Zusammenfassung der Funktionsverbesserungsanfrage (RFE): Make Managed Publication working for Content Fragments as it is working already for AEM Sites for References. Anwendungsfall: Managed Publication for Content Fragments Aktuelles/erlebtes Verhalten: References can't be controlled in a meaningful way for Content Fragments. Modified & unpublished References are just published as part of the Managed Publication without any control about it. Verbessertes/erwartetes Verhalten: Managed Publication for Content Fragments is expected to work as in AEM Sites, incl. enhanced filter possibilities. Umgebungsdetails (AEM-Version/Service Pack, ggf. weitere Angaben): AEMaaCS Name des Kunden/der Organisation: Accenture PLC für smart Europe GmbH Screenshot (sofern zutreffend): Code-Paket (sofern zutreffend):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like the following feature - Extend AEM Assets Bulk Import to have other data sources besides Azure Blob Storage or S3 instance. Use-case: We want to import assets to AEMaaCS from other 3rd party cloud-based CMS such as Kapost and Box. Currently the best alternate option seems to be to transfer data (6.5 TB) to a S3 or Azure instance and then migrate it to AEM. Current/Experienced Behavior: No option to configure an alternate data source (save S3 and Azure) for cloud to cloud migration Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to configure custom 3rd party cloud data source to import assets and metadata in bulk from any cloud based CMS. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS - Version - 2023.03 Customer-name/Organization name: TA Digital Screenshot (if applicable): N.A Code package (if applicable): N.A @kautuk_sahni
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When you upload native XD files in AEM Assets, auto-generate a preview image like other file types: ,jpg, .png etc. Use-case: Upload .xd file, auto-generate a preview image for .xd files Current/Experienced Behavior: Generic preview icon for .XD files (see attached) Improved/Expected Behavior: preview image based on contents of XD file Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Assets 6.5.x Customer-name/Organization name: Walgreens Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - setting up possibility to configure alerts to be triggered at specific timeWhy is this feature important to you - alerts are usually triggered shortly after midnight (CET), when data for the current day has not always been uploaded to AA. This causes false alerts to be detected, such as different anomalies and "Sent=0".How would you like the feature to work - provide possibility in alert configuration panel to select a time for triggering of alert.Current Behaviour - only possible to set time granularity of alert (weekly, daily ets)
I often want to share a PDF of a Workspace project accompanied by an email explaining the context, rather than just dumping it on the recipients unannounced. Yes, there is a description field, but that's not the same as composing a proper email, or replying to an existing thread, and there may be other related materials I want to include. So I have to email the file to myself, wait for it to come, download it, then compose my outbound email and attach it. Can you please add an instant PDF download option?
When a task/issue is assigned to multiple people, individual users can mark 'done with my part.' This is not available for tasks/issues assigned to Teams. Would like the ability for anyone in the assigned Team to be able to mark 'done with my part.'
I'm passing on an idea from users from our in-house Web Design team to make the experience of checking off notifications in the in-app notifications area easier by simply making the blue dot bigger and easier to click on. The complaint is that because the target area is so small, it is difficult to click just right to activate the button and that makes it frustrating to the user when there are sometimes hundreds of notifications to mark as read -- that must be marked individually. Making this change to the "mark as read" button would be simple to implement as a "look and feel" type of improvement and would give the user a bigger target area than something just a few pixels wide relative to the message space.
Description - You're doing well with v1 of the Data Dictionary, but you still have room to improve. You need to add a line where components are missing tags. Why is this feature important to you - Yes, they are optional to add, but these are a feature that make components so much easier to find, use, and manage, that once people understand the value, they will want to be able to manage them better.How would you like the feature to work - Just like the current interface, add another line that has a filter button to view all components missing Tags.Current Behavior - Currently, we are only given the four choices below:
Straightforward idea: with folders.json effectively acting as an "all assets" query at this point, could please get the ability to segregate out what assets are retrieved by having the folderType value available for parameterization?
