A colleague found the answer to this using the new namespace property on
include. We had to upgrade our acs commons to use the new include
param.Here's a link to the documentation and an example usage
https://adobe-consulting-services.github.io/acs-aem-commons/features/granite/parameterized-namespace-include/index.html.example: This will yield our reusable TypographyOptions
dialog with an appended small and medium in front of the namespace.ex:
small/fontSize & medium/fontSize
This is great I didn't know this was possible. If I understand this
properly would I need to do this for every property on the image dialog
that needs to change?If that's the case I'm not sure this would help
because we have 15-20 properties on our image dialog. I will definitely
keep this in mind for the future though.
Thanks @Manjunath_K,That's also how I understood it. It seems like a
pretty huge missed opportunity. It really limits the reusability of
components in my application
Hi @Manjunath_K, Thanks for reaching out. I'm aware of foundation
include but what I don't understand is how I can add to the name
field.In the example you provided both components will yield a content
structure like this:component/image/fileName My use case is that I need
to have the content structure something like this. Component
Acomponent/background/image/fileName Component
Bcomponent/article/image/fileName To further illustrate this the only
way I know as of now to achieve the desired resu...
Here's my problem I want to reuse my dialog for images using foundation
include. My use cases are in one instance I need my node structures to
be the following: component1/cta/imagescomponent2/mobile/images It may
be an oversight on my part but I can't seem to find a way that I can
include my images dialog under the differing node structure cta or
mobile. Is this possible and if so what would I use?
Turns out this was related to an SSR issue. Both of these pages were
using SSR without my knowledge and were changed between deployments.In
addition to this we weren't able to replicate locally because our local
pages are not using SSR.Strange that it was throwing a 504 instead of an
actual error but that's something to dig into further. Thanks for your
help @kiranparab !
Hi Kiranparab,I dug a bit deeper and one of my pages has a parallel page
that is published and the other isn't (ex offers > all-offers,
featured-offers) all-offers is working and featured isn't.Based on your
feedback:1. What is the author outbox and how can I validate that?2. I
don't think this is the issue we tried flushing cache and still no
luck.3. How would I know if the publisher is faulty? Isn't there only
one publisher and if it's faulty how can I fix it?
I made a change to our offers page and deployed that, after that was
done our help page is now throwing a 504.I looked into the error logs
and haven't seen anything. The author instance works fine. I tried
republishing and that doesn't work either. Just seems as if the data
won't make it to the publish instance. Why did this happen and how can I
fix it?
Hi Jörg,Correct me if I'm wrong but can this approach only be done if
you have already setup a blueprint or site to create live copies from?My
situation is that we have 200+ pages with common content that currently
aren't associated with any blueprint. So if I understand this correctly
in order to associate these sites with a blue print I would have to
re-author all 200+ pages in order to achieve the result I'm looking
for.That being said this is something I think we'll do in the future as
it's ...
On our website we have hundreds of partners that share the same content
with some of the content being unique. We want to be able to author in
that unique data but also be able to do a bulk edit if we are looking to
change for example a common title in all of these pages. The solution
I'm pursuing is to have this data filled via the properties of the page
template. By doing this I can edit all of our partners once but the risk
involved is that if any of the data is different I see
in my text fi...
