Expand my Community achievements bar.

Don’t miss the AEM Skill Exchange in SF on Nov 14—hear from industry leaders, learn best practices, and enhance your AEM strategy with practical tips.
SOLVED

JCR_OAK Mock Resource Resolver in AEM 6.3

Avatar

Level 5

I decided to see how much of a challange it would be to upgrade our 6.2 code base to 6.3

Turns out almost everything just works :) 

However some of our unit tests that make use of the AEM Mocks framework specifically those using the JCR_OAK mock resource resolver wont pass

public final AemContext context = new AemContext(ResourceResolverType.JCR_OAK);

I'm currently getting a stacktrace (shown at bottom of post). The dependencies that I'm using that I think are important to this are:

<dependency> <groupId>io.wcm</groupId> <artifactId>io.wcm.testing.aem-mock</artifactId> <version>2.2.2</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.sling</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.sling.testing.sling-mock-oak</artifactId> <version>2.0.2</version> <scope>test</scope> </dependency>

Stacktrace is:

java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to initialize JCR_OAK resource resolver factory: Unable to invoke method 'activate' for class org.apache.sling.testing.mock.sling.oak.OakMockSlingRepository at io.wcm.testing.mock.aem.context.ContextResourceResolverFactory.get(ContextResourceResolverFactory.java:69) at io.wcm.testing.mock.aem.context.AemContextImpl.newResourceResolverFactory(AemContextImpl.java:69) at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.sling.context.SlingContextImpl.setUp(SlingContextImpl.java:121) at io.wcm.testing.mock.aem.context.AemContextImpl.setUp(AemContextImpl.java:74) at io.wcm.testing.mock.aem.junit.AemContext.access$100(AemContext.java:48) at io.wcm.testing.mock.aem.junit.AemContext$1.before(AemContext.java:156) at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:46) at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363) at org.mockito.internal.runners.JUnit45AndHigherRunnerImpl.run(JUnit45AndHigherRunnerImpl.java:37) at org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner.run(MockitoJUnitRunner.java:62) at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137) at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68) at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:51) at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:237) at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:70) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to invoke method 'activate' for class org.apache.sling.testing.mock.sling.oak.OakMockSlingRepository at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.osgi.OsgiServiceUtil.invokeMethod(OsgiServiceUtil.java:320) at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.osgi.OsgiServiceUtil.invokeLifecycleMethod(OsgiServiceUtil.java:149) at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.osgi.OsgiServiceUtil.activateDeactivate(OsgiServiceUtil.java:84) at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.osgi.MockOsgi.activate(MockOsgi.java:171) at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.sling.ResourceResolverFactoryInitializer.registerServiceIfNotPresent(ResourceResolverFactoryInitializer.java:157) at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.sling.ResourceResolverFactoryInitializer.registerServiceIfNotPresent(ResourceResolverFactoryInitializer.java:142) at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.sling.ResourceResolverFactoryInitializer.setUp(ResourceResolverFactoryInitializer.java:62) at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.sling.MockSling.newResourceResolverFactory(MockSling.java:75) at io.wcm.testing.mock.aem.context.ContextResourceResolverFactory.get(ContextResourceResolverFactory.java:47) ... 23 more Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/document/bundlor/BundlingConfigInitializer at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.nodetype.write.InitialContent.initialize(InitialContent.java:88) at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.nodetype.write.InitialContent.createInitialContent(InitialContent.java:61) at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.nodetype.write.InitialContent.<clinit>(InitialContent.java:57) at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.Jcr.<init>(Jcr.java:114) at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.Jcr.<init>(Jcr.java:141) at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.sling.oak.OakMockSlingRepository.activate(OakMockSlingRepository.java:75) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497) at org.apache.sling.testing.mock.osgi.OsgiServiceUtil.invokeMethod(OsgiServiceUtil.java:311) ... 31 more Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.bundlor.BundlingConfigInitializer at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:331) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357) ... 42 more
1 Accepted Solution

Avatar

Correct answer by
Employee

Can you compare too with the core components?

They run on 6.3

https://github.com/Adobe-Marketing-Cloud/aem-core-wcm-components

View solution in original post

2 Replies

Avatar

Correct answer by
Employee

Can you compare too with the core components?

They run on 6.3

https://github.com/Adobe-Marketing-Cloud/aem-core-wcm-components

Avatar

Level 5

Thanks, I'll take a more detailed look at the samples and how it compares to my code. Hopefully get some time tomorrow, will report back with my findings!