Your achievements

Level 1

0% to

Level 2

Tip /
Sign in

Sign in to Community

to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new
BedrockMission!

Learn more

View all

Sign in to view all badges

SOLVED

Syntax for using a variable in the pblock include statement

jx62030937
Level 1
Level 1

Hi, I'm trying to see if there is a way to include a view name of the personalization block is constructed instead of explicit

Specifically:

  • I have 3 personalization blocks with their internal names as 1234_p1, 1234_p2, and 1234_p3
  • In the delivery template, I defined a variable "var id = '1234'"
  • What's the correct syntax, if allowed, for the include statement. e.g., <%@ include view=''' + id + '_p1' %>

Thanks!

Jim

1 Accepted Solution
Vapsy
Correct answer by
Employee
Employee

Hi jx62030937,

This is not possible to achieve in Campaign delivery. When the delivery is being analyzed all personalization blocks must be known.

Using a dynamic setup like yours it will never work with the current product design.

There is a non-efficient way to try this which is not scalable and also can cause unnecessary MTA processing delay. The solution is to use a lot of if,else statements which can cater to each requirement of yours.

Regards,
Vipul

CC Gaurang Mathur , can you please mark this thread duplicate of Include personalization block with a dynamic name

View solution in original post

1 Reply
Vapsy
Correct answer by
Employee
Employee

Hi jx62030937,

This is not possible to achieve in Campaign delivery. When the delivery is being analyzed all personalization blocks must be known.

Using a dynamic setup like yours it will never work with the current product design.

There is a non-efficient way to try this which is not scalable and also can cause unnecessary MTA processing delay. The solution is to use a lot of if,else statements which can cater to each requirement of yours.

Regards,
Vipul

CC Gaurang Mathur , can you please mark this thread duplicate of Include personalization block with a dynamic name

View solution in original post