Must be the first time I have heard of an IT Security team wanting to turn encryption off on something. Your IT group won't work with you to get a tight exception?

I am just hoping that Adobe will gut Proof's janky engine with it's bitmap previews and aweful comment synopsis and exports and just rework it with the Acrobat engine. Problem solved.

Are they particularly large or complex videos? Did you try different file formats and codecs? The Support folks can apparently see a log of fails and see what caused it, so you might reach out to them. FOR EXAMPLE: We were getting these alot when we launched and they initially gave us some song and ...

I got the impression that "working backwards from Completion Date" is something legacy that they really don't support (or want to). Every time I tried to get details or get some hand-holding, the basic answer was "I wouldn't if I were you." It does seem to really, really, really mean you have to be ...

Be warned: We wanted to work that way as well, but our onboarding specialist strongly advised against it. They advise just manually adjusting dates to make the end date work out (active rather than passive). We tried it anyway, of course, and boy does WF act wierd when working backwards.

I just wish that Workfront:   Was more consistent whether to default to ID or name (hint: name!).At least had a little toggle or UI element to switch from ID to Name so we didn't have to dive into Text Mode every single time.

My suspicion is Adobe slipped in an update that had a bug: either unannounced, or as part of all these "maintenance updates." I noticed Adobe is in the habit of sneaking things in outside the normal release cycle, and also is not as diligent with QA/QC. Lots of "little" bugs like this keep creeping ...

I've been badgering Support since yesterday. They want me to turn-off the "restrict editing to owners and managers" settings as a workaround while they figure it out, but I wasn't keen on that idea. But between myself and some clever users, we figured out a few workarounds: It has to do with Comment...

@Lyndsy-Denk wrote: In the case of deleted comments in the proof, users are confused when they see 2 comments in the proof, but 8 comments in the document feed. They worry that they're missing key feedback. Yeah I had to solve this puzzle a few months ago (glad it doesn't happen too often). It's li...

Yeah this would be handy for hide/show logic. It would also be useful on longer custom forms so some key piece of reference data can be re-iterated in a section farther down. And yes, I'd fully expect the data changed in one instance of the field on a single custom form to be the same on all other i...