Description: I have multiple apps that are all based on the same code and tracking, all of these apps send data to the same suite. When I have to do UAT, I am often switching between the apps so that I can test features in a logical order. It would be a lot easier to do this if I could use one AEP Assurance session for all of our apps. I would like to see a feature that would allow us to add multiple base URLs to a single sessions... similar to how we can connect multiple devices to a single session, I would also like to have multiple apps (and by extension, multiple devices running multiple apps) coming into one place for testing. Why is this feature important to you: Lots of organizations will have apps based on one code / one suite, being able to test them in parallel would save a lot of time. No more needing to set up individual sessions for each app, and having to load them in multiple tabs, and constantly flip between them. How would you like the feature to work: When creating a session, have the standard option, where at least one Base URL is required, but add an "Add" button, allowing you to continue adding additional Base URLs. Current Behaviour: Only a single Base URL can currently be added:
DescriptionA "new" version for "Transport Layer Security (TLS)" has been released in August 2018 already and Fusion is still not supporting it. The new version 1.3 is quicker and safer than the previous one (1.2). Why is this feature important to youThere are tools that require 1.3 to authenticate, which means that we can not use Fusion for automation. This leads to major disruptions in our workflows and makes Fusion unusable in certain use cases. How would you like the feature to workEnable support for TLS 1.3 for Fusion. It would be best if both versions (1.2 and 1.3) could be selected when using the HTTP module. Current BehaviourOnly TLS 1.2 supported, hence o automations via HTTP module to tools that require TLS 1.3 can be built.
Description -It would be great if Fusion would support TLS 1.3 for their HTTP module (at least).As per right now, only TLS 1.2 is supported - which is not enough to integrate between software solutions which are already using TLS 1.3.Whilst some of these applications can be enabled to support version 1.2, it surely is not always possible. This is very important to us, as this leads to Fusion simply being unusable for certain use cases All the best, Marius
We are looking for a much more user-friendly way to upload a bunch of issues. Kickstarts are good for initial data loads but not easy for a typical project manager to use in their projects. It'd be great if there was a menu item on the Issues tab that says "Upload Issues" and then allowed the user to select a document (XLS or CSV) to load. We have many instances where our teams will build lists of issues outside of Workfront because it is so slow to do so within the system. However, we require that they track their issues in Workfront. Right now, we have people spending hours manually entering issues from Excel into Workfront. On a related note, the upload should allow for updating existing entries in addition to creating new entries.
The ability to ‘pin’ user guides or user-specific information to the user's homepage would be great. With the recent developments Adobe have completed for us it would have been good to add guides for users to the homepage but I noticed that the pin function will only allow the pinning of Workfront objects, e.g. ‘Projects’, ‘Issues’ etc, and that specifically pinning documents, just pins the ‘Documents’ section of Workfront, where I believe pinning individual documents would be much more beneficial to users.
I would like to have the ability to add a document upload section as a field choice in a custom form, so I can add that functionality anywhere within the form, and also be able to add display & skip logic, as well as the option to make it a required field. Why? Because we have several project types that are being entered into the Workfront system, and for some of the larger projects, we want to make sure that a creative brief is attached, as well as make this field required for certain project types, while optional for others. ‚
On a recent Ultimate Success call I mentioned that I was concerned about the ease with which it is possible to delete or alter custom forms. This came of the back of Case Number 00425051 - Accidental deletion of custom form - undelete request, where I had accidentally deleted one of our teams custom forms. When custom forms are deleted we are required to contact support to get them undeleted, which seems like a step that could be avoided. As a result I would like to suggest one of the following: Confirm deletion pop up Ability to undelete from the system admin settings menu Custom forms having a ‘lock’ that requires and extra step to unlock I believe any of the above would have prevented me from deleting the custom form. In another incident recently a staff member with Admin access altered a custom form with an additional data requirement, which then resulted in all existing copies of that form no longer displaying data until the new data requirement had been met. This makes sense but it not immediately obvious, it would also be beneficial we had a way of saving custom forms so that experimentation can be done, although maybe its best that I ask changes are first made to the form in the preview environment to check compatibility. Finally, If a field is deleted from within a custom form it seems all historical data collected by that field is lost, it would be good to have a way of reverting changes etc if needed to avoid data loss.