Description - Add an option to have text in a proof read aloud wherever text is selectable and not build into an image. Why is this feature important to you - There is no option to have text within a proof read aloud like you can in a PDF. This is vital when proofreading something as it helps to hear any issues instead of relying on visually catching them. How would you like the feature to work - Have an icon to select to have text read aloud, ideally with some better functionality than even a PDF to have it work similar to Word where it starts reading from where your cursor is located with a start/pause button, and simple settings to adjust speed and voices. Current Behaviour - Not possible, and no browser extensions or Windows narrator seem capable of doing it because of how a proof is integrated in the browser where you can't select text. Having the option to highlight text outside of a comment would be helpful in general since we currently have to download the PDF to select the text and transfer it to Word to run a simple spell check.
Description - In current scenario whenever an asset (segment/calculated) metric is updated/modified, the prior definition cannot be accessed.The version control feature in (segment/calculatedMetric) would allow users to keep track of how this asset evolved over a period of time and also roll-back to last aligned / approved state whenever required. Why is this feature important to you - We have multiple assets that are maintained and are used for downstream reporting / use-cases (For example: Tableau dashboards / Bigquery tables etc). In case of data mismatch between AA and Tableau the primary reason always have been underlying AA asset was modified. The biggest challenge is to retrieve prior definition which was aligned for downstream system reporting. How would you like the feature to work -- Specific Tags that can be applied to (segment/calculatedMetric) assets, and these tags ensure any changes made to assets need to be approved by owner/system-admin/product-admin. With last approved state/definition available to roll-back in case required. Current Behaviour -Once a (segment/calculatedMetric) is updated, only the meta-data (Last modified By) is updated, the prior definition JSON payload are not accessible. So It is difficult to determine what has changed /or roll-back.
In the new Adobe app SDK - mobile lifecycle events (such as install/crash/upgrade) are only available in Adobe Analytics - and are not exportable via Data Feeds - refer attached image for example metrics I am referring to We expect that we can export lifecycle events in a similar manner as - so that we can import this data into our own data lake and BI platform for our own analysis In the previous (n w legacy mobile app sdk) this data was available in the Adobe Analytics Data Feed I see this as a feature regression and request that this feature be enabled/developed for the current app SDK Thanks Justin Kelly
Description -Why is this feature important to you - Analytics help leadership understand the positive impact workfront has on our organization. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to build reports or dashboards with information pulled from enhanced analytics, so leaders can see the analytics information in an already curated timeframe, portfolio, and to be able to add filters to show relevant information. Current Behaviour - it is not possible to pull this data into reports or dashboards currently.
Description - Currently there is no way (as far as I know) to view the rule setup (the UI definition) of a segment which is created with an PQL expression (and without an ansibleDataModel) through the API. Why is this feature important to you - We are currently automating the creation process of multiple batch / edge segments, across different sandboxes. Since we are not able to reverse engineer the ansibleDataModel, we are creating the segment with a PQL expression. This gives us a segment which we are not able to look at in the same way as manually UI-created segments How would you like the feature to work - Maybe generate the ansibleDataModel based on the PQL-expression automatically (if the ansibleDatamodel is missing in the request). Also it would be nice if we could set a UI_read_only-flag on the segment, so we can assure that it is not changed by the users in the UI. Current Behaviour - Segments created through API with a PQL-expression (where ansibleDataModel is missing in the request) get the following error, when clicking "edit audience": Audience can't be loaded This audience has been edited outside of the Platform Segment Builder and is no longer editable within the Segment Builder interface.
Description - Add functionality to update VRS owner through API. When the identity of an Analytics asset owner is removed from the system (and someone new is added) the need for updating the old owner on Analytics assets is araising. Currently it is possible to change owner through the API on all other Analytics assets, but not VRS,Why is this feature important to you - In our case, when changing identity service, the old user's assets were soft deleted and we needed to transfer all assets registered on "unknown user" to the new identity of the owner.How would you like the feature to work - Owner update is reflected, in the same way as on the other Analytics assetsCurrent Behaviour - When sending in a new owner in an update request on a VRS, this is not reflected, even though the response is 200.
Description - Currently it is not possible to handle tags through the APIWhy is this feature important to you - The administration of tags on segments/audiences is important for us since we are trying to create the same tags in CJA. This is not possible at the moment, since we cannot make a lookup on the tagId, to get the name(value) of the tag. How would you like the feature to work - I would like CRUD operations on segment/audience tags available through the APICurrent Behaviour - Adding tags and listing tags can currently only be made through the UI.
Description - Workfront support finally got to the bottom of why our instance consistently runs into projects scheduling over time off and not resolving itself overnight: "The work per day updates (which correlate to the Workload Balancer) are intentionally excluded due to the amount of data that the recalculation handles." The only workaround is to manually push timeline recalculations.Why is this feature important to you - This calculation limitation is debilitating when an instance handles hundreds of active projects at a time. For reasons outside of my control, I was unable to update system schedules with our holidays until December and January—well after we had preloaded 2024 work. Our capacity planning data is now skewed because we have hundreds of projects that haven't recalculated automatically to accommodate holidays. We expect automation for something like this and instead are asked to spend precious time pushing a button.How would you like the feature to work - Automatically recalculate timelines. Warn admins if automatic recalculation isn't possible and provide guidance on how to resolve the error.Current Behaviour - Despite configurations, Workfront has stopped doing overnight timeline recalculation without warning. Users must manually recalculate—and even that doesn't always adjust schedules around time off.
