Hi Kunal, We also don't have editable templates. In the JCR, they are
stored in /etc/designs. However we don't have them in the source code as
the end customers can change them. (via the Design mode in the pages.)
Thanks Jorg. In fact, we don't change them during runtime. Mostly they
are internal lists and a few email templates, robot files etc. and a
page of "paths" - servlet resource type mappings. Maybe it was
originally thought that they would be changed on-the-fly. They all have
primary types cqPaths, but don't really render. I will try putting them
in /apps and see how I get on.!
hi guys,I'm doing the above migration (we have 6.5) and I have moved the
/etc/clientlibs to the ui.apps as required. I have a bunch of other
custom stuff in a directory called /etc/ These are some
"Pages" that contain configuration used by some of our components i.e.
not ordinary pages for Editors to use. Also some files used by the
robots/sitemap etc My question is :Is it o.k. to leave them in /etc/ ? I
know that Adobe seems to be encouraging people to stop making /etc a
catch-all place for ran...
https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/get-runmodes-value-in-client-side-js/td-p/326526
Hi folks,There is a discussion here on using a hidden field to make the
"runmode" available to client-side JS widgets. I want to do the same as
the OP.Jorg Hoh said"You should not expose the concept of runmodes to
your frontend. Instead you should define a marker which is queried by
your frontend; and this marker might be rendered directly into the page
or queried via JSON. ...
Thanks, I understand now that the Prod environment is supposed to use
the same build artefacts as the stage environment. So I won't be able to
build my frontend SPA apps with environment specific files. I'll have to
think of something else.
Thanks!I was hoping not to have to use the API, just the UI at the
start. Just to get it clear in my headIn my POM file, for the
frontend-maven-plugin, com.github.eirslett
frontend-maven-plugin
npm run stag or prod generate-resources
npm run
Then somehow I can ensure that the is
"stag" in the Staging part of the pipeline and "prod" in the Production
part ? thanks in advance!!
hi folks,I'm moving to Cloud Manager. I know how to have different OSGI
config files for stage, prod and dev.But my ui.frontend Javascript also
has different parameters for dev, stage and prod.I can make put
different npm build commands in the package.json.However, in the POM
file, I need to be able to use Profiles to have different commands for
Prod and Stage.However, I don't seem to be able to do that. Is there
another way around this? There are some environment variables like
PIPELINE_ID etc....
I'll answer my own question as it got worked out eventually. It seems
that the service-user+keystore package that I created in the lower
environments didn't import properly into the Prod environment Author due
to security checks.In the end, I created the system user manually using
crx/explorer/index.jsp in the Prod Author environment, uploaded the
keystore file (from security/users.html) , made sure
/home/users/system/blah... directory was ticked for all permissions incl
replications. (useradmin...
Hi folks,On the Author instance in the Stage environment, I created a
Service User and added a Keystore that I created via open_ssl.I used the
ACL Packager program to build a package with my service user
principaland its permissions and keystore. I then replicated the package
to the publish servers and it all worked fine. However when I came to
import the package on the Prod environment Author, Iwas not so
successful. From the useradmin screen, it looked fine. The system user
was there with all ...
Thanks Brian, I'm not actually currently developing with Forms, this is
a custom App that has to do with integrating with another Java server.
But I'll try there anyway!! thanks Fionas
Hi folks,Just wondering if anyone tried this in 6.5. I wanted to use
bcprov-jdk15on and bcpkix-jdk15on.I read here that I have to add the
jars into in jre/lib/ext and add BouncyCastle as a provider in java
security properties.I also added each package that I wanted into
sling.properties, (no wildcards), in
org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extraI thought that AEM would just
accept them then. However, I then get osgi wiring error messages which I
got rid of by adding them to my bundle pom.xml b...
Hi folks,Just wondering if anyone tried this in 6.5. I wanted to use
bcprov-jdk15on and bcpkix-jdk15on.I read here that I have to add the
jars into in jre/lib/ext and add BouncyCastle as a provider in java
security properties.I also added each package that I wanted into
sling.properties, (no wildcards), in
org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extraI thought that AEM would just
accept them then. However, I then get osgi wiring error messages which I
got rid of by adding them to my bundle pom.xml b...
config.output.libraryTarget = 'umd';config.externals = { 'react': {
root: 'React', commonjs2: 'react', commonjs: 'react', amd: 'react' },
'react-dom': { root: 'ReactDOM', commonjs2: 'react-dom', commonjs:
'react-dom', amd: 'react-dom' } }; return config ; Then I included an
umd version of react.js and react-dom.js in a new clientlib. I made the
other clientlibs dependent on it. Now my react and react-dom code is not
repeated when I have multiple react components on the page.
Hi, I found a way of doing what I wanted built on the npm plugin that
you have above, "rescript". First I stop the chunking as you suggest.
Then I added this to the ..rescriptsrc.js
OK. thanks. I get you now. We just have very simple static templates
which don't have any components or component logic. You are putting the
"div" with react id into the template whereas I was putting it into a
component to be placed in a column control.
Thanks for that. I take it that either you have ejected the CRA or you
are using some extra plugin that allows you to edit the
webpack.config.js. Then you include the css in the component ( and the
js I assume at the end of the component?). I can try this. Is it o.k. to
put CSS into a though?, I guess it works for you!. Thanks. I will
try it out.
Hi folks,I am integrating a bunch of different React CRAs into an AEM
Page template. I am not using the "SPA Editor". I'm just integrating
them directly with custom components, but I am using the very handy
aem-clientlib-generator npm plugin to create the clientlibs from
"build/static" and copy them into my AEM codebase. I looked at the JS
for each CRA and I see that the default CRA webpack configuration has
"chunked" the JS. There is one file called "main..chunk.js", one
called "runtime-main..j...
Thanks Brian. That is great info. Do you know of an on-line example of a
React component included in an AEM page as above ? I'm not currently
interested in trying out the SPA Editor. All demos I've found are for
that. tnx. Fiona
Hi folks,I want to include a react app in a simple component in a static
template page. I found the aem-clientlib-generator npm plugin to create
an AEM clientlib and that works fine. So after that, I include the
clientlib in the page and put nothing but the SPA "root" id in a
in the component sightly file ? Am I overlooking anything ?I have no
interest in "editing" the component at this time so I've no interest in
the Editable SPA. thxFiona
hi all, I have this occasional problem whereby:On our Adobe Managed
System, (not Cloud), on the crx/packmgr UI, I click on the upload
package. However, the file picker menu doesn't allow me to select a
local file to upload.Eventually after some time retrying, sometimes
hours, it will eventually work.I am in the administrators group. Any
ideas? thanksFiona
Thanks Brian, So it sounds like you can interleaf alterations to the
allowed components via the Design Mode UI and XML content packages
without running into problems.
Hi folks, We have static templates and authors do the "allowed
components" design via Design Mode. (We can also build and download the
designs via /etc/designs/ filter.) They complain that sometimes
they have to redo parts of the "allowed components", as the
configuration disappears, possibly when the components change, like
getting a new Component Group. Has anyone ever heard of this problem
before.? Another possibility is to do the "allowed components" Design
via an exported package of /etc/de...