Description - The ability to move an assigned task by dragging and dropping to another day within Workload balancer. Why is this feature important to you - This would save out project management team time when having to reallocated or re-schedule tasks. They can utilise Workload Balancer fully, creating a filter for the assignee team and moving tasks around as required, all from one screen without the need to refresh. How would you like the feature to work - The task can only be moved to another day if the user has capacity on that day. If the task has relevant task constraints (ie not Fixed Dates) and predecessors have been applied, other tasks within the project will be moved accordingly. If the revised project completion date moves beyond the original date, an alert is shown. Current Behaviour - Whilst you can re-allocate a task to another user, it has to be on the same day as it is currently scheduled for. They only way that I can see to do this is by using the Task Summary section, alter the date and then refresh your browser, drag and drop on the fly would be much better.
Ideally all fields and all project attributes are fully populated and its the users and admins responsibility to maintain the system's data fidelity. Yet in some cases, that may not be possible (yet to be assigned, yet to be known, not the right timing etc.) Workfront currently will identify these as "No Value" and will be named as such in Groupings. To the unsuspecting reader, this may be misconstrued as "Not Important." I suggest replacing these instances with "Empty" or "Blank" to notify that the field is not populated but the overall context may still be valuable.
When creating proofs I want my recipient to first see the multipage proofs as I intend, "fit to page" or "100%" not some random size.
Currently, users are allowed to charge time against On Hold status projects if they choose to. By Workfront description, On Hold status means "The project has not finished yet, but due to some delays, the project needs to be temporarily suspended. The project manager chooses to use this status to alert users in the project team to stop working on the project, at the current time." We don't want to allow users to charge any time against On Hold projects whether accidentally or purposely. Can you include the option to disable logging time against On Hold projects in the Setup area, similar to what we currently have for Dead and Complete projects (screenshot below)?
The Adobe Target editor / publisher roles allow for separation of duties, which is a good. But let's be honest, it's wonderfully inflexible.Could we consider smashing those 2 roles together like a raging mosh pit to create something more impressive. For example:A single role where editors can publish other editors' activities, but can't publish activities they've edited themselves - keeping the 2-person workflow for compliance and security reasons in tact.Or at least allow an editor to pause an activity that's gone unhinged, so they can quickly stop the chaos and start fixing it, while still leaving the publisher the only one with the ability to "unpause" it.Or allow an editor to edit an active activity while it's still running, but the edits don't go into effect until the publisher OK's it. Similar to duplicating an activity, but without having the "restart" problem of starting a new activity and losing all the AI/ML data AND AND AND not having hours or days of downtime while the activity is being edited.
Description - Please provide documentation and support for SFTP Data Source Imports.Why is this feature important to you - Security needsHow would you like the feature to work - Please include Data Sources in this documentation: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/analytics/export/ftp-and-sftp/secure-file-transfer-protocol/ftp-sftp.html?lang=en.Current Behaviour - Currently, Adobe has support and documentation for SFTP uploads to Data Warehouse and Analytics Data Feed. Please include Data Source Imports in this list.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently, if you go and select an asset in the "Quick action" toolbar, you will see the option to smart crop and edit the asset no matter what role and permissions the user has. Causing a poor experience and confusion for the end-user because the user cannot save the changes after using it. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: ‘Quick actions’ is visible for users that don't have permission to use that was causing performance issues Improved/Expected Behavior: To have an enhancement and OOTB solution from Adobe to help end users use the "Quick action" toolbar with the actions that they can perform based on the roles and permissions Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud Manager service pack 2023.2.0 Customer-name/Organization name: Accenture Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently, if you go to the metadata schema for assets, you can leave the field blank when you use the tag field, as this is not required. If you need that the user completes all the information in the metadata, including the tags, it wouldn't have the option to force the user to fill in the value Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Tag namespace required validation that does not exist today. So the user can leave this field blank. Improved/Expected Behavior: Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud service pack 2023.2.0 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Listener to automatically download files on AEM Assets. Use-case: Easily download assets without having to to click on download inbox each time Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently users needs to click on download inbox each time to download files. After clicking on download button, user expects the files to be immediately downloaded. Instead user receives a message to check the download inbox each time a ZIP is created. Improved/Expected Behavior: Listerner that automatically downloads files after zip it has been succesfully created. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a cloud service - Assets Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Would like to have the flexibility to include the reference number that typically resides on the project overview tab, to be shown on the overall project header. our designers use this number in the naming conventions of their documents and this would be a quicker way to see the number at a glance. I realize not everyone would want this view, but if it were an option for everyone then we could choose
