Build better products with our product team
We don't worry about the time of due dates. We've always looked at end of the day as the deadline. Yes, sometimes we have to stay late to get it done on time. Now we have Workfront (in our 4th month) and the planned completion date has a time portion, which has cause some issues for us. Tracking On Time delivery, even 3 minutes past is considered late. We only worry about it going out on the date it was requested due. (We've worked around this with a custom field on a report, using the "cleartime" function, to get accurate reporting for our needs)We have two teams, one in Minnesota and one in Chile. We have a lot of issues with tasks and time off sliding up or down a day on the schedule because of the time zone difference. Makes for a scheduling nightmare! (we can work around this by setting every project and task due date to be ie. 5pm, but that's yet another tiny detail for our PM's to have to not forget) We'd rather not have to work around these issues. Could there be a global setting to "clear time" on all projects, tasks and issues?
機能改善要求（RFE）概要： We would like to be able to set the SameSite=None,Secure=Yes options for the saml_request_path (Cookie) configured in the "Adobe Granite SAML 2.0 Authentication Handler" ユースケース： I am performing SAML integration with the following configuration, but the value of saml_request_path (Cookie) cannot be obtained, so I am moved to the default destination after logging in. ・Uses "Adobe Granite SAML 2.0 Authentication Handler"・Configures two sets of Dispatcher-Publisher・Logs in on the IDP login screen after a period of time・Returns to the Dispatcher that did not send the request 現在／体験した動作： Cookies that do not specify the samesite attribute will become samesite=lax a few minutes after the cookie is generated.Therefore, saml_request_path (Cookie) created by another Dispacher cannot be read. 改善／期待される動作： Set SameSite=None Secure=Yes to always read saml_request_path (Cookie). 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： AEM6.5(SP19) 顧客名／組織名 TDEN スクリーンショット（ある場合） コードパッケージ（ある場合）
Description: It's pretty straightforward: Make it so the status field is editable on the My Requests widget. Why is this feature important to you: We are on a crusade to remove clicks wherever possible. Right now, if I want to change a request's status in the My Requests widget, I have to select the issue in question, open the preview pane, and then change the status there. These are two additional clicks, plus it feels like the widget is broken. (That was my first thought.) Although it's not The End Of The World if one has to use the preview pane, I anticipate getting support tickets from people who think the same way I did. How would you like the feature to work / Current Behaviour: See above.
Description - Please add ability to either multi-select report suites, or add a bulk import for adding them Why is this feature important to you - Managing classification sets across many report suites is a PITA when you have to do it one at a time. How would you like the feature to work - Change the current UI from single rsid dropdown to be multi-select, OR, add new text area option to copy/paste list to bulk import / fill in fields. Current Behaviour - Report Suites can only be selected one at a time
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to disable the Publish functionality on Assets View Use-case: When using AEM Assets with Dynamic Media with OpenAPIs, the 'Publish' functionality is not relevant anymore as assets are published by 'approving' the asset. Current/Experienced Behavior: In an architecture based on Assets View and Dynamic Media with OpenAPIs, users see a Publish option, which is not supposed to be used. The Publish prompts occurs upon asset upload, which is confusing for the users. Improved/Expected Behavior: Ideally, there should be a configuration option to enable or disable the Publish feature depending on the the architecture needs. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service - Assets View interface. Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description: Enable sharing of request drafts, which is currently not possible in Workfront.Importance: Requestors save drafts to gather missing information or discuss with managers. Sharing drafts allows for manager input before submission.Benefits:• Manager review and feedback.• Team collaboration.• Departments add missing details.• Comprehensive review by all parties.• Stakeholder feedback. Desired Functionality: Add a "Share draft" icon to share drafts with internal team members.Current Behavior: Workfront allows sharing request queue links for direct submissions, but drafts remain private until submitted.
DescriptionAlerts are a popular way to notify users that an anomaly or data issue has occurred. The alerts manager page allows users (and admins) to view which alerts have been created, including the expiration date and date modified, but does not show when the alert was last triggered or how many times it was triggered over the last 30 days. Why is this feature important to youKnowing how often an alert was triggered can let users (and admins) know if alerts are still useful, whether alerts may need definition changes, or whether an alert is happening so often that an underlying issue should be prioritized. How would you like the feature to workAdd a column for "Last Triggered" that will show the date-time for the last run (e.g. May 14, 2025 3:17 PM). Also, add a column showing the number of times the alert was triggered within the last 30 days. These columns could be toggled on/off. Current BehaviorNo information about when an alert was last triggered or how often it was triggered is available in the alert manager or the edit alert pages.
