@JulioFe The Group copy function does not copy the ACL or members. The group copy just creates a blank user group. I don't know what is your exact use case. But, as per the use case mentioned in this thread, creating such large number of copies would be disastrous in long term because then you have ...

Any one facing this issue- Please note that the order parameter plays a critical role in situation where server has multiple versioned-clientlibs configurations with same name.So the simple solution is to rename your config: versioned-clientlibs ---> versioned-clientlibs-custom1. That's it.Few other...

Hi @nibedita07 ,   You don't need to try fix the code some other library has written. Simply mock the static class to save your time. With Junit5 you can mock the static class just make sure to update Jupiter dependency > 4.6.0. Sample code:     try (MockedStatic<YourStaticUtils> utilities = Mockito...

@lstockmoe2 Looks good. Just one correction in your description "only the version can be altered via pipeline variables."- you can update node/ npm version from POM.xml as well - [0]. Also explore this- [1] and try to change execution goal to run yarn install.   <execution> <id>yarn install</id>...

Your use case seems good fit for collections [0] and CUGs [1]. Not sure if you have a multi tenancy factor too; so that if a user logs in from group X, he/ she sees assets only provided read permission to the group. Multi-tenancy [2] is suitable for authoring environment where as publish tier use ca...

That would be a custom implementation but you can refer this to understand how the callabacks can be implemented for a webhook in general- [0]. But if you want scalable solution go for Adobe I/O based implementation - [1]. Sample code - [2].   [0]- https://help.smartling.com/hc/en-us/articles/126080...

Depending upon what operations your webhook doing, you need to a design a singleton controller for all incoming Heretto requests (a filter class would be best, but you can opt servlet as well). Now coming to the communication contract- your webhook may need a context identifier say request id which ...

Anyone looking at this thread- I don't see any option to create a new repo for Assets only implementation but what I got recommendations from my peers is to use the full sites archetype and comment out redundant modules (e.g. dispatcher, ui.frontend, ui.tests etc). A possible reason why we don't hav...

We have archetype for a full fledge project - AEM Sites and SPA based. Do we have any option to build code repo for Assets as a cloud service instance which does not have sites feature?