Expand my Community achievements bar.

Join us for the next Community Q&A Coffee Break on Tuesday April 23, 2024 with Eric Matisoff, Principal Evangelist, Analytics & Data Science, who will join us to discuss all the big news and announcements from Summit 2024!
SOLVED

Implementing "gettimeparting" plugin using - Common Analytics Plugins Extensions

Avatar

Level 4

Team,

We were trying to implement the 'gettimeparting" plugin using the common analytics plugin extension. We noticed that "e.getTimeParting is not a function" on the console error. However, there is no e.gettimeparting on our code and it may be from the action when I add these plugins as per the recommendation.
This causing not to fire even an image request/adobe server call as well. I understand this is a new type of implementing plugin via an extension. 

What might be the cause for not firing an adobe server call for this error? We want to see gettimeparting value on our global variables along with the normal server call page view. It would be good if anyone assists on the same and let us know for any other information.

Refer to this link for the implementation method: https://exchange.adobe.com/experiencecloud.details.102744.common-analytics-plugins.html

 

Jayakrish_0-1581071191319.png

 

1 Accepted Solution

Avatar

Correct answer by
Community Advisor

@Jayakrish Looks your config is not finding getTimeParting function, you can see implementation details here.  https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/analytics/implementation/vars/plugins/gettimeparting.html

However Analysis Workspace provides similar, out-of-the-box dimensions so you may not need to implement it.

Thanks,

Asheesh

View solution in original post

1 Reply

Avatar

Correct answer by
Community Advisor

@Jayakrish Looks your config is not finding getTimeParting function, you can see implementation details here.  https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/analytics/implementation/vars/plugins/gettimeparting.html

However Analysis Workspace provides similar, out-of-the-box dimensions so you may not need to implement it.

Thanks,

Asheesh