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: I have a suggestion that I believe would greatly enhance the user experience within the Assets Folder. My idea is to implement pagination within the Assets Folder UI, especially for users with a large number of files. Currently, scrolling through an extensive collection of assets can become cumbersome and time-consuming. With pagination, users can easily navigate through pages of assets, making it more efficient to find and manage their files. I believe that implementing pagination in the Assets Folder UI as a feature would be a valuable addition to the Adobe product suite and further enhance the overall user experience. Use-case: Manage files in Assets folder for better user experience Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, scrolling through an extensive collection of assets can become cumbersome and time-consuming for loading assets. Improved/Expected Behavior: With pagination, users can easily navigate through pages of assets, making it more efficient to find and manage their files. Also this would help in finding the total number of assets in folder. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hi I'd like to be able to sort the display order of my tags if I wish.Currently, I'm obliged to delete everything and recreate the tags one by one in the order I've chosen.This can be very cumbersome when there are a lot of tags. Ideally, there should be a button for sorting in ascending or descending order. With the possibility of moving (up/down or drag&drop) certain tags to make exceptions in order if I wish. Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Improved/Expected Behavior: Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable data collection using AEP Web SDK in China through China RDC (or a similar feature) Current/Experienced Behavior: China RDC only applies to Adobe Analytics using AppMeasurement data collection. Other Experience Cloud services and Web SDK data collection are not supported. Reference: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/core-services/interface/data-collection/rdc Improved/Expected Behavior: Enable China RDC support for data collection using AEP Web ; or a similar feature that will allow data collection in China Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): N/A Customer-name/Organization name: Accenture Screenshot (if applicable): N/A Code package (if applicable): N/A
Description: Enable China RDC support for Web SDK implementation. This is important to us as we want to continue the China tracking but data privacy regulations need the data to be passed to a China server first for all the tracking in the China site.Current Behavior: We are utilizing the China RDC together with the Adobe Analytics implementation. Right now, we are in progress with the migration effort to utilizing AEP Web SDK with an identified high risk for China site tracking.
Description:In our use case, we utilize the WebSDK and the Datastream for data collection. In addition to AEP, we also use Target, Analytics, and Event Forwarding as services. Our goal is to use IP obfuscation [full] and identical GEO lookup data across all services. Why is this feature important to you:For security and data governance reasons, it is important to us to configure these settings only once and not have to configure them additionally for each service. How would you like the feature to work:General settings and additional data determined in the datastream (IP obfuscation, geo lookup data) are extended in the payload/XDM, and all services use this data if available. The configurations that rely on previous integrations from AppMeasurement.js only apply if this data is not already present in the payload. Current Behaviour:Currently, and according to Adobe Support, we need to set the IP obfuscation in the datastream from "Full" to "Partial" so that the IP address reaches Adobe Analytics and another geo lookup can be performed. The geo lookup in the datastream and in the WebSDK configuration cannot be used to make geo information (country, state, city) available in the Analytics Workspace for analysis.This leads to the need to search for settings in the other services to ensure that no IP information or similar data is stored.
Description -Bynder offers a UCV (Universal Compact Viewer) that would allow users to seamlessly access content stored in Bynder without leaving the Workfront experience. We wish to enable this feature in Workfront as we build out our asset management capabilities through fusion this quarter. Why is this feature important to you - As we build out our 360 content experience with Workfront as the backbone, we need a way to provide a more integrated experience for our users working with assets stored in our Bynder DAM and reusing or editing these existing assets throughout Workfront templates. How would you like the feature to work - In document tab, include Bynder DAM as a library, similar to Sharepoint connector and have UCV pop upCurrent Behaviour - Not supported
A common (and serious) defect in lead scoring campaigns is when bots (not people) automatically click every link in an email. Whether it be for security, spam filters, etc., this happens frequently and makes lead scoring a moot point when people are getting credit for several link clicks they, in fact, did not make.Why couldn't marketo engineer something that recognizes when multiple links are opened within a second of each other? When this is recognized, cancel out the score change, interesting moment, and any metric triggered.It's pretty much impossible for a human to open 4 links in one second. And even if some freak does do this, we'd rather have this one outlier not counted instead of hundreds of leads with grossly inflated lead scores due to bots.This is just one idea on how, but really any fix to cancel out bot-generated activity is what we need.
It would be great if there was a way to archive old programs and portfolios that we are not currently using/doing business with. It would really help keep our system clean and accurate. We have so many old programs that it becomes messy. For example, we have "2015 incremental", "2015 retainer", "2015 investments", etc under one single portfolio. We no longer use the 2015 programs since we are in 2017 now. We still want to be able to see the history of these programs and clients and projects, just want a way to archive them or deactivate them. Would also be nice to have the ability to reactivate them if we need to use them again. Similar to how you can deactivate and reactivate an employee. Would be nice for Admin users to have the ability to "clean up" and audit our information in Workfront.
I would like to propose an enhancement to the API functionality for Smart Campaigns.Currently, while scheduling a Smart Campaign for "Run Once" or "Run Later" execution is supported via the API (as described in the documentation below), there does not appear to be a way to retrieve the scheduled execution date once it has been set:https://developer.adobe.com/marketo-apis/api/mapi/#operation/scheduleCampaignUsingPOSTHaving the ability to programmatically fetch the scheduled date would greatly enhance the usability of the API, allowing users to better monitor and manage campaign schedules, especially in automated workflows.I believe this feature would add significant value for users who rely on the API for streamlined campaign management.Thank you for considering this idea! I’m looking forward to any feedback or updates regarding this feature.
Description - Allow Resource Managers to update the Time Off Calendar for any team member in their group. Why is this feature important to you - Need to block user's calendars for upcoming work. Ideally it should be for a specific project, but sometimes the timing of the project task and when the time needs to be block don't always coincide.How would you like the feature to work - Resource Manager should have access to any member in their assigned group (even if not the reporting manager) to edit their Time Off Calendar.Current Behaviour - Currently, only reporting managers are allowed to edit the team member Time Off Calendar. We are currently using the Time Off Calendar to block the user's calendar, then removing it afterward so it doesn't reflect as time out.
We try to use the Updates section in Workfront in place of email. However, WF lacks functionality in two areas: text input & attachments. Text: there is no strikethrough ability (among others). This is good to have when discussing bodies of text to edit.Attachments: WF allows for picture file attachment, which is very handy. However, it doesn’t allow for Word file attachment. Yes, there are other places to load up files, but switching over to other pages & copying/pasting links is slower, and it adds up over time. Please consider adding these, as it's difficult enough to steer people away from email and into WF.
Workfront is very difficult to use for general planning if there are many job roles set up. This is always the case in large organisations. Finding the right job role is time consuming when the list is long. Most project managers start their project management activities using a role based plan as they do not know the actual team members. I would like to see the following: Ability to choose the list of role types that apply to the project - this may hence only be 10 - 15 roles.Project 'switch' to allow roles to be selected just from the project role list and not the overall company role list.When resource assignments are made the role types will then just be the small subset selected. Allow the user to select from this list rather than having to start typing the role name. This needs introducing asap as most users of Workfront in my company find the current approach very awkward tio use.
Description -With the ability to now toggle the sections of a custom form open or closed, we would like a button or something that allows us to change all sections to open without multiple clicks. We have a form with many sections and it would be easy to miss if someone collapsed a section. It would be nice to have the ability to open all at once. Current Behaviour - Currently can collapse each section separately, but no way to open them by one click.
When going to 'Profiles', please investigate an option of having the most recently modified profiles show in this view, for easy verifying of your data. Where today you'd need to search for a recently modified record
Enable as part of either the customizable table or the descriptions in the right menu the option of seeing the creator of a certain schema or dataset. A lot of cooks are sometimes in the kitchen, would be nice being able to backtrack this in the UI.
Couple of administrative ideas to enhance reporting prompts1. Add ability to use custom field labels instead of just the name or have an option to provide a custom prompt name for the report.Why? This would provide a much better user experience for fields where the label needed to be adjusted but the field name could not be changed (e.g. fusion integration). Additionally, this could support potentially better help text specifically when dealing with text search fields. 2. Ability to sort the prompts instead of deleting and reselecting the fields. Why? Administratively this would be more efficient with changes in reports and prompting that inevitably occurs.
Description - Excluding External Users from @ Commenting Feature Drop Down Why is this feature important to you - Commenting in WF is for internal users only. External users should not receive updates from Internal users in Workfront. We would like to remove the option to select them when using the @ comment feature. We do not want our clients to receive internal information. How would you like the feature to work - When using the @ comment feature in Commenting/Updates, we would like for only internal users to be included in the address book/drop down when you start typing their name. Current Behaviour - Right now when using the @ comment feature, if you start typing a users name, the address book includes both internal and external users. This leaves room for sending an update to external/clients by mistake. Which could cause clients to receive internal information that they should not be receiving.
Please add a notification option for Tasks / Issues I own, just like Projects I Own.The below options are helpful for a PM, but they fall short when it comes to request management. The commit date changes for a task on one of my projectsThe commit date changes for an issue on one of my projectsRequesters should have direct visibility to new proposed commit dates. Right now these updates are routed to the Project Owner which is often irrelevant for Request Queues. People requesting the work should be notified (or have the option to be notified) when someone proposes a new commit date. Right now our users have to manually create an update, type something and select the new commit date. It's a waste of time vs just updating the commit date.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
