Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enhancing Search Feature of Connected Assets with Path based search to Remote Assets in AEM 6.5 Use-case: Authors uses Assets finder in Media Library by using search features such as Keyword,Path,Tags etc. Whereas in Connected Assets 6.5 we just have search by Keyword|Tags but its not supporting Path based search which is a big degradation in author experience when they switch to use connected assets from AEM Assets Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM Author when using Connected Asset to fetch an Asset from Remote Asset unable to search Asset bu Path similar to Asset finder in media library Improved/Expected Behavior: Include Search feature similar to Asset Finder of Media Library Which is path based search in AEM 6.5.I hope this feature is available in CaaS. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 SP17 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: This is an outcome of support case - E-001180834. The support team determined that when the content copy tool is run for AMS linked cloud manager the tool fails if there were any modifications in the copy source Use-case: The tool is used frequently to downstage the content from prod back to the lower environments. It is not practical to pause all activities in the environments to perform the stage down Current/Experienced Behavior: Content copy tool breaks in cases if the server content is updated Improved/Expected Behavior: Content copy should run independent of system usage Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AMS - AEM 6.5.16 Customer-name/Organization name: Philip morris international Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enhancing the IP Allow Lists functionality in Adobe Program Overview for Experience Manager Use-case: Providing users with IP Whitelist access to specific domains Current/Experienced Behavior: Recommendation 1 - Improve how environments are applied for an IP Allow List Name. Currently, you have to go into the specific environments and add the IP for all relevant segments (author, publish, preview). Recommendation 2 - When adding an IP Allow List Name to the dispatcher/publish environment, there is no warning that this will stop all other users from viewing this environment. This can sometimes be an easy mistake with a significant impact. Improved/Expected Behavior: Recommendation 1 - Improve how environments applied are adding for a IP Allow List Name. Allow admins to add/remove environments in IP Allow List view provided below. Recommendation 2 - Add an alert for this scenario so users are aware before applying the rule. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Openreach Screenshot (if applicable): Recommendation 1 - Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Cloud Manager - Table view - Order table data by column Use-case: Example:"Cloud Manager" -> "Services" -> "Domain Settings".We have round about 100 Domains configured in "Domain Settings".The Domains are listed in a table view with pagination function at the bottom.The latest Domain entry is alway on top of the table.We would like to have a function to order the table data by each column (Domain Name; DNS Record; SSL Certificate attached; Environment applied) Current/Experienced Behavior: You can't change the order of the data in any table view within cloud manager to get a better overview Improved/Expected Behavior: You can order table columns in all cloud manager views Same feature would be helpful on all other table views within cloud manager to be able to order table data Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: B. Braun SE Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: As of now AEM author session is getting logout either user is active /inactive.is it possible to add in author a feature of “Pop-Up” to users (well in advance) informing about time out and allowing users to save work Use-case: it is useful for author to get notified to save their work. Current/Experienced Behavior: As of now AEM author session is getting logout either user is active /inactive. Improved/Expected Behavior: To add in author a feature of “Pop-Up” to users (well in advance) informing about time out and allowing users to save work Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5 cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Shell Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently asset management is interlocked with site management, i.e. moving assets in the asset module requires republishing of pages in the sites module instead of just updating the asset references in the affected pages, especially on Publish. Use-case: We have dedicated asset and site managers. When an asset manager moves an asset the site manager is required to republish the page(s) with this asset to update its references on the page. This can become a hassle when page(s) with the asset are being reworked. These pages are not ready to be republished. Due to this dependency asset and site managers cannot work independently. Current/Experienced Behavior: When assets are being moved, affected pages need to republished Improved/Expected Behavior: When assets are being moved, asset links on affected pages should be updated without the need to republish the page Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS latest, likely affects any AEM version Customer-name/Organization name: Munich Re Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enhance the publish/unpublish process on blueprint pages with a warning if the rollout configuration "Activation on Blueprint activation" or "Deactivation on Blueprint deactivation" is in place. Use-case: To efficiently manage large website the ootb rollout configs "Activation on Blueprint activation" and "Deactivation on Blueprint deactivation" are available, see: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-65/content/sites/administering/introduction/msm-sync If you have set this up for e.g. on livecopy root page there is no indicator available which shows the editor, maintaining the blueprint page, that with publish a blueprint page or unpublish this action takes also place on the livecopy. So, it could happen that accidentally a livecopy page goes on or offline. Current/Experienced Behavior: No hint for the editor once he publishes or unpublishes a blueprint page that on the connected livecopy page the same action is performed. Improved/Expected Behavior: If you publish or unpublish a blueprint page, the warning is shown that x liveopy page will also go on or offline. With that user is aware and can decide and check. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Our system currently sends out automated emails to an uploader when an asset they uploaded expires. Would like to have the ability to this email to go out to more than just the uploader? Use-case: A team to have the ability to see when an asset has expired instead of one person. Current/Experienced Behavior: Our system currently sends out automated emails to an uploader when an asset they uploaded expires Improved/Expected Behavior: A group of AEM members to have the ability to see when an asset has expired instead of one person. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMAACS Customer-name/Organization name: Epsilon Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Move/Copy of Context-Aware Configurations when a page is moved/copied Use-case: Pages with special CAC's (like header, footer ...) are moved/copied and all the CAC's have to be manually set again in the destination tree. Current/Experienced Behavior: When a page with specific Context-Aware Configs (set below it) is moved or copied then all the CAC's (below /conf) remain in the same place so the editors have to redo the configurations every time. Improved/Expected Behavior: It would be easier that when page (or complete tree) is copied or moved that also it's related CAC's (/conf) are also copied/moved. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS 2024.4.16145.20240430T082417Z Customer-name/Organization name: Pictet/One Inside Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently for deploying code to RDE, developers have to use aio rde plugin and don't have a provision for configuring a pipeline to directly deploy through a branch. Also, huge packages of content need to be moved either through aio or via package manager. User should have a provision of deploying code through quick pipelines which are meant for simply deployment and should also have a provision for quick content movement from DEV/Stage/PROD environments to RDE. Use-case: Quick deployments to RDE Current/Experienced Behavior: time consuming process for making a RDE in complete working state Improved/Expected Behavior: Quick deployments to RDE Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: GSPANN Technologies Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When a document is shared with someone and a new version is posted, an automatic notification should go out to alert all who it had been shared with.
Description - Ability to either create a report or use the resourcing tool(s) to project a roll-up of resourcing/hour needs for various slices of time (ie next month, next quarter, next week, etc.), regardless of whether the hours have been “assigned” to a user or not. We also need to be able to see across multiple clients and scopes. Why is this feature important to you - Will allow critical visibility into future resource demand, regardless of current planned assignments. How would you like the feature to work - Integrated into current offerings within Workload Balancer. Either add an report/export feature to WLB, or connect the Resourcing function to reporting so we can build custom reports that integrated data from WLB/Planner/Utlization. Current Behaviour - Each feature within Resourcing does only a piece of what we need. WLB doesn't export reports; Utilization requires breaking the data into tiny fragments; Planner only shows assigned hours.
To avoid creating projects labeled Part 1 and Part 2 for Agile projects, we could implement a feature to "park" tasks that are not yet confirmed or planned. These tasks would be hidden from the tracker, appearing greyed out to indicate their status. This way, we can still view them, but they would not be included in our workload balancer. This feature would also prevent the need to set all planned hours to zero until the tasks are confirmed.
While performing our regular application review, we observed this application allows Maker to add/delete users. Although we process the orders with attentively, but we also want to implement control check point in the application/process to confirm accuracy. Reason being that there can be instances of human error while provisioning the ID. To address this concern, we suggest implementing a Validation (Checker) step within the application, allowing an analyst to review and approve any addition or modifications performed by the maker.
