This request has been raised to the product team via the Jira CQ-4314777. The product team will triage this request to verify feasibility based on the prioritization model. This post will be updated according to the Jira request status.

@ManojSj This request has been raised to the product team via the Jira CQ-4314771. The product team will triage this request to verify feasibility based on prioritization model. This post will be updated according to the Jira request status.

Hi @Shashi_Mulugu Thanks for submitting this feature request. We are further looking into the feasibility of the request and update this thread when an update becomes available.

Hi @hgeller1 Can you clarify what will be expected from component level sync that is not achieved by component level rollout ? I understand these are different but I am referring to the end results. Can you clarify ?

Hi @hgeller1 Thanks for submitting this feature request. We are further looking into the feasibility of the request and update this thread when an update becomes available.

Hi @Suraj_Kamdi Thanks for submitting this feature request. We are further looking into the feasibility of the request and update this thread when an update becomes available.

Hi @ManojSj Thanks for submitting this feature request. We are further looking into the feasibility of the request and update this thread when an update becomes available.

Hi @vpotteti Thanks for submitting this feature request. We are further looking into the feasibility of the request and update this thread when an update becomes available.

Hi @varuns69729001 There is an existing request for the same improvement. Ref: CQ-4309204 ... Creating a new nested fragment doesn't update the structure same issue for multi-field. This is scheduled to be part of an Epic release i.e. CQ-4310349, in the first quarter of 2021.

Hi @KBWEB Thanks for clarification. There is already an existing feature request for AEM DAM recycle bin feature i.e. CQ-4236518