Adobe Analytics

When a DW request fails, I should be able to go back in, adjust the ftp site credentials & try to resend on my own.  Often, it's merely a typo on my end--putting in the wrong password.  Shouldn't have to bother Client Care with this. Thanks.

Currently the Library function does not work for Global Segments. This is a huge hindrance when we need to setup a large amount of Global Segments. This option works perfectly when building personal (unshared) segments. All the information we've been able to get is "working as intended". Please make the Library function work for Global Segments.

SiteCatalyst recently implemented the full correlation for sprops, however, this feature was not extended to report builder.  As a result, you're only able to correlate sprops where the connnections have been established.  

The rumor of a REST api for site catalyst  was good news. I suggest opening up the API so we do not have to operate under a TOKEN based  solution.  The current API calls are expensive in that you have to burn multiple tokens to get at the data.  Ideally we would like to see the API  as open as Site Catalyst and more in-line with your competitors. 

We would really like the ability to add a new social site to the list of default "Social Sites" within SiteCatalyst. Specifically, we need to have RebelMouse (https://www.rebelmouse.com/) added and according to ClientCare additions to that list are not possible. Any possibilty of requesting a new list addition in the future? 

In version 14, up to 200 report suites could be added to a single rollup. In version 15 rollups were overlooked in the initial release, but eventually were included. The cap, however, dropped down to 40, which is well under the size of many of our rollups. So if you can't increase the number of rollups allowed, you should be able to nest them. Client Care told me it would cause problems if the nightly roll-up function was occurring on the nested account before the individual rollups were done, but you could kick off the process for nested rollups the following night. Obviously, there are many ways you could fix that issue and give us more flexibility in our roll-up reports.

Our domain is acs.org.  In admin we need to add acs.org to our internal link filters, but still want to see a subset of  sub domains of acs.org, such as pubs.acs.org  and cas.acs.org.  Goal is to see these subdomains in our referring domains report.  Need a way to add exceptions to the internal link filter in admin for specific sub domains of acs.org.

With SiteCataylst 15 migration we noticed that error pages report disappeared. The only solution to this seems to be an additional prop = not handy at all.We would vote to re-introduce error pages report.

404 pages have their own report "Pages Not Found", so I'd like to have them removed from the standard Pages report.

Unfortunately, it does not seem like you can use dynamic variables to populate a hierarchy variable. For instance, if you want to do this: s.hier1 = "D=gn" to automatically assign the pagename to a hierarchy variable (a common use-case), it cannot be done. Can we get this enabled so we can populate hierarchy variables like we would with eVars and props?

In the segment selection interface, it'd be handy if the drop down box could be split into two so that you can select the relevant folder and then pick the relevant segment. I've got hundreds of segments, some of which I rarely use which make the list really long. It's possible that it's just me though, but I'd be interested in what the average number of segments are that each discover user has. My guess is that regular users will have a considerable number. Failing that, a more logical sort order would be helpful. It looks to me like it's coming through in chronological order of when the folders were created or some random thing like that. BTW - segmentation in sitecat V15 is brilliant. Just need to iron out a few issues to make it really rock.

Hey,a few weeks ago I was at an Omniture Training. The trainer was showing us the features of the report builder. It is to 98% the same like the Excel-Plugin. The Excel-Plugin was for free. Why do I need to pay for the Report Builder? Interesting business model: Change the name of a product and make it cost something...Please make the Report Builder available for all user for free! Regards, Hjalmar

When creating a new segment you first have to select e.g. the visit container. Then you have to select a report from the list of all available reports, s.props,eVars.... The list could easily reach hundreds of rows and it is hard to find the right row even it is in alphabetical order. Because translation is sometimes really surprising it's even harder if you are using a different language than English! Regards,Hjalmar

Hello, we are using SAINT to group data for our monthly reporting. We often have files with about 2-3 Megabyte. The Upload allows just 1 Megabyte. Due to security issues in our company FTP Ports are locked. So we can't use FTP to upload Files. It is a lot of stupid additional work to cut the files in slices to get them below 1 Megabyte. Why don't you remove the Limit or put it up to 5 Megabyte. 95% of our Files have less than 5 Megabyte. This size could be easily handled by a Web-Upload.Kind regards,Hjalmar

