Adobe Workfront

Description - While viewing all Project Tasks, having a dedicated Field/Column for logging Task HoursWhy This Feature is Important - Having the ability to log hours directly from the Project Tasks page and not needing to navigate to either the Task itself, or the Open Summary tab would be incredibly helpful. This would reduce User effort in logging time, while also removing any possible confusion for new Users navigating to the Task, and back to the Project, or navigation within the Open Summary tab.How the Feature Would Work - Added Field/Column to the standard Project View as a place for Users to log hours. This could be done via a button similar to the Status Icons that directly opens the ‘Log Time’ panel (without leaving the Project page). Alternatively this could be a Field where Users enter a numerical value that is then added to their Actual hours, and then removed from the Field. Current Behavior - Currently, Users need to navigate to the Task itself to log hours, or use the Op

One of the challenges we're trying to address is the amount of manual effort required for users to complete and submit multiple intake forms in Workfront at a time. To help streamline this process, we are exploring a solution that would leverage a custom web service and Workfront APIs to help automate the completion and submission of custom forms. The goal is to enable users to submit multiple intake requests programmatically while still adhering to the business rules and user experience defined within the Workfront custom forms. As part of an enhancement feature, would it be possible to allow API access to the display logic (e.g., cascading rules/conditional visibility) and/or other methods to retrieve the display logic within the custom intake forms?

The new green pop-ups at the bottom of the screen when task status is modified, such as if you click work on it the pop-up says “You’ve started working on this. The status is now in progress.” or when you remove your assignment it says “You’ve stopped working on this, the status is now new” are persistent and must be manually dismissed by users even after navigating to other objects. While having the pop-up is helpful for confirmation, we need the ability to have those auto-dismiss after a few seconds or at least have it disappear when moving to a different object in Workfront.We have users who are moving quickly through the system who now feel disrupted by having to click another item to dismiss after already clicking to change the task. They often move on quickly until these pile up at the bottom of their screen, then have to dismiss each individually. Which a large volume of work as is, any extra clicks are cumbersome to users. Thank you so much! 

Description - Before the migration to Adobe console, we were able to have two email addresses associated to each Workfront account. One email (FedID) is what our users used to login through SSO and the other (Username) is where their email notifications from Workfront went. With console this is now no longer possible and support has been unable to suggest a workaround. Would love to see this functionality restored! Why is this feature important to you - Some of our users need their notifications routed to a shared inbox for coverage purposes/so it is easy to jump in and help each other with workloads.  How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to have a field on the user profile again where I can input an email to send Workfront notifications to.  Current Behavior - Functionality no longer exists.

Description - Would love to have the option to attach a file to a request in Planning.Why is this feature important to you - We thought we had a solution to our public facing request problem through Workfront Planning's ability to create public request links. However, the inability to attach files makes it a non-viable option for us.How would you like the feature to work - Just like in Workfront Core, we would like to have the option to attach files to requests.Current Behaviour - Currently there is no file attach option in Workfront Planning.

SummaryOur team uses Claude connected to the Workfront MCP server to answer resourcing questions in natural language. Planned Hours are fully and reliably queryable today. Remaining Available Hours — the metric the Resource Planner itself calculates (schedule capacity minus time off minus existing commitments) — is not exposed through any MCP tool, and cannot be reliably reconstructed from what is exposed. We're requesting this data be made queryable so a team's full capacity picture (Planned + Available) can be surfaced through natural-language requests, not only through the Resource Planner UI.What Works TodayPlanned Hours are cleanly queryable via the insights_find_workfront_data tool, using fields such as assignment.assignment_workRequired and task-level planned hours, grouped or filtered by user, project, or date range. This lets Claude answer questions like "how many planned hours does each person on this team have this month" accurately and immediately.The GapThe Resource Planne

In the new unified approvals, when an approval template is created, there is a field for “workdays until due date”. We need this number to exclude weekends, or at least have the ability to associate with a schedule that excludes weekends, so that approval due dates do not fall on weekends without manually adjusting the due date with the calendar feature.

It would be great if the Date field could be customized, such as being able to block or highlight specific dates when the calendar pops up.  

Currently when you unassign a user from a task/issue, it automatically fills in the assignee with that user's job role. My company has never used this feature and it just creates extra work and confusion to either remove that job role or to see it in the assignments. It would be great if this is something we could disable in the setup area.

Description - After a thorough implementation, we decided to use the Request Queues built directly in the projects. The functionality is great. We have a project template set up with Queue Topics, Groups, Forms etc. The issue is that when creating requests directly in a project there is no Autosave or Drafting functionality that we know of. Our users are becoming increasingly agitated by having complex requests easily deleted at the unfortunate click out of the request window or accidental refresh of the page.   Why is this feature SO VERY important to you - Our current solution is to submit requests without auto-routing to a traffic team so the work can be saved. Leading to needing to save as you go, something that is antiquated in this day and age, especially knowing that autosave exists in many other places in Workfront, including the Global Request Queues area.   How would you like the feature to work - simply autosave as you go with a Drafts section built into the Reque

Add function to API to add nonWorkDay (NONWKD) without needing to nest beneath an object with all other nonWorkDays. Right now to add a nonWorkDay to a schedule all existing nonWorkDays must be collected first as an array. Then the array must be added to with new dates to an edit call on the parent object. The longer the schedule is used the larger this array becomes the harder it is to confirm no errors or missed dates. 

Users need to be able to filter and organize their timesheet page. The current filter option is very limited. We'd like users to have the ability to filter, view and group on the timesheet page, similar to functionality available in other sections, where standard choices are provided and the user can add, customize and share as needed.