Description - There used to be functionality in an older version of Home to revert a task back to not working on it in what is now the My Work widget. Why is this feature important to you - Occasionally we need to backtrack the timeline to a previous task for an edit before creative can be reviewed again. However, if the reviewer hit working on it, the task still shows up in their work list since we currently have all users with working on and ready to start filters turned on.How would you like the feature to work - Have a "not working on it" button for the task to get it out of the work list when not ready for them to review. Current Behaviour - If a user hits work on it, the task remains in their work list even if the task is no longer ready for them due to the prior task being backtracked.
Currently if you need to make even the slightest tweak in a watch events filtering you have to delete the webhook and start again. It would be so much easier and save so much time, if we could instead edit the watch events setting like other Fusion modules
Description - After opening a support ticket, I've learned that only Sys Admins can create and activate new users with the new license structure. Users with Standard licenses can create new users, however any users they add to Workfront now require Admin approval to activate. Legacy Planner licenses did not have this extra step/limitation.Why is this feature important to you - We'd like the Standard license to have the ability to instantly activate a new user without requiring admin approval. This new limitation is adding an extra step to our workflow. It's resulting in delays as Standard users have to wait/remind admins to approve new users now. Additionally, the only work around is to make more people Sys Admins which is not ideal and it adds an additional risk.
Currently, multiple conditions seem to always take an "AND" operator- for anything "OR", I go to custom code. It would be very helpful to be able to use "OR" conditions.For instance, if I needed to have a condition like "if the pagename is 'home' OR the page type is "product details", I would have to resort to a custom code condition, or creating multiple rules.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - we've special char eg '-' in our organisation email id. i'm not able to add new user with email id containing the special char. How would you like the feature to work - to work as per current other email id without special charCurrent Behaviour - not able to add user.
Description - Do not make assigned tasks that are depended on predecessors visible Why is this feature important to you - Do no want to confuse assigned users if the tasks are not needed or ready to be worked on. But want to be able to assign the tasks in a task template so that it is a part of the task structure/workflow. How would you like the feature to work - We would like to assign a particular designer to tasks in a task template so that when a project is opened and the task template is attached, the tasks are pre-populated. If the tasks are not needed, the owner can delete the tasks, but if revisions are required, we want to make sure those tasks are assigned and made active once the preceding tasks are marked complete. Current Behaviour - All tasks with and without predecessors that are preassigned in the task template and used in a project are visible up in the designer's My Task and My Work lists.
Description - it would be nice if cohort tables displays same day (+0 days) returns. Why is this feature important to you - in our organisation, we like using cohort tables to see first-time email opens in a journey. In other words, email sends goes to inclusion criteria and first instance of email open goes to return criteria. Once the table is built, we can clearly see how long it takes to customers to open a email from a specific journey. This helps us to understand customer behaviour and works as a source to adjust journey steps. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to see +0 days (same day) as a column in the return criteria. Current Behaviour - currently, cohort tables columns starts from +1 Days
Description - Can we please get the right-click functionality for opening objects in new tabs back? Why is this feature important to you - It's nice to be able to open two windows at the same time How would you like the feature to work - Right click like how we used to have it Current Behaviour - It currently doesn't work and we have to use a work around that I have to explain to all new users with a CTRL +
Description - The limitation of 2,000 returns on the external look up field prevents us from being able to use master data for client names in WorkfrontWhy is this feature important to you - Using an external look up field to allow users to choose from a golden record for our client names would provide more robust reports in Workfront.How would you like the feature to work - We would like Adobe to increase this threshold as 2,000 returns is very limiting. A query search allowing more options would support our use of golden records for robust filtering.Current Behaviour - the look up field returns the first 2,000 lines only and ignores anything after that. Our master data platform can return up over 16,000 records in 1.8 seconds but they cannot be accessed beyond the first 2,000.
