Hi,
I just wanted to check if anyone had an elegant solution to this problem - I use Git heavily in my workflow and I very often checkout my project and have a lot of touched files due to the cq:lastReplicat* properties changing. I have no interest in tracking these sorts of changes so was wondering if their's either a method of ignoring these changes in Git or avoiding checking these properties at all out of the JCR with Vlt?
Thanks
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <jcr:root xmlns:cq="http://www.day.com/jcr/cq/1.0" xmlns:jcr="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0" xmlns:nt="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0" jcr:primaryType="nt:file"> <jcr:content - cq:lastReplicated="{Date}2014-06-13T15:49:04.596+01:00" + cq:lastReplicated="{Date}2014-06-20T13:21:46.958+01:00" cq:lastReplicatedBy="admin" cq:lastReplicationAction="Activate" jcr:lastModifiedBy="admin"
Solved! Go to Solution.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi Will,
If you have lastReplicated propertyes in your version controlled content, I'd suggest revising your workflow to avoid this. In general, a given file (or, really, node), should either be managed through version control or replication (not both).
Justin
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi Will,
If you have lastReplicated propertyes in your version controlled content, I'd suggest revising your workflow to avoid this. In general, a given file (or, really, node), should either be managed through version control or replication (not both).
Justin
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi Justin,
I appreciate your help.
That makes total sense, however, I can't think of a way of working that would separate the two? Would you be able to provide an example of how an individual developer could build whilst testing in both WCM author and publish, maintaining a VC system and avoid this kind of issue?
Thanks,
Will
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi Will,
If I understand you correctly, the reason you are replicating git-managed files is because developers are running author and publish both locally? If so, they should be using Maven to deploy to publish.
If this isn't correct, can you explain the workflow you are currently using?
Regards,
Justin
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Likes
Replies