Need breadcrumbs for document details page. document details page does not display folders/sub-folders in bread crumbs in upper left of screen. clicking on link in an email notification for a document posted takes you to the project but does not tell you where you are in the documents folders/subfolders
It would be helpful to add the folder to the breadcrumbs on a document. At this time, when a user is tagged in a document and they need to know which folder it was put into, it requires navigation to the documents level to search through each folder to find the document.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Update the data type of the Tags field within the GraphQL schema from String to Tag Use-case: Fetch the Tag Title using GraphQL query for AEM Headless Current/Experienced Behavior: _tag: [String], tagPropertyName: [String] Improved/Expected Behavior: _tag: [Tag], tagPropertyName: [Tag] Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.x & AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Based on a particular template, we'd like to show or hide particular fields from the user on the Project Settings Screen to make it easier for them to populate just the fields they need to fill out. Since we have created the template with certain settings defaulted, the user doesn't need to address those fields, so why have them scroll past them all. Project Settings could be a layout template?
Description - The current form capabilities do not allow users to color, highlight, strikethrough, etc. to text within a Comments Field. It also does not allow users to copy and past images into the field. Why is this feature important to you - We are replicating the existing briefing process that is currently being done via Word and/or PDF which allows for this. This limitation is causing issues when we are now trying to systemize this process. How would you like the feature to work - Add Rich Text Capabilities to the Comment Fields within Workfront Current Behavior - Using Bold, Italics, <>, and the Update section to identify who made updates/changes within a Comments section. This is the #1 compliant of our solution and can potentially delay our enterprise rollout of our solution to the organization until this if resolved.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - We need to implement Web SDK Analytics for over 1000 sites How would you like the feature to work - We want that we can create one global launch property with certain set of rules and then call these rules in another launch property for dedicated websites. So that if we make changes in the global launch property, it automatically gets reflected in other launch properties as wellCurrent Behaviour - Currently, we need to copy rules from one launch property to other and if there is some change in the global template property , we need to make changes for all the properties again
Templates and process management could be streamlined by allowing for system individual roles to be assigned to a task, similar to how you can apply these to a task approval. As an organization, we are looking at ways to make creation of templates and general process design more efficient, such as assigning a task to a "requestor". Ability to apply a Project Owner, Project Sponsor, Portfolio Owner, Program Owner, etc. to an assignee field. Attached a mocked-up example.
Description - Workfront allows you to attach files in the Updates section of an object (Allow users to add images in updates setting must be turned on), the attachment shows in the update feed. However, the document is not saved in the source object Documents tab. Why is this feature important to you - Our practice is to move all documents to G Drive as part of our project managements. We are unable to move any documents added through the updates feed because they don't show up in the Documents area. In addition, we do not have access to additional document features like comments, versioning, details, and proofing. How would you like the feature to work - Would like to see the attachment added to the source object Documents tab. This would allow all documents to be managed centrally on the object or parent object. Current Behaviour - Currently, when you attach a file in the Updates section the image appears in the Updates section. However, the document is not saved in the source Object documents tab. Instead it is saved in the user's main Documents section.
Description:Update the functionality so that when multiple teams are assigned to a task, every team receives a notification when the task is ready to begin. The current functionality only notifies the first team that is assigned to the task. Looking at this screenshot, the Digital Imaging Team was notified when the predecessors of the task were complete, but the Photography Team was not notified. Why is this feature important to you:It is important that every Team (every person on the team) is notified when they have work that is ready for them. The project can have delays when users aren't aware of a task that is ready to begin. How would you like the feature to work:I would like the ALL teams assigned to a task to receive the "A Dependent Task You're Assigned to is Now Ready to Start" notification. Current Behavior:Currently, only the first team assigned to the task receives the "A Dependent Task You're Assigned to is Now Ready to Start" notification. Other teams are not notified.
Consider changing the To-Do widget so that it creates issues rather than tasks since, often times, a to-do is a short, simple item to accomplish. Additionally, consider allowing editing the task project details since it's considered best practice for a project to belong to a portfolio.
It would assist our Resource Managers if the Workload Balancer could appear in the left panel of the portfolio view as it does in project view.With the current available filters in the Workload Balancer we can’t reduce the people results down to what we want to see, so seeing only the tasks and assignments among team members within a specific portfolio would help with our ways of working.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
