Yes, although it is non-trivial and something you should work with Adobe Consulting or a specialized partner on. It would be better to pass this policy data in the SAML assertion mapped to group/role names in AEM. If you use encapsulated tokens, you do not need sticky connections.

Hi,Encapsulated token-based authentication and support for multiple SAML IDPs are available for AEM 6.0 as feature packs. Please get in touch with Daycare. You will need to persist some user data and ensure that this user data is available on on publish instances.Regards,Justin

In addition to what Joerg writes, it is worth pointing out that replication of application code should not be allowed if you have followed the Security Checklist. In a production system, the only content which should be replicatable (meaning that the replication receiver user has write access to) is...

In Javascript, you can do something like this to get the username:CQ_Analytics.ClientContext.get("profile/authorizableId")Regards,Justin

Hi,Why do you need the ClassLoader? I would suggest just calling MBeanServer.invoke().Regards,Justin

Hi,I think you can do this (sorry, never tried it directly) using an event handler for the loadcontent event on the dialog.Regards,Justin

Hi,I'm not sure why you need a scheduler for this when ACS AEM Commons includes a way to handle through requests, but...Yes, if you are hosting multiple sites in AEM, you will likely need to add support for generating multiple sitemaps to your component. One way to do this is by using OSGi factory c...

CQ 5.3 has been EOL since September 2013: http://www.adobe.com/support/products/enterprise/eol/eol_matrix.html

@orotas - that's what I meant by "ugly" Generating JS (or CSS or JSON) with Sightly is possible, but because it uses HTML constructs, it looks weird. Although arguably the same thing could be said about JSP or ESP.

Correction - I take it back. Sightly can be used to generate JS. It's just a bit ugly because you still need to use HTML tags and you must be sure to use data-sly-unwrap. Sorry for the misinformation. The script name would look like controller.js.html (vs. controller.js.jsp).