I think this has already been submitted somewhere, but it would be great to have a feature where you can join branches of a scenario (router paths) back to the main scenario. For example, I have a form with a multi-select dropdown for brands; the selected brand determines who owns the issues, then other people are notified based on other form fields - those additional users are universal, but we need to create new issues for each brand. Some issues will only have one brand selected, some will have multiple that require duplicate issues to be created with different owners. It would be great to be able to check if multiple brands are selected, and if so iterate through the brands, creating new issues for each in a branch (if only one brand is selected, continue with the main scenario), then have that branch rejoin the main scenario and iterate through the issues to set the rest of the “universal” users based on the shared fields.

Description - We can duplicate modules in Fusion. It's frustrating that we cannot do the same with filters. Why is this feature important to you - We all know what it's like when you're working on a Scenario and then you realize you need a filter to be on the other side of a module. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to move this like a module. Instead, you have to rebuild it. And, depending upon the complexity of the filter, it can be a pain. (I'm encountering this right now.)  How would you like the feature to work - Just like you can clone a module, you should be able to copy/paste a filter.  Current Behaviour - It doesn't do that and it's extremely annoying. 

I believe I have seen this in another thread somewhere and wanted to check on it to see if there have been any updates around this feature but can't seem to find it.. This would be a HUGE win for us if this functionality was possible.   Description - Ability to utilize the same 'multi-choice' field on multiple custom form hiding certain choices.    Why is this feature important to you - We use the same "Asset Type" dropdown field across all of our different custom forms so that we can easily report on this data, however not all Asset Types should be an available option across all forms. For example:    How would you like the feature to work - Example: On Custom Form 1 we would like the 'Asset Types' dropdown to include Print, Email, Social, Web as options to choose from. On Custom Form 2 we would like to hide Web as an Asset Type for them to choose, and only display Print, Email, Social.    Current Behaviour - Currently (to my knowledge), yo

Description -Why is this feature important to you -Basic formatting (e.g. Bold, Italics, Underline, Superscript, Subscript) to assist with interacting with and responding to commenters How would you like the feature to work - Include the formatting in the commentsCurrent Behaviour - There is no formatting (e.g.Bold, Italics, Underline, Superscript, Subscript) in the proof commenting

It would be really useful to be able to italicise/bold/superscript copy in a comment that we want to include as new copy in a document that is being reviewed. At the moment, we need to type out the copy that is to be inserted and then add separate notes to design to let them know what is to be italicised/bold/superscripted. Also, it would be good to be able to add more that one format to the copy, e.g. italicised and bold

Hello,In the reports area, if you toggle on the option to “use shareable folders, you can’t see which reports are on a dashboard. You can only see that information if you have that toggle off. It’s not an option to add that column either when you have that toggle on. I think it would be helpful to see what dashboards the reports are on as well as the shareable folder as columns. Thanks!Mary

Wouldn’t it be great if we could customize the summary panel for Workfront Calendars?  I’ve tried to update the Summary Panel settings within Layout Templates, but it doesn’t appear to apply to calendars. Ideally, I would like to customize what fields pull into the calendar summary panel at the calendar level, rather than via a Layout Template. 

Description - When using the My Tasks widget, would like the ability to see completed tasks. Why is this feature important to you - My creative team like seeing completed tasks so they can quickly jump back to things if needed from this page.How would you like the feature to work - Allow this widget to pull in completed tasks from a preset Workfront filter or a custom filterCurrent Behavior - Currently does not display completed tasks as seen in the compare and contrast example below. Trying to use a filter that pulls in tasks from last week, this week and next week that are both not complete and complete, the widget does not seem to pull in completed tasks. My Tasks with custom filter: A report with the same custom filter:

 Please expose the Expense object type (EXPENSE / objCode: EXPNS) via the Workffont Claude connector, including fields such as description, amount, actualAmount, expenseType, plannedDate, billingRecordID, and projectID — this would allow us to pull full financial breakdowns programmatically rather than having to access the Workfront UI manually.Second, we need the ability to create and update Notes/Updates on projects and tasks via the connector — specifically, support for the Note object type with create and update operations, so we can post weekly status updates, comments, and log changes directly from the AI assistant without switching to the Workfront interface. 

We are going to be relying heavily on the MCP connections so being able to have visibility of their status is key. Can you please check if their status can be included on the adobe status page.

We would like the option to customize standard and event emails in Workfront, similar to how reminder emails can be personalized. This would include editing the subject, body, and HTML, not just the subject line.

Add the ability to pin or favorite linked SharePoint files or folders within Workfront (Documents area) to enable quicker access to frequently used external items, improving efficiency within the Workfront–SharePoint integration.

Current BehaviorThere is no auto-number or sequential ID field available when configuring a Planning record type. Unique identifiers must be entered manually or generated externally and written back via automation.Desired BehaviorA native auto-number field type in Workfront Planning, with configuration options for:Number of digits (e.g. zero-padded to 5 digits: 00001) Format: numeric only, alphanumeric, sequential, or random Optional prefix and/or suffix (e.g. NRD-00001 or 00001-PRINT) Starting count (configurable, not locked to 1)The field value would be system-generated on record creation and read-only after assignment.Business ImpactAuto-generated sequential identifiers are a baseline requirement for any operational record-keeping use case — job ticketing, production requests, vendor orders. Without this, teams either maintain a manual counter (error-prone, breaks under concurrent edits) or build a Fusion scenario to replicate what should be a native field configuration. We’ve encou