As an automation platform, tracking leads in a holistic manner is crucial. Currently, if your Marketo platform has an additional dedupe rule set other than just an email address, it won't differentiate between leads if the same browser has been used to fill out the form. Let's take an example: Let's say your Marketo platform has a customized dedupe rule of Email + Last name. Ideally when a lead 'A' fills out the form entering both of the parameters exactly the same as per an old lead that exists in the database then it should update the corresponding lead in Marketo else it should create a new lead. Old lead present in Marketo database: email: alokbiswas1@gmail.com, Last name: Biswas New lead fills the form with details: email: alokbiswas1@gmail.com, Last name: Biswas Then the same old lead should get updated. New lead fills another form with details: email: alokbiswas1@gmail.com, Last name: Alok Ideally, a new lead should get created as the 'Last name' is different. Current Issue1: So, when the lead fills multiple forms or even the same form in the same browser, then the old lead is getting updated even if the lead enters a different 'Last name' every time. As per Marketo, it's happening due to the cookies in the browser. Ideally, this concept contradicts the concept of the de-dupe rule Current Issue2: Let's say your Marketo platform has a customized dedupe rule of Email + workspace. Ideally when a lead 'A' fills out the form of workspace 'A' and the same lead fills the form of workspace 'B', then it should create duplicate leads instead of updating the existing one. For now, it will update the existing lead in case the second form fill happens in the same browser due to cookies. Suggestion: So, Marketo should enhance its tracking in the upcoming releases. As we have workspace-level Munchkins as well. Basically, if a lead opens the LP of workspace 'A', its respective munchkin should be linked with the lead record. When the same lead opens another LP of workspace 'B', then it should not link with the munchkin of workspace 'A' and should treat it differently.
Problem: The following filters have limited operator filters and cannot drill down to Date and TIME of activity: - Was Sent Email - Opened Email - Clicked Link in Email Impact: When Marketo has an outage (Recent outage #202305030020) that creates an issue isolated to a specific time frame (Example: 7 AM to 10 AM PT on May 3rd), and Marketo users cannot react to that issue effectively. In this recent outage, anyone who clicked a link in an email within that timeframe was faced with a 404 issue. This resulted in a poor customer experience (cannot access desired content) and lack of trust in our brand (looks like we made an avoidable mistake). Suggestion: Expand on filter operators and filter options so users can drill down into more specific timeframes. Here are some examples:
I'd like to see parent tasks automatically attach the milestones to the child tasks.We need reporting to pull all tasks associated with a milestone phase to see summary duration, planned hours, actual hours on all tasks under that Milestone regardless of the Parent Task Name or Project Name. Currently, the milestone only is can only relate to one task.
We are in the process of implementing time tracking, and in our current maturity model, we only want to track time on the project level, not at the task level (I know we'll get there soon, but for the sake of simplicity....). Can we add something under Preferences, or even a simple filter, to remove tasks from timesheets? And have that be determined on the Group level?
Problem: Marketo has no way currently to pause the sending of ALL emails in an instance. Impact: When Marketo has an outage that results in redirects not working for all links, this creates a very poor experience for email recipients. In this case (Recent outage#202305030020), the 404 page is not descriptive or helpful for the recipient, and they are more likely to unsubscribe and not trust our brand. We also continue to perpetuate the issue as emails continue to send emails with links that will not work. Suggestion: Build a way for Marketo admins to pause and later reactivate sending of ALL emails across an instance.
Description - I don't see a way to do min/max on an Area Chart. Was wondering if this is something quick that can be added to the chart options. Sometimes I don't want to have to hover to bring up the numbers, and it would help a report viewer, at a glance, see if our numbers look better month over month for the max of the chart, for example. Why is this feature important to you - It helps round out features for each chart type available, especially such a similar chart to the line chart - the area chartHow would you like the feature to work - I'd like the area chart to feature a min/max, just like the line chart. Current Behaviour - There is no min/max to the area chart currently.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
