I need some help with determining best practice solutions for site specific configuration of shared, or server-wide, items in our CQ installation that will soon have multiple sites / domains. The affected items in our server are first the error pages (404/500 pages), second the domain name mappings, third the Sling Resource Resolver mappings (also “URL redirects” and/or vanity urls), and lastly the robots.txt.
I am fairly new to both Java and Adobe CQ5. Any help you could provide would be greatly appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
My personal recommendation would be to look to your web server tier to solve most of the questions you listed above, assuming you are using dispatcher for caching.
Using mod-rewrite to handle your incoming mappings will allow you much finer grained control over them, but more significantly in my opinion you get better results for dispatcher caching. I will admit that is personal preference, but I have found it to be much more effective in production situations. You get much simplified sling mappings (because all you are concerned about is rewriting the outgoing links and those rules are based entirely on the repository paths and not on the domain name). It splits the configurations into two - the outgoing being handled by Sling and the incoming by Apache, but I think the benefits are generally worthwhile. Generally you will want some level of mod_rewrite configurations anyway to redirect any requests that contain the full paths to the short paths (to avoid SEO issues) so you aren't adding massively to you Apache configurations. There is a blog article here that discusses this approach - http://www.cognifide.com/blogs/cq/multidomain-cq-mappings-and-apache-configuration/.
For the robots.txt file one approach I have used in the past is to manage the robots.txt files in the DAM, and then use mod_rewrite to point DAM URL.
For you custom error pages the only solution I am aware of is to build the logic into you custom error page - checking the domain name and then including the correct sub-JSP based on the domain name. Another alternative is to leverage Apache to return your custom error document - the DispatcherPassError setting in dispatcher to allow Apache to handle error codes.
My personal recommendation would be to look to your web server tier to solve most of the questions you listed above, assuming you are using dispatcher for caching.
Using mod-rewrite to handle your incoming mappings will allow you much finer grained control over them, but more significantly in my opinion you get better results for dispatcher caching. I will admit that is personal preference, but I have found it to be much more effective in production situations. You get much simplified sling mappings (because all you are concerned about is rewriting the outgoing links and those rules are based entirely on the repository paths and not on the domain name). It splits the configurations into two - the outgoing being handled by Sling and the incoming by Apache, but I think the benefits are generally worthwhile. Generally you will want some level of mod_rewrite configurations anyway to redirect any requests that contain the full paths to the short paths (to avoid SEO issues) so you aren't adding massively to you Apache configurations. There is a blog article here that discusses this approach - http://www.cognifide.com/blogs/cq/multidomain-cq-mappings-and-apache-configuration/.
For the robots.txt file one approach I have used in the past is to manage the robots.txt files in the DAM, and then use mod_rewrite to point DAM URL.
For you custom error pages the only solution I am aware of is to build the logic into you custom error page - checking the domain name and then including the correct sub-JSP based on the domain name. Another alternative is to leverage Apache to return your custom error document - the DispatcherPassError setting in dispatcher to allow Apache to handle error codes.
This page might provide you with some help...it is about using dispatcher with multiple domains, and has an example of sling url mapping: http://dev.day.com/docs/en/cq/current/deploying/dispatcher/disp_domains.html
Regarding the custom error messages, is this what you are looking for? http://dev.day.com/docs/en/cq/current/developing/customizing_error_handler_pages.html
hth,
scott
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Thanks for the solutions. The solution that I ended up with for the error pages is to take the base error pages and add a few lines of code to parse out the site path from the url then check for a couple of pages in the root of the site, eg /page-not-found.html and /page-error.html. If found then I include the page using sling:include:
String pageUri404 = null; String pageUri500 = null; if (!isAuthorMode || mode == WCMMode.PREVIEW) { Pattern p = Pattern.compile("^(/content/[^/]+/[^/]+)/.*"); Matcher m = p.matcher(requestPath); if (m.matches() && m.groupCount() == 1) { String rootPath = m.group(1); if (rootPath != null && !rootPath.isEmpty()) { pageUri404 = rootPath + "/page-not-found"; pageUri500 = rootPath + "/page-error"; } } //check 404 and 500 page urls to see if they are valid if (pageUri404 != null) { Page page404 = pageManager.getPage(pageUri404); if (page404 == null) { pageUri404 = null; } else { pageUri404 += ".html"; } } if (pageUri500 != null) { Page page500 = pageManager.getPage(pageUri500); if (page500 == null) { pageUri500 = null; } else { pageUri500 += ".html"; } } } if (pageUri404 != null && (statusCode == HttpServletResponse.SC_NOT_FOUND || statusCode == HttpServletResponse.SC_FORBIDDEN)) { %><sling:include path = "<%= pageUri404 %>" /><% } else if (pageUri500 != null) { %><sling:include path = "<%= pageUri500 %>" /><% } else { //fallback for any non-existent error page. The original error page html markup/jsp code goes here }
Note that custom 404 / 403 can cause performance issue on your site. You can handle multi domain 404 through dispatcher as well by having different Error code under each virtual host. Something like http://www.wemblog.com/2013/03/how-to-cache-error-page-in-cq.html
Yogesh
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies