If you like this suggestion, also look at another similar one logged & vote for this one too. RISK OBJECT - CUSTOMISABLE

YES - This causes so much confusion - Project Owner vs Project Manager. Follow standard project methodology & use the terminology of Project Manager. Or at least provide the admins the ability to choose which term to use in their environment.

We would really like improved Risk functionality - like who logged the risk, what date the risk was logged, and a field for updates, comments. It would be nice to see the Risk functionality mimic some the Issue functionality.

This would be a wonderful addition to the product functionality!

Yes, I agree that we need the tracking on this (and many other items).

When we convert a request/issue to a task or project, we are losing the customer/submitter name. We need this info to come over with the conversion. We'd also like to have the details come over on when the request was entered, comments on the request, etc... Currently we lose all that.

This post has been closed as a duplicate. All votes have been moved to the original: Custom Form Carry Over When Converting from Issue to Task/Project Form 1: Request - I have a request process with a request custom form. Form 2: Project - Since the request can be converted to a project, I have ...

Yes,I would like the ability to limit/modify the Admin access. Since I cannot modify admin access (it's all or nothing), as an Admin I have so much overhead. If I could provide limited admin access, then I could delegate some of my functions to others.

I have made this request to Workfront in the past. The System Admin needs a way to set the default view, filter & grouping.

Heather: Nice suggestion! I will implement this. Workfront: Though we have a workaround, it is manual so prone to errors. I would still like this issue resolved