We were running a Halloween email campaign with a discount code. We had 3 separate UTM campaigns in which the code could've been redeemed on. When I pull the orders from the UTM campaigns, it shows 825. When I pull the discount code orders, it shows 985.
Is there a way to show the discount code orders that were not redeemed in conjunction with the UTM campaign links? I know some may have ordered by clicking the UTM campaign links and didn't use the code, and others may have found the code from elsewhere and didn't come to us via the UTM campaign links. I would like to know the difference.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Topics help categorize Community content and increase your ability to discover relevant content.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Ah sorry about that... the metric is "Orders" the logic is "exists"
You will probably need to use the Segment Builder (as opposed to the Quick Segment Builder" to do the exclusions:
So basically you want to know the usage in v23 (for "SPOOKY") that did not come from the UTM Campaign v34 (any of the variants)?
You should be able to create a segment:
HIT
Orders exists
AND
v23 equals "SPOOKY"
AND
HIT Container (exclude)
v34 contains "Halloween"
I assume you are using a "contains" logic, but you cant create the exclude container to match your specific campaigns as needed.
Essentially, the segment is looking for Order using Spooky without the Campaign association.
Good luck!
Views
Replies
Total Likes
would Order exists be under Order state? I can't seem to find an "order exists" dimension.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Ah sorry about that... the metric is "Orders" the logic is "exists"
You will probably need to use the Segment Builder (as opposed to the Quick Segment Builder" to do the exclusions:
ah great! I just used campaign "does not contain" halloween and it seemed to work! Thank you!
Ah, yes, because your tables are already specific that would work... I wasn't sure if you needed to extend to additional uses, so went with a more specifically crafted segment.
Glad it's working for you 🙂
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies