Allow timesheet approvers to move time from one task to another task on a different person's timesheet. This means that timesheet approvers need the ability to add a project/task onto another person's timesheet in order to move the time.Example: Worker logged 2 hours to General Overhead, but timesheet approver/manager knows that 1 hour should have charged to a real project. Timesheet approver should be able to move that 1 hour instead of just entering a comment and rejecting the timesheet back to the worker.
Currently there is no notification that the user is notified that their hours have been pre-approved or pre-rejected.We want to make use of this feature but since there is no notification we have no way to control the hours that have already been pre-approved or rejected.
Description -When working on projects, there are times when work is required after hours. For us, this is a lot times related to deployment tasks. In the current setup, the system uses the User, Role, Team, or Project schedules to determine the duration and available dates to work on the tasks. This rigid framework does not allow for allowing work to be performed outside of the normal operating schedule. Proposing the to add the ability for two things:1. Project schedules to be built on the project itself. This would not require an Admin to create new schedules. This would be similar to an MS Project record....schedules are built into each file.2. Ability to define whether the Task/Issues follows the Project schedule or the Role, Team, User schedule.Why is this feature important to you -The current setup does not allow us to assign tasks to users and have the correct after hours dates stick. Having this new functionality would give the Project Managers the flexibility to create project schedules for each project without needing to coordinate with an Admin, and also allow them to control which schedule is used on tasks or issues.Additionally, changing the user's schedule to meet the project needs would adversely affect the user's resource capacity. How would you like the feature to work -1. Project schedules to be built on the project itself. This would not require an Admin to create new schedules. This would be similar to an MS Project record....schedules are built into each file.2. Ability to define whether the Task/Issues follows the Project schedule or the Role, Team, User schedule. By default, tasks/issues should follow the existing schedule priority: Role, Team, User, Project Current Behavior -Currently, the system uses User, Role, Team, or Project schedules (in that order) to determine task/issue assignment durations. As soon as a user is assigned to to a task, then their schedules takes priority.https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/workfront/using/administration-and-setup/set-up-wf/configure-timesheets-schedules/schedules-overview.html?lang=en
Description - For either New Home My Tasks or Priorities quick actions, users should be able to upload documents to a project object, not just a the task itself. Why is this feature important to you - Our team does not upload any documents to a task, so the quick action button is currently unusable and ineffective for users.Our creative team uploads their documents for proofing to project folders and not a task folder. My creatives want to be able to use this feature to save them time from clicking in the project to upload. How would you like the feature to work - Provide an option to allow documents to be uploaded to the project object from the quick action panel. It could be a toggle button that can say either "add documents to task" or "add documents to project". Then depending on the toggle option, folder(s) that are tied to the chosen object would populate to be able to upload files to. Current Behaviour - Currently able to upload documents directly to a tasks document (folders) area only. Does not exist to be able to upload to the project documents (folders) area.
Description - We'd like to be able to create a journal entry report to track what/when changes are made to a custom field without overwriting any previous information (every time a change is made). Why is this feature important to you - It's important we are able to accurately report every single time a user modifies a field in a report, so we are able to address each change when auditing. How would you like the feature to work - We'd like to be able to create a journal entry report based on a field in one of our project idea custom forms that will display each time that a user has updated the field along with the date/time the change was made without ever overwriting information that was there previously.Current Behavior - Currently, it appears we are only able to see the latest change/update made to the field. Whenever changes are made, the latest change overwrites all previous information. We'd like in the future for all updates to be reflected in the report without overwriting any previous changes that were made.
Hi there, In the new Priorities list/area, it would be great if the My Focus field could also be set by someone else aside from just the user viewing the table. For instance, if a Project Owner/Manager could mark a task or issue as "Urgent" and that choice would reflect on the work lists for the people assigned so they would know that is a high priority item. This would help with quicker and more accurate prioritization and work management. Thank you! Brittany LangThermo Fisher Scientific
Hi there, We would love to see the color coding on the new priorities view either go away entirely or change to something more impactful. Right now the color appears to align with a project, but there are often so many projects on the view that the colors get too similar and make it hard to identify anything with each color (or confusing users that items are from the same project because two colors are too similar). Our users are finding the project colors distracting and confusing. We would love to see the color coding equate to something impactful like the chosen My Focus option highlights projects as red if the corresponding task/request is marked urgent, orange if primary, etc. or maybe by proximity to the task/issue due date (red if past due, orange if due today, no color or yellow if not due yet, etc) just to name a few options. The main ask is for a hyperlink there, so if the color takes away from that, hyperlinks would be the #1 ask. Thank you! 🙂Brittany LangThermo Fisher Scientific
Description - We have had consistent user feedback over the years that creating and managing projects in Workfront is clunky, outdated (compared to other tools out there) and negatively impacts productivity. Much of this has to do with the UI. Users complain that there are too many clicks, too much leaving one record page to go to another, load times are slow when you have bigger projects and sometimes it will timeout or won't fully load, causing a lot of rework. Why is this feature important to you - modern UI's, such as Clickup or Monday.com, to name a few, allow for easy project creation and management with intuitive point-and-click actions. Quicker and easier creation and management of projects allows our project managers to focus on providing value to our clients and getting projects completed efficiently with clarity for all teams. How would you like the feature to work - take a look at Monday.com and Clickup. Users have also said updating a spreadsheet is easier when wanting to make quick changes to a project plan. If spreadsheet-like functionality could be incorporated I'm sure that would help.Intuitive user interface: interface is designed for ease of use, allowing users to quickly navigate and find necessary informationEnd user customization: allow users to tailor the project pages to their specific workflow and preferences (e.g. add their own custom fields and automations). This flexibility can significantly improve efficiency. Documentation: templatized project documents that can be edited and managed directly within a project (e.g. project briefs, business requirements document, etc.). Think Confluence functionality.
It would be great if one could upload a new version of a proof with a document all ready uploaded to Workfront. As of now this is not possible and new versions can only be uploaded from ones device
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provide the ability to specify the flags for RegExp in content fragment models for custom validation regex. This can be a mulit-select combobox offering the following flags: global insensitive multiline single line (dotall) unicode sticky (screenshot attached, add combobox under custom regex with these options, that would simplify the regex and enable new possibilities) Use-case: We have 2500+ clients that we serve using multi-tenancy. We are using content fragments and headless to deliver that content. We have contractual obligations with a major client that requires us to provide a completely white-labelled experience, from logos to copy. This means that there can be no mention of my company name anywhere in the content. Violations carry a $5M fine. Current/Experienced Behavior: Today, it is not possible to specify these flags, so handling things such as case sensitivity is unmanageable, and matching patterns across multiple lines is impossible. (screenshot attach of a hacky, unmanageable regex that only works on single lines) Improved/Expected Behavior: Adding this additional field, and reading it in the new RegExp constructor on the front end will provide the validation necessary to prevent content authors from accidentally creating a violation. (screenshot attached - add second argument toRegExp with flags) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 2024.9.17964.20240924T170544Z Customer-name/Organization name: United Health Group Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
If a user has the My Approvals widget set to only take up part of their Home screen or has their browser window size reduced, the issue/task and project name text is not readable. Many users would like to have their My Approvals widget set to only take up ½ of the Home page so that they can quickly see information in another widget next to it.It would be helpful if other items in the widget also adjusted when the widget is resized: remove the image, stack the Approval Stage text, stack the Approve and Reject buttons. This would allow more space for the issue/task and project name text when the window/widget size is reduced.
Description - For Adobe Target personalization and recommendation, there are use cases where we want to minimize KPIs like page load time, errors, agent contacts. It would be great to 1) set a reduction goal in Adobe Target, or 2) (less than ideal) be able to set negative outcomes in mbox attribute or prop/evars to enable optimizing towards zeroWhy is this feature important to you - We'd like to make more extensive use of Adobe Target Premium feature in digital self-service and show value reducing costs.How would you like the feature to work - You would select an Adobe Analytics metric to optimize, let say agent-assisted chats. In Adobe Analytics, the upward trend is set as "Bad (red)". In Adobe Target, we select select Agent-Assisted Chat as the primary metric and second drop down would appear: "Drive this metric: Up / down" with down preselected based on the analytics setting. ML models would then work to minimize the number of chats an agent need to handle by recommending the most helpful solutions.Current Behaviour -In Adobe Target, we select Agent-Assisted Chat as the primary metric. : "Drive this metric: Up / down" with down preselected based on the analytics setting. Since the ML models only maximize, the ML models would then work to increase the number of chats an agent would handle to take by recommending the least helpful solutions. OR we would need to find a proxy metric (highest rated support articles) that we would want to maximize that we believe causes less agent chats and then A/B test that relationship, but we may find articles that drives to chat preform high in article rating, but lower in issue resolution, time to resolution and overall customer satisfaction.
Descripción - As I mentioned in this question: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-target-questions/is-there-any-way-to-target-users-based-on-their-continent/td-p/699416#M11265, there is not an easy way to target users based on a whole continent.¿Por qué esta función es importante para usted? - We have global and regional users and clients, so we need to offer proper experiences based on their markets.¿Cómo le gustaría que funcionara la función? - Same dropdown than "Country/region", but having one just for "Continent". Or having all the continents included in the "Country/region" option.Comportamiento actual - Only a few continents available, but no waranties of working properly or in the same way between them.
Description - Add support for proofing SCORM files in Workfront Proof. Ideally; this would use the Workfront Proof application to deliver the SCORM presentation as a dynamic proof allowing individual pages and elements to be marked up and commented upon. Why is this feature important to you - It improves the process for creating customer training documents; improves the way we manage internal operations around creating SCORM files and improves the way we educate or train customers about our companies products and services. We create a significant amout of educational content at our business units that will be delivered to our customers in SCORM format that needs to be reviewed by Legal and RA in its final format prior to release. How would you like the feature to work - The same way as dynamic proofs for HTML pages but without needing to extract the SCORM file somewhere to host it first. Current Behaviour - SCORM files are not supported by Workfront Proof.
Description - I used to work for a software company who implemented a COTS solution with government agencies, and their software had date shortcuts. A user could enter '0' and the field would populate with today's date. Enter a '1' and it would populate tomorrows date. Enter a '-1' and it would populate yesterday's date. The field also accept '2w' (two weeks from now), '2m' (two months from now) and '2y' (two years from now) - these are just examples. A user could enter any number and any qualifier and it would populate correctlyWhy is this feature important to you - Equals less manual date entering. Less clicks = more productivityHow would you like the feature to work - Please see the description field above.Current Behaviour - A user has to enter at least a month and day, the system will populate the current year at least.
Description - Display the page name "Workload Balancer" or "Resource Manager" on browser tab when in the Resource Manager page.Why is this feature important to you - When multiple Workfront tabs are open, they all display the name of the page except for the Resource Manager tab, and I lose track of which tab is displaying the Workload Balancer. How would you like the feature to work - Display the page name "Workload Balancer | Adobe Workfront" or "Resource Manager | Adobe Workfront" on browser tab when in the Resource Manager page.Current Behaviour - It reads "Workfront | Adobe Workfront".
Marketo Measure currently supports the ability to use a custom revenue amount field, but it does not apply to Buyer Attribution Touchpoints (BAT). In order to do this, an automation in the CRM must be set up to duplicate data from the custom revenue field into the bizible2__Bizible_Opportunity_Amount__c. This is a poor design for the CRM to duplicate data and can affect performance in more mature systems. Since MM is already pulling this field for other areas of the system, could the integration be updated so that a custom automation in the CRM is no longer needed?
I have been told there are only 3 display options for the Proofing Menu Item. 1) Everyone sees it2) No-one sees it3) Only System Admins see it. These can only be set by Workfront Support. However, we would like to request the ability to control this in the Layout Templates along with other menu items.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Format the HTML removing return carriages and white spaces Use-case: Minimize page loading and file system cache disk usage Current/Experienced Behavior: The page loading is affected and more disk space is needed for the cache. Improved/Expected Behavior: Less disk size is needed and pages are faster Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): ALL the AEM, premise and cloud Customer-name/Organization name: This page is AEM based: view-source:https://www.miles-and-more.com/row/en.html This is NOT AEM based: view-source:https://www.iberia.com/ do your math... Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to Search for CQ Tags from the Tagging Console Use-case: 1. From the AEM Start page, navigate: Tools > Tagging.2. Attempt to search for a existing cq tag (using the title or description) Current/Experienced Behavior: The search results do not include (the expected) cq tags. Improved/Expected Behavior: The search functionality should return tags that match the provided keywords in the tag title or tag description. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.19 Customer-name/Organization name: Verizon Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description -Per Workfront Support > "For Kanban, tasks from "On Hold" projects typically remain visible on the board because Kanban focuses on continuous delivery and flow. However, for Scrum, tasks do disappear, as Scrum works in fixed sprints, and to maintain workflow, non-active tasks should not be displayed."The reasoning for the difference in functionality does not make sense. You can not focus on continuous delivery and flow is you cannot work on the card when a project is on hold. The system prevents you from updating the card, and rightly so. The Kanban board should not display work that cannot be worked on. Why is this feature important to you -The current behavior is confusing and keeps the board cluttered with work that cannot be worked on. Unlike the Scrum team where Tasks in an On Hold project drop off the backlog and sprints. How would you like the feature to work -The functionality should mimic the Scrum setup. If a project is on hold, then the cards should drop off the Kanban backlog or the board if already put on the board. Tasks that cannot be worked on should not show. Current Behaviour -If you have a card on your Kanban Board and the project is put On Hold, the card becomes stuck on your board. You cannot update the status, progress, or assignments because it the source project is on Hold.
Red Hat uses a variety of Kanban boards to manage work. Many of these boards have different statuses that are unique to each project.The following limitations prevent us from using Kanban boards at scale in Workfront.Cards cannot be moved out of the backlog without physically dragging them.We have projects with hundreds of stories in the backlog. Physically tracking down cards to move them forward after clicking into a card isn’t possible, especially when projects can contain many cards that end users are responsible for moving (see the appendix for details on one such process).We would simply like to be able to move cards out of the backlog from within the card, in the same way something can be moved from “New” to “In-progress” after it's out of the backlog.Kanban boards cannot be filtered, except by the user working on the card.Current tooling allows us to filter within any field and build advanced filters with if/and statements.Statuses can’t be readily customized by Kanban board, except within groups, which do not usually align to specific Kanban boards.This causes governance problems as — even within groups — there can be many boards with many different statuses.Ideally, we could create a custom field and use that for status within a Kanban board.
There is a great help article that shows you how to export a task list with the task hierarchy indented however when you do this you lose the hyperlink on the tasks. It would be great if we could do the export and retain the task hierarchy and the task hyperlink.
The External Lookup custom field should allow for OAuth JWT authentification. This feature is important, because of IT security guidelines.Currently, the external lookup field only allows for basic authentication via key-value pair
Apologies if this exists, but I cannot find it.It would great if you had the ability to link segments to other segments so that if Segment B is dependent on Segment A, and Segment A changes, Segment B would inherit the changes. See below for a use case in which I think this would be helpful.Use Case: Funnel AnalysisStep 1: I create the following sequential segments.1. Product Page2. Product Page > Cart Add3. Product Page > Cart Add > Cart4. Product Page > Cart Add > Cart > Checkout5. Product Page > Cart Add > Cart > Checkout > OrderStep 2: I create a report using these segments with the visits metrics to create a funnel.This works really well for me. The challenge I have is that I have 8000 + product categories on my site. If I want to look at the same funnel for our 'Electronics' category I have to do the following:Re-create each segment and add category logic:1. Product Page (Electronics Segment)2. Product Page (Electronics Segment) > Cart Add (Electronics Segment)3. Product Page (Electronics Segment) > Cart Add (Electronics Segment) > Cart (Electronics Segment)4. Product Page (Electronics Segment) > Cart Add (Electronics Segment) > Cart (Electronics Segment) > Checkout (Electronics Segment)5. Product Page (Electronics Segment) > Cart Add (Electronics Segment) > Cart (Electronics Segment) > Checkout (Electronics Segment) > Order (Electronics Segment)I cannot simply drop an Electronics Segment on Top because an Electronics product needs to exist at each step. A Hit of Visit Segment does not support this analysis. It will also be very time consuming to recreate this for every category. Thus, the ability to have dynamic or linked segments would make this much more efficient. What I propose:In my electronics example, wiithin each segment, the electronics portion of the segment would be a link to a dynamic segment. Within Analysis workspace (or other interface) I would be able to:1. Select a different segment to use on the fly. i.e. if I wanted to compare 2 different categories.2. Save the segment to be a hard coded segment. i.e. If the team responsible for electronics wanted to always have this segment for themseleves they could save it as there own with the configuration of their choosing.The above allows an end user to simply select the correct segment rather than recreating this multiple times for all categories. They could do this quickly by making configration dynamic.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
