Adobe Analytics

It would be very useful to be able to build a segment based on JavaScript enabled or not.  Currently, there is a way to segment Java, but not JavaScript.  For the sake of SiteCatalyst and reporting metrics, it seems like JavaScript would be more useful to SiteCatalyst than Java.  If JavaScript is disbled then you have to rely on the noscript tag. 

When breaking down the row of a table in Discover 3 the item in first column is repeated against every line in the breakdown.To illustrate- imagine we wanted to breakdown column A (country) by pages- Column A                | Column B    | Column C  Country                    |                       |Page viewsUnited States         |Page A          | xxxxUnited States         |Page B          | xxxxUnited States         |Page C          | xxxxUnited States         |Page D          | xxxx The value in column A (in this case the US) is repeated against every value in column B & C This creates a significant amount of unnecessarily work when this data is exported, since the output must be ‘cleaned’ in order for it to be made presentable. This also strongly limits the usefulness of scheduled reports. In previous versions of Discover breakdowns were displayed much more clearly. If a row was broken down the smaller values appeared directly under the aggregated value. I strongly believe th

Adding a "disable" checkbox to each Tag Manager module would be a nice touch.

I would like to be able to create a group and give that group access to the tag manager even if they are not admins.

Currently if you are using a secondary server calls across multiple sites and want to gain a de-duped number in a global report suite we need to deploy primary and secondary calls using a single third party cookie. It's becoming increasingly common for third party cookies to get blocked by some browsers and mobile devices.  To combat this problem it would be useful if we could have a blended approach e.g the primary server call uses first party cookies, then secondary server call uses third party cookies. We could take this one step further and on the back end processessing consolidate cookies where possible to preference the first party cookie.  Alternatively Adobe should also consider purchasing or developing a finger printing approach to unique user identification to help combat this issue.

Essentially, copy this google analytics feature: http://techcrunch.com/2012/06/04/google-analytics-now-lets-you-conduct-browser-size-analysis/

I wish we were able to display multiple dimensions in a single report in Site Catalyst. This would make it much easier to get a more comprehensive view of the data. In addition, having the ability to filter by each dimension (see screenshot below), we could eliminate the need to build and manage so many segments. We can sort of get to this in Data Warehouse, but it’s not as quick and flexible as Site Catalyst . In the example below, we could filter data without creating a single segment. This would be much quicker and prevent massive clutter in the segment menu. 

As an admin, I would like to change the menu structure how I want. For an example, when we have some reports enabled like, path reports, we can't change the names of  the reports inside the menu of the path report (like Site Sections). That's because we translate and re-organize all reports for an easier understanding. So, for campaigns too. If I don't use the campaigns and creative elements for campaign tracking, I would like to see just the tracking code report.Even if I delete the creative elements and campaign tracking on "Conversion -> Conversion Classifications", this two reports remains visible.

Build a dashboard and include any trended reportlet. When you push/publish/share it across suites you would think it retains either the default "Top 5" or keeps the "User selected" entries depending on what you built.It doesn't. If you used the default top 5, it will convert the reportlet to "User selected" and carry those specific values to any new report suite. Why does it matter? Say you have 30+ suites and you want to trend the top 5 channels in a reportlet for several markets. In Miami the top channels are A, B, C, D, E. In Fresno they happen to be L,M,N,O,P. Your reportlet will happily show Fresno the trend of A-E and completely ignore the top 5 channels in the market. In some cases, I would like to select static values and have them persist, but the "top 5" setting needs to be set to the top 5 in each given report suite. This is related to Search-in-Trended-Reportlets-for-Dashboards but is further reaching. 

Hello,Although I understand the thoughts behind moving many of the user guides to be online only - we have a situation where it is necessary to share this info across departments, but we don't want to set up a dozen logins just so people can view the help/user guide. Could you PLEASE create a PDF option that can be downloaded? Two examples I'm thinking of are for Report Builder and Tag Manager - there is no PDF, or easy way to download a version of these guides that can be printed.

I submitted the concern to ClientCare that we are seeing different results in the Data Warehouse monthly page view report from what we see in the SiteCatalyst report.  The response was ..."In rare cases, Data Warehouse may report a higher number of site-wide (i.e., non-segmented) page views than SiteCatalyst reports for the same date range and report suite. These cases may occur where no page name or page URL data is passed in a certain number of page view image requests from your site, but where conversion data (eVar values, custom events, etc.) is passed. In these cases, SiteCatalyst excludes the page view associated with such a hit due to a lack of critical information (while still processing the conversion data). Data Warehouse, however, will report the page view regardless of the missing page name and page URL data." We would like to see Adobe address this discrepency!kedwards

I'd like to be able to copy the structure of a SAINT table from one eVar to another.We store something like a Campaign variable in 3 separate eVars. I had to rebuild the SAINT definition table twice. Would be nice to be able to say "Copy definitions from..." in the Admin tool.

To get time spent on an s.prop I have to go to client care and enable pathing. My idea is to have either time spent enabled on all s.props or enabled pathing on all s.props by default.

In 13.5 the Time Spent Per Visit report listed the average time spent in the total in addition to broken out by the various time buckets. This disappeared in 14. Currently the only way to get this is via the ExcelClient

It would be real nice to segment traffic coming from emails -- currently on referrer types there are "Other websites," "Search Engines", "Social Networks" -- but nothing from email. It would be great to be able to track revenue, visits, etc. from email without adding tags. 

Currently it is only possible to rename list variables through the Customize Menu function.  It would be nice to have an admin console screen under Admin > Report Suites where List Variables can be renamed and any other settings available to list vars can be adjusted.

Please add functionality to D3 that would allow you to search for the name of Project.Please add functionality to D3 that would allow you to display the record of  "recent used project". Cheers

In order to determine the effectiveness and use of a given custom report within SiteCatalyst, I'd like to see the ability to track how often custom reports have been viewed by approved users.

I get a lot of reports in my custom report list and I would like to delete or rename the report I don't use anymore. Client Care told me it was impossible. I'm sure it would be a quick win for everyone if these options would be implemented in SiteCatalyst. 

Whilst the alerts function is very helpful for setting absolute trigger values, it seems to be impossible to set an alert to trigger in when a value changes by a -ve %. For example, I want to trigger an alert when my unique visitors decreases by 25%.Even if I set the alert to -25% it still triggers whenever the 25% threshold is breached (either +ve or -ve) If Adobe could add that ad It's a simple change, but would really uplevel the effectiveness of this function.

The new calendaring options in Discover 3.0 are pretty amazing, but there is one outstanding request we have because the capability to do this exists in SiteCatalyst.  We would like for it to be possible to set a fixed start date on a Discover project date range, but have the end date be a rolling date.  Currently is seems only possible to do both dates as fixed or both dates as rolling.

Can the display of referrer be removed limit of 255 bytes in referrer report?

In case of closing users profile, we need to keep on an other user profile some scheduling request on DataWarehouse and some scheduling report on Discover.So we want to transfer easily a scheduling from one owner to an other.I think it's already possible for scheduling report on Site Catalyst. Thanks, Nicolas Butez - Voyages-SNCF.com

The SAINT admin UI displays a handy little notification that a particular report has data that hasn't propagated to all servers yet - see screenshot It would very helpful to have that same status message appear in the actual reports the data is being classified for. This way I don't have to reassure users that indeed I uploaded their data and it's not my fault that the data is not there yet ;-)

Hi,I would like to choose a date range of 90 days in Data Warehouse. There's only the possibility of 30 days, 4 weeks or one month, but we need frequently the data of the last 90 days.