From the documentation - Adobe IMS (Identity Management System) limits certain scopes (like email, profile) to specific flows. Adding unsupported scopes during authorization results in the invalid_scope error. The OAuth Web flow often returns minimal user information (sub, the unique user ID). Howe...

Yes, Adobe Analytics can support a flow similar to what you're describing through its OAuth 2.0 Server-to-Server authentication and JWT-based integration although JWT is getting deprecated starting next year. Upon successful onboarding and token exchange, Adobe issues Access Tokens that allow access...

Hey @CamdenDe ,I am assuming your system in question does not have a built-in Adobe Analytics connector in place? Does it allow custom API integrations? If so, you can create a project in Adobe Developer console and link the system using OAuth Server to Server authentication. Is this what you are tr...

Per my understanding - disabled Rules/Data Elements/Extensions are never included in libraries hence have zero impact on page performance. However, deleting unnecessary elements is always preferable to simplify managing stuff around Adobe Launch. Best,Isha 

Hi @Naveen_KumarPr ,In addition to what @FarazHusain has mentioned, you can use a uniform tracking code structure that aligns with current and future requirements. You can dedicate one field value for each of the campaign type, ID etc. You can also pass some string in tracking code to capture the cl...

Ok, so I tried and I think, the voucher will be automatically applied on the qualifying exams. You will not be asked to pay. Learnt the hard way as I ended up scheduling an exam within next hour. Cancelling would have resulted in forfeiting the voucher. Ended up taking the exam.

Hey @SrividyaVenkat , If you apply your voucher here in discount code section, is it not working?  

No harm in trying, I guess

Hmm...makes sense. I think only someone from Adobe Engineering team can confirm the actual reason! But it's fun sleuthing

Interestingly that's probably because for table 1, the Total Time Spent (in seconds) value seems to have been divided by 1 whereas, for table 2, all values seems to have been divided by 4.7..Now it could be 4.7 weeks in average per month? e.g. =305/4.7 = 65