@Jaclyn Reiter , LOL - so long ago that I don't think I've kept that report so kinda had to figure out what this meant to me. What happened was that when you try to chart a checkbox, it just says No Value. Melinda's workaround is you add a calculated field on your custom form so that anything that i...

I have the same idea except it's a bit more specific to the projects tab. Please vote here as well. https://support.workfront.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/115001890928-Allow-more-visible-tabs-on-Project-screen

There's no report available on the DAM regarding asset information for administration purposes. I would've like to be able to filter assets who have a custom metadata field that's blank or null and export it to Excel. There seems to be no way to this now. The audit trail just lists the items that's ...

Try adding to your column on text mode. makeFieldEditable=true Polly Co

Yes, we're seeing the same issue. Opening a ticket. Polly Co

While I understand that may be the case for smaller generation of reference numbers, you should also see that in terms of sequential numbering that it can fail when you've switch to the next thousand generating a lot of reference data across all objects eg let's say in the next month 1809 your refer...

I believe a lot of us are doing that of some sorts - trying to make do with what Workfront currently have. Or for some, looking at other workflow solution that would accommodate this - as they say, for marketing and creative, this is an important number. Most of us believe should be a BASIC in a wor...

Not discounting what you've done for your instance but I think the main requirement is it's a sequential number. If it's just uniqueness, we would and could just use the current reference number but as there is no real logic to reference numbers as it pertains to a specific object, what we're asking...

LOL, community's down and it's sending reference ids for every refresh. Reference ID: f5a6df72-a54a-11e8-b815-0a4ccd35c2c7 Reference ID: 144f7024-a54b-11e8-9d38-0a4ccd35c2c7 Can you imagine XX years from now, what possible reference numbers you'd be looking at on Workfront ?

I agree. I'm pretty sure there's more use to setting up a field with unique sequential numbers. It's disappointing to see Workfront's reply to this. We're not asking them to remove the current use of their reference number as I'm sure some users are already using it because they had no other recours...