This is great I didn't know this was possible. If I understand this properly would I need to do this for every property on the image dialog that needs to change?If that's the case I'm not sure this would help because we have 15-20 properties on our image dialog. I will definitely keep this in mind for the future though.

Thanks @Manjunath_K,That's also how I understood it. It seems like a pretty huge missed opportunity. It really limits the reusability of components in my application

Hi @Manjunath_K, Thanks for reaching out. I'm aware of foundation include but what I don't understand is how I can add to the name field.In the example you provided both components will yield a content structure like this:component/image/fileName My use case is that I need to have the content structure something like this. Component Acomponent/background/image/fileName Component Bcomponent/article/image/fileName To further illustrate this the only way I know as of now to achieve the desired resu...

Turns out this was related to an SSR issue. Both of these pages were using SSR without my knowledge and were changed between deployments.In addition to this we weren't able to replicate locally because our local pages are not using SSR.Strange that it was throwing a 504 instead of an actual error but that's something to dig into further. Thanks for your help @kiranparab !

I don't think these help. The resource is just a simple http page, which should also be cached

Hi Kiranparab,I dug a bit deeper and one of my pages has a parallel page that is published and the other isn't (ex offers > all-offers, featured-offers) all-offers is working and featured isn't.Based on your feedback:1. What is the author outbox and how can I validate that?2. I don't think this is the issue we tried flushing cache and still no luck.3. How would I know if the publisher is faulty? Isn't there only one publisher and if it's faulty how can I fix it?

Hi Jörg,Correct me if I'm wrong but can this approach only be done if you have already setup a blueprint or site to create live copies from?My situation is that we have 200+ pages with common content that currently aren't associated with any blueprint. So if I understand this correctly in order to associate these sites with a blue print I would have to re-author all 200+ pages in order to achieve the result I'm looking for.That being said this is something I think we'll do in the future as it's ...