajineet/aem-mcp-server

Adobe photoshop is failing and wont reinstall

trying to execute "aio login" and result is:Visit this url to log in: https://aio-login.adobeioruntime.net/api/v1/web/default/applogin?id=********&port=*****&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Faio-login.adobeioruntime.net%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fweb%2Fdefault%2Fapplogin%2Flogin-success - Waiting for browser loginnode:events:497 throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event ^ Error: spawn undefined\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell ENOENT at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:285:19) at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:483:16) at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) Emitted 'error' event on ChildProcess instance at: at ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:291:12) at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:483:16) at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) { errno: -4058, code: 'ENOENT', syscall: 'spawn undefined\\System32\\WindowsPower