Someone marked this as "Implemented", but I can't tell who or when.  Is this because of "SAINT bernard", or is there other support (and if so, could someone paste a link to that information?)

I don't think it's correct to mark this one as "Already Offered".  Can it be reconsidered, or should I create a new item for this? I run into an issue quite often where a DW report that's been scheduled and running for a long time needs a column added to/deleted from it.  In order to do that, I have...

I couldn't agree more!  Suggestion #2 is probably more complicated to implement, but couldn't you do #1?  Almost all of our report suites need to be timestamp enabled, which means that every time I create a new one, I have to contact ClientCare to turn on timestamps before I can use it.  

You can change the schedule, or even the recipients, but you can't edit the report.  To do that, you have to "duplicate" it, make the changes you want and then set up the recipients and scheduling all over again.

This is considered a "Top Idea" and  it's now been "Under Review" for 2 and a half years!   Come on Adobe!

It's really amazing how long this has gone on.  (And how annoying it is to deal with.)  This is one of those cases where the problem should be considered a bug, not an "idea".  

This has been "under review" for a year and a half now.  Is there still some chance it will happen and/or will it only happen in SiteCatalyst 15?

A lot of nice things are available in SiteCatalyst 15.  Unfortunately, we use mostly Data Insertion to populate reports, and SC 15 apparently doesn't support that yet.

In the SiteCatalyst date range window, if you type in a date in the format DD/MM/YY, it defaults to the year 1000, so 1/1/09 becomes 01/01/1009.  I realize that we should all know better than to type in only 2-digits for a year, but it seems to me there are two different acceptable behaviors when we...

In the Code Manager, there's currently no way to tell if there are new versions of libraries short of downloading the same library again and doing a binary compare.  You could make this easier for us in several ways, but at the very minimum providing the date of the most recent update of each librar...