Description - Be able to set a character limit in single line text field or paragraph text field. Why is this feature important to you - We have certain assets that we can only have a certain number of characters when using the single line text field or paragraph text field option in the form. To be able to set the limit would be helpful. We currently use the instructions to let them know not to go over, but it's not always followed. How would you like the feature to work - When the system admin is creating the form, they would be able to change the character limit if they need to for single line text field or paragraph text field. Otherwise it would default to the standard if no limit is needed. Current Behaviour - There is no character limit on custom forms and having users follow the instructions is not always working.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently we are not able to configure external github repositories to a Configuration deployment pipelines. When we add non-adobe github repo, it throws error `An external repository is not yet supported for this type of pipeline.` Use-case: We were migrating from internal TFS repo to enterprise github repository. We to point other pipelines: Code Quality, FullStack, Front End pipelines to external Git. Just the configuration deployment pipeline alone is blocked. Sounds like temporary limitation, it is intentionally blocked. Current/Experienced Behavior: When changing repository to external non-adobe, it is throwing error Improved/Expected Behavior: Configuration pipeline should allow external non-adobe github repositories Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 2025.3.20133.20250325T063357Z Customer-name/Organization name: SouthernGlazers Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
It's can be so tedious to do a full clean up in Marketo when assets and fields are "used by." Marketo should introduce a more intelligent, guided deletion workflow for assets (like emails, forms, smart lists) and custom fields, even when they’re currently in use. The goal is to streamline the process and reduce the manual effort and risk associated with cleanup. Why This Matters:Fields and assets are often entangled across multiple campaigns, forms, and smart lists, making deletion tedious and risky.The current "Used By" view is limited and doesn’t always show full dependency chains, especially with nested assets or tokens.Custom fields are hard to deprecate fully. Even after clearing them from forms or flows, they remain blocked due to invisible references.Proposed Features:A “Smart Delete” tool that:Maps all dependencies (even nested ones) across the entire workspace.Offers options to replace or deactivate references in bulk.Includes a “safe delete preview” to assess the impact before confirming.Supports versioning or rollback in case something breaks.For fields: warns if the field is used in forms, filters, flows, or reports, and helps remove those references intelligently.
In the new Email Insights tool, my biggest complaint is with the Custom Dimensions and the fact that you can't change/delete them once they are created. I can see this being a major frustration for Marketo users, especially if certain use-cases change for what you want to report on. Another issue with having the restricted limits on the Custom Dimensions is not being able to test and adjust. The restrictions mean that users need to be more strategic about what Custom Dimensions will be used. I think there should be a way for Custom Dimensions to be deleted or changed.Do you agree?
Hi all,Yesterday I found myself working on a report and I needed to get the bounce rate for a specific country. I already setup the calculated metric to get bounce rate, but then I realized that no option to use calculated metrics on reports from the data warehouse.I think there´s no way to do this, so that´s my proposal to be included on the platform.
Can we add an option in the admin section where we can define the default fields of a forms, when a new form is created within that particular instance. Ex: Currently whenever we create a new form, we always get First Name, Last Name and Email. There should be an option in admin section where we can define some custom fields like UTM etc. as a default field available in the form whenever anyone creates a new form.
Description - At present my understanding is that we are only able to see collisions information in Target by opening each activity, this is very time consumingWhy is this feature important to you - We have many experiments running at the same time often using the same website pages.How would you like the feature to work - A collisions dashboard that would show all of the activities running on a specific page.Current Behaviour - Currently I can only see this information by seperately opening each activity.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Introduce a built-in visual debugging tool in AEM Author to detect and highlight failed ClientLibs loading (eg. 404s, category mismatches). Use-case: AEM pages often break in layout or functionality due to missing or incorrectly loaded ClientLibs, especially during template development or after dispatcher/CDN deployments. Authors and content editors face difficulties identifying these issues quickly without browser dev tools expertise. Current/Experienced Behavior: Missing ClientLibs result in broken layouts, JS errors, or missing styles/scripts - but no warnings are visible to non-technical users on the page itself. Only browser dev tools or logs reveal these issues, making root cause analysis slow. Improved/Expected Behavior: AEM should highlight missing ClientLibs visually on the page, or provide a debugging overlay or console warning for authors. This should include category mismatch detection, permission issues, and HTTP error codes for assets. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service; observed in multiple environments with Dispatcher/CDN caching layers. Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provide a restore functionality for Assets Console Use-case: As an editor, if I have accidentally deleted one asset from the Classic Assets Console (/aem/assets.html) in AEMaaCS or even a folder with hundreds of assets, I would like to have an easy way to restore the deleted item(s). Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, I have no chance to restore them. The only option is to do a "Restore content" via Cloud Manager, done by the admins which would restore the whole instance and with that changes, which have been done in the meantime, will be gone.I do not understand why a enterprise CMS does not offer such a basic functionality like a trash folder for asset! Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide a trash folder for the Asset Console were deleted items first end up after deletion. From there they could be restored. Of course some purge task should clean up here after a certain time which should be configurable.The new Assets UI has a trash functionality - but this works only for item which have been deleted using the same 😞 See screenshot Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
