Props for the detailed explanation.I will try to answer the questions. But first I have to advise you to start thinking about code and content when working with AEM. Since both reside in the same repository, it can get confusing.1. The project structure looks good. If it works in the demo author, th...

Not an answer. That documentation seems to contradict Jackrabbit's definition of update import mode.http://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/importmode.htmlImportMode.REPLACEThis is the normal behaviour. Existing content is replaced completely by the imported content, i.e. is overridden or deleted acc...

Try this in a helloworld. I would imagine that filter uses something like this to verify the referrer hosts.Pattern.compile(your regex).matcher("your referer url - only http(s)://host:port").matches()

Rohit Nalla wrote... abhishekb wrote... That error suggests you didn't add http|https to the URL. Try accessing the token url directly from the browser and check if you see the token.     If I access the token url directly(local instance publish - http://localhost:4503/libs/granite/csrf/toke...

smacdonald2008 wrote... try writing a custom AEM Servlet that retrieves the data and then return the data as a GET request.   If you're saying custom servlet for fetching the token, that will duplicating AEM's OOTB servlet. If you're saying GET request for the search query instead of POST (which mak...

That error suggests you didn't add http|https to the URL. Try accessing the token url directly from the browser and check if you see the token.

I use this query regularly to get this information in json format. It works great at all path levels.http://localhost:8051/bin/querybuilder.json?type=dam:Asset&path=/content/dam&p.limit=-1

I think an Osgi configuration factory is what you are likely looking for. Here is a good reference on how to create those https://cqdump.wordpress.com/2014/08/05/managing-multiple-instances-of-services-osgi-service-factories/And you should not give authors access to your Felix console. Admins should...

Because that's the standard where same attribute shouldn't come under two different attribute names. If your SAML provider is not following the standard, you shouldn't expect AEM or any other product to handle that.If you want to make a user admin along with SAML SSO, I will suggest to create a cust...

kk krish wrote... Yes, Default group assignation is ok. But overriding the existing user assigned groups is a little weird. Any how i have one more curious question that how can we configure more than one Group Membership names in AEM, if my SAML assertion is capable sending multiple parameter names...