Hi William Sorry, we don't use anything like you are asking about, but... Apologies if it's off topic perhaps, but I think there is a need for Workfront to provide "display labels" functionality which allow us to separate the label for a field displayed to the users on a particular screen, from the ...

And for those less fortunate than Vic, who don't have a tame developer at hand, there is always Fusion, which provides code-free API functionality which we are starting to create significant value with in similar areas such as renaming projects based on data entered on custom forms... Regards Bob

To get round the limitations of the WF Risks functionality, we have been using Issues to simulate Risks as it allows Custom forms, calculated fields etc. This is now becoming limiting and preventing other uses of the Issues functionality - so can we please get Risks to have the same capabilities as ...

We are interested in this and are doing some work ourselves, but I'll leave it to Jonny to provide more detail when he is back from leave. I also understand that Workfront's future "Analytics" capability will analyse the system audit logs to provide a similar functionality. At UK LEAP they were sayi...

Yep I agree this should be deployed across the API and UI. It's common practice in most databases to separate the Display Name from the Database Name for the field - even Workfront allows this type of functionality in the reporting side where you can already rename the columns in a report.This funct...

My colleague pointed out the button on that screen which says "Join Community", I clicked that and registered for the email digests and voila, I've got the items! Regards Bob Sleigh BT Group

Hi Kyna I can't see any discussion items when I follow that link - do I need to register or do something to be included in the Beta discussion group Regards Bob Sleigh BT Group

I've up-voted this but I'd prefer to make the ask more generic - so rather than limiting it to show the user's email address, enable the admins to select a field to use, which could be email address but could be other fields to be used as a unique identifier

And I'd like to re-iterate and expand on what others have said - 1. This change should never have been implemented into the live environment, and it concerns me deeply that Vazgen, and presumably others have the ability to make this change without any further oversight, which should have stopped him...

Hi Phil We auto-provision all users via SSO at first login and their default permissions give them access to the relevant queues - Raise a WF request/Request Addit Access etc Or you could pre-provision outside users manually and set their accounts not to use SSO Hope that helps Regards Bob Sleigh BT...