I have to say this is a good and solid new release. However I believe on the “Add Rule Set” we need to have a ability to filter by RSID, lets say your working with a large organization and they have different RSID defined based on locations like USA, UK, France, DK. They all have different marketing teams with different set of goals in mind but all use the same eVar number. By having some sort of RSID filter we can easily look for that global eVar by filtering the RSID, this can reduce errors and mistakes. Having a large list is not a good option.Please let me know what you think.... Many thanks.Mehdi

When analyzing content performance, I'd like to analyze data from launch through a certain time period (e.g., from launch through 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, etc.). Since I'd like to measure unique time periods for each piece of content, can we implement this functionality in Report Builder so that we can automate this process?

When migrating visitor cookies it is often required to migrate from multiple 3rd-party tracking domains (e.g. track.mysite.com and track.mysite.co.uk and track.mysite.org) to the new first-party tracking domain (e.g. track.mynewsite.com). The old, script-based method for handling visitor migration allowed you to do this easily, but the new server-side method, where Adobe do the configuration for you, does not allow this.   Instead, at best, numerous sub-sub domains must be set up, with associated secure server certificates (e.g. track.track.mynewsite.com) which is a backward step and difficult to manage. The server-side migration process should easily allow you to simultaneously migrate from multiple tracking domains into a single new tracking domain.

As an Adobe SiteCatalyst customer, we are maintaining a certain number of user logins for our internal customers. In order to optimize the limited number of user logins available to us, we conduct a monthly user audit of SiteCatalyst users. We have a set of criteria according to which we task this audit exercise, and revoke/retain users accordingly. We put down a considerable amount of efforts every month sorting the list of users falling under the deletion criteria, sending out communication to them, following up with them and then revoking/retaining user logins as per the responses. It would be a lot easier for us in terms of efforts/time if we could automate this. One idea we have is to have a logic built into SiteCatalyst login which will recognize a user who hasn't logged in for a certain duration and he will be prompted to submit a new request in the appropriate database to get a new access. For example, if we consider users not logged in for the past 1 month as the deletion crit

We would like to give users access to report suites on segment level. Quick example:We have a multi suite where data of many countries is stored. It would be very helpful to give users only access to the data of one country because they are not allowed to see the other figures.

If you scroll down quickly when selecting elements from list, Adobe ReportBuilder would fail to select some of them. In order to be foolproof, I would suggest adding a "jump to bottom of list" button and a "select all" button to the Select Item GUI.

I would love to have some sort of macros in Discover to make creating segments more scalable. For example, if I wanted to create a segment for each visit number (first, then second, then third, etc) it can be pretty tedious. Similarly tedious if I wanted to create unique segments for each of my top X marketing channels. It would be cool if I could enter a macro in the criteria of a single segment and then Discover would read that and know to make multiple segments based on the variation that the macro indicates. it is almost like taking the scalability of breakdowns but adding the flexibility of other segmentation features (different container scopes, include/exclude, etc) With this in place you could then easily make cohort reports. For example, I would create a segment for visitors that had a visit where visit number equals one and the month of that first visit was equal to a macro that listed the last 12 months. When I applied this to the report it would then automatically create 12

Make lifecycle metrics available in segment builder, as a workaround we have to copy into prop/evar using processing rules

Hi, When pulling a report with a lot of values, search keywords for example, it would be great if the most popular terms pulled in were relative to the time granularity at which the report is broken down by. Use case: I want to know each week what keywords are trending without having to manually pull a weekly report. Thanks!

While maintenance releases are being performed, Report Builder reports frewreport erroneous data. It would be better if Report Builder scheduled reports were automatically put on hold during maintenance releases.  Data delays are much easier to deal with than erroneous data.

In Discover v2, we had the ability to reorder tabs within a given project by dragging and dropping.  When Discover v3 rolled out, this was removed.  Granted, a user can still reorder the reportlets within a given tab, but please add this functionality back to the product.