How difficult would it be to have the Serialized Event ID increased from 20 characters to 32 characters or more?Current 128-bit GUIDs are typically 32 characters (alphanumeric) in length, and requiring the truncation and/or trimming of characters and dashes reduces the ability to effectively ensure uniqueness as well as trust in the reliability of the process. The use of these types of IDs is a business requirement in our organization because of other dependent systems behind our processes.I'm betting I'm not the only person who is being frustrated by this particular constraint. Hoping this is something Adobe can quickly take action to support.Thanks in advance!
This field would let me know if the statusUpdate was completed for a particular weekWould be useful in reports to show if the statusUpdate has been completed
A nice feature would be to allow for users to expand a breadcrumb trail and keep it expanded when navigating around... keep it sticky! This would mean users would not have to keep pressing the more option to view to see the same thing!
Description - It would be great if we can have multiple goal metrics (ex- success rate of 10 buttons individually instead of one single goal metrics which counts success if anyone clicked any of 10buttons) Why is this feature important to you - In the current scenario, we can only set one goal metrics per activity, however in many use-cases we would require adding multiple goal metrics per activity. How would you like the feature to work - Would like to have the option to add multiple goal metrics per activity and to allow playing with these metrics in the A4T report to get the insights from the reports. Current Behaviour - Currently we are allowed to set only one goal metric per activity.
Description - Is there a way to show all active users on a proof in Workfront similar to how Microsoft Onedrive let's you see other active users when sharing and working on Xcel, Word or PPT documents? OR can we build in a warning prior to uploading a new proof that someone is actively currently working in a proof prior to uploading a new proof. Why is this feature important to you - We are having issues where we don't know people are still working on a proof that they are not the primary decision maker or a decision maker at all, a new proof gets uploaded, they get locked out of the previous proof and we didn't make those changes. OR they get locked out in the middle of commenting unexpectedly. How would you like the feature to work - An icon at the top of the open proof with initials like MS Sharepoint/Onedrive shared documents so you know who is currently working on a proof. Also, a warning that pops up when you upload a new version that someone is currently active in the proof so you don't upload the new document. Current Behaviour - No way of knowing who is active and a new comes up and the active users gets kicked out and can't continue commenting because the previous version just locked with the upload of the new proof version.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Page Move rollout config should not only adjust links in referencing pages but also should re-publish them if editor does not decides against Use-case: For managing multinational and multilanguage websites with AEM, we use MSM with blueprint/livecopy to maintain it in a efficient way. Also, as we want to have also structure every time in sync, we are using Page Move Rollout configuration to ensure that also page moves are applied in the livecopies through the rollout. See chapter "To fully realize a page move ..." here: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-65/content/sites/administering/introduction/msm-best-practices.html?lang=en#structure-changes-and-rollouts Current/Experienced Behavior: Let me give you a most simple example: Imagine you have two pages, page A and page B. Page B has a link to page A. Both pages are rollout out to a livecopy and are published. Livecopy has page move and standard rollout config. Now, you move page A to some other structure in the blueprint (e.g. below page C). Doing that, the page move dialog provides option for adjustment and republishing of the referencing page - this is fine and works. To bring this changes to the connected livecopy, you roll out page A. With that, page A getss moved in the livecopy as well and the referencing page B is modified. But because page B was published before, you as an editor now have to manually re-publish this page!Imagine you have 10 livecopies or more connected and not just one page which links to the moved one (but maybe 100) => this is an ENORMOUS effort to do the manual re-publishing since you first have to gather all the referencing pages! To sum up: this is not Enterprise CMS like and does not match our expectations how a CMS should support editors work. Improved/Expected Behavior: If you have Page Move rollout config in place, the system should check if the page you roll out has a cq:LiveSyncConfig node with the property cq:moveTarget in the livecopy page (which indicates that blueprint page has been moved). If yes, system should bring up a dialog showing the referencing pages in the livecopy were user can decide if adjustment or re-publishing should occur similar to standard move dialog. With that the manual work not apply!And, I mean the system is currently adjusting the links - it knows that pages and touches them but it is NOT performing the other step about re-publishing. This is really disappointing! Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - When using Week of Year as a dimension, I'd like the weeks to default to sorting in chronological order (the same behavior as week) Why is this feature important to you - I can't build out a dashboard for clients and break out by week number, which they'd prefer, if the table is sorted by metric value. How would you like the feature to work - when breaking out by time/date dimensions, such as week of year, the dimension items should be sorted in chronological order (not by metric order) Current Behaviour - the table is sorted by the value of the first metric, leading to week numbers being jumbled up.
The creator/owner of a segment should be able to share edit access to others (not just read-only access).We have teams of analysts that share responsibility for reporting. When one of them creates a segment, their teammates can't get access to subsequently edit that segment. Example: Some time after a segment is created, an issue is identified, or a request is made to update the segment definition. Within the team responsible for maintaining the reporting, currently *ONLY* the original author of the segment can make updates to it. If they're unavailable due to workload or they're out of the office, the request can't be transferred to another team member. The owner should be able to share edit access across their team so that a peer can pick up the work.
Feature Request Description: The current report suite data from Adobe Analytics is presented in a two-column tabular format, which includes the data type and its associated details. For instance, one row might display "Conversion Variable" alongside details such as "Conversion Variable 6. Status: Disabled". This format lacks complexity, making it challenging to parse individual attributes into separate columns without advanced Excel or Python skills.Importance of the Feature: Digital Marketing professionals, who are the primary users of Adobe Analytics, typically do not possess advanced technical skills in Excel or Python. Therefore, the current data format can be a significant barrier to effectively utilizing the analytics data.Suggested Improvement: To enhance usability, I recommend that the data in the second column be separated by a delimiter, allowing for easier parsing and manipulation of the data into distinct columns. This change would greatly facilitate the analysis and interpretation of the data for users without advanced technical expertise.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to synchronize CF updates to multiple Live copies from CF Edit UI Use-case: MSM for Content Fragments Current/Experienced Behavior: To synchronize changes to a live copies, we need to synchronize them one-by-one from References panel Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to synchronize CF updates to multiple Live copies from CF Edit UI Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM July 2023 Cloud release Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Create a new user group setting to restrict users to create( read only ) segments and calculated metrics but able to change report suiteWhy is this feature important to you - Currently if an organisation has multi brands and we have multi report suites. We want certain users to have read only access to segments but at the same time able to change report suites. As of today there is no combination setting like thisHow would you like the feature to work - I would like to have a user group setting that would enable me to customize the settings as I need as aboveCurrent Behaviour - There is only restrictive setting which does not let users change report suites too
Description - Add Admin setting to prevent users from moving Tasks that have logged Hours tied to it. There already exist settings to prevent users to delete hours with logged hours here and here. We need to be able to configure a similar setting but with respect to the ability to move a task from one project to another with logged hours. Why is this feature important to you - Without this feature, users are able to move a Task with logged Hours from one Project to another and the Hours get stuck in a state where they stay with the original Project but are no longer tied to a Task. We leverage meta-data on Tasks when reporting on Hours so it's critical that all Hours are tied to a Task. How would you like the feature to work - Ideally this works similar to the settings that manages whether users can delete Tasks with logged Hours, except we want to prevent them from being able to move tasks with logged Hours. Current Behaviour - When a user attempts to move a Task that has Hours tied to it, they get a pop up that states that the Hours will stay with the Project but most users don't understand what that actually means or the downstream impact of that decision. In most cases, users are actually trying to just copy a Task and accidentally select the Move option instead, not realizing it until it is too late. This results in Hours that are no longer tied to any Task and are unable to be tied back to a Task without needed Adobe Workfront Engineering Support.
Description -Would like the ability to duplicate an expense entry (much like we have the duplicate function for tasks)Current Behaviour We have expenses that are exactly the same within projects but must be split into separate expense entries for each location. Some such expenses may have 10 locations. Right now we enter 10 different expenses.
Description - To get some order into dashboards, I sometimes use a Text visualization. Unfortunately its title must have at least one character text in itWhy is this feature important to you - Make dashboards more cleaned up without the need to add a character like "."How would you like the feature to work - Allow no text (see screenshots)Current Behaviour - When the "Text" is removed and confirmed, it snaps back to "Text" Select TextDelete text Meh!
Description - When attempting to access AEM assets through WF documents section, if an asset is not available, then it should show the appropriate HTTP code instead of generic 404Why is this feature important to you - It will speed up the debugging process and give feedback on why asset retrieval failed.How would you like the feature to work - When a user clicks on the preview of a document that is an AEM asset, and they are not authorised, they will encounter 401 error with appropriate error message. When a user clicks on the preview of a document that is an AEM asset, and the AEM instance is not functioning, it will show the 500 error.Current Behaviour - You just get the 404 error.
We need our activity-related smart lists to be able to differentiate between a call attempt and a call connect based on the value the salesperson enters in the Task Type field (e.g. "Call" for an attempt and "Call Connect" if an actual conversation occurs). Having "Type" available as a constraint in the Activity was Logged filter would enable us to do this.
Description - In a displays settings, have the ability to display individual data-point totals. For example, this will allow an analyst to display the totals for each bar in a chart (see image). In the display settings you could set the display to be in top, or inside the bar top. when the width of the chart is decreased, the totals will begin to show only every other bar, and eventually only the max/min as the display grows skinnier. can apply to vertical bars, horizontal bars, lines, and areas Why is this feature important to you - easier digestion of the data for leadership. I have seen in many cases they will hover over individual bars, but this would be easier if they were already displayed. How would you like the feature to work -See explanation above.Current Behaviour -you have to hover your cursor or just select max/min for lines.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
