Hello Workfront Team, My company noticed that comments within existing threads do not cause task Update threads to be bumped up to the list of Updates at the project level. It would be extremely helpful for the comment from the most recently updated thread to be bumped up to the top of project level updates rather than getting buried below. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks
Description - In workspace, when trying to send a report to an email address that doesn't have an Adobe account, if you don't hit "enter" after typing the email, it gives an error and doesn't let you send the file. This can be confusing for users who aren't familiar with the interface. By having more information appear when you hover over the warning icon, it can help users figure out what is going wrong and how to resolve the issue. Why is this feature important to you - This can increase ease of use for users. How would you like the feature to work - When you get an error, provide more information about what is causing the error and how to resolve it (such as hitting "enter" to validate the email address to send the report to) when you hover over the error icon. Current Behaviour - Currently you have to hit enter after typing an email, and if you don't it gives a red warning, but there is no information about the warning/information about how to resolve it.
Description - It appears that the way Adobe Analytics disables the alerts is to wipe the recipients list, re-enabling the alert means re-entering the list of recipients, can't work out if this is by design or a bug? Why is this feature important to you - I don't want to have to enter all the recipients again if I choose to enable a saved alert I've previously disabled How would you like the feature to work - Disabling the alert should suppress the alert without deleting the list of recipients, when I enable the alert I shouldn't have to do anything else. Current Behaviour - I have to re-enter recipients into my alert and save again
At the moment there is no way to see a list of all fields which are blocking updates from sources. You have to click into each field one by one to see if the field is blocking updates from sources. There should be an easy view where all fields that are blocking updates can be seen. Or when doing the export of fields include "Blocked Sources" as an extra column so we can do our own filtering in sheets
Users have suggested that there be a pop up that appears once you click done on a task to remind users to log a final sum of time.
Hi, I see we have a need to change when and how often a Journey is scheduled after it has been published. Insted of having to create a new journey just to change when journey is set to schedule, with all the impact it has to current profiles in the journey. I would like the possibility to change when and how often a published journey is scheduled. Example: from As soon as Possible to Daily at 10 PM, or from Weekly Mondays to Weekly Tuesdays A scheduled journey, is a published journey, so today to make a change to a scheduler I need to create a copy or a new journey version.
Somehow the ability to see unassigned issues got lost in moving from Scheduling to Workload balancer. Issues need assignments, planned hours, etc..... Please add this functionality
Description - In digital analytics, analyzing how long it takes users to complete an action, go through a funnel, or place a purchase is essential. Many optimization efforts focus on time-to-completion and many implementations try to make it accessible through frontend code. In Adobe Analytics, we can use the Cohort Table visualization to get a first idea of this. However, the smallest granularity is "day" and the resulting table is not very friendly to exploration: One of my personal favorite visualizations is the Histogram because it really helps during exploration, as it clearly shows in which bucket users fall and where to look next. Also, we can re-purpose the resulting Segments through showing the table: With this, I want to propose a combined visualization. Ideally, it would allow us to create a Histogram-style diagram from an input similar to the Cohort table. We would be able to select a "start event" and an "end event" (bonus points if we can select the first/last/every instance in a Sequence, Visit, or Visitor) and the granularity (from seconds to months) and bucket config, similar to the Histogram. Under the hood, again similar to the current Histogram, it would create Sequential Segments with "within" and "after" conditions and some clear names. The result can look something like this, showing a mock of seconds-to-completion of a checkout step:
When you create an ad-hoc task for yourself, it's added as a task to your personal project. However, when you go to that personal project, you cannot see your personal tasks unless you create a special filter to see them. The logic behind this is faulty because this is a task that I created and is priority for me to work on. So having it not show up, doesn't make sense. My recommendation is to un-hide those tasks so they display when you use the "All" task filter.
Requesting A4T Reporting for Auto Personalization WHY: Target reporting functionality driving additional work (compared to A4T reporting). Toggling between Metrics (Target only reports one KPI at a time). Exportable report format does not include Confidence levels. Copy/Paste of report table yields multiple values in one field and requires scubbing. Manually updating reporting end date (want Today-1day, like Analytics). Cannot compare to multiple Activities within one report view. Target reporting is rare skill-set within cross functional team and organization, where as Analytics is commonly used. Currently, we provide test reads to our cross functional partners by populating KPI's and their confidence levels into an Excel table. This data is pivoted and shared to a cross functional team in a comprehensive format.
The copy process takes over all elements in their latest version. This makes it complicated, e.g. to create the current production status, since in the copy all elements of which the last version is not in the production status must first be rolled back to the production status. The production library of the original property should also be copied.
Description Is there a way for Workfront to not be so strict with the hh:mm AM/PM format? Current Behaviour Currently, to input time, users need to completely type it in this format hh:mm AM/PM. Otherwise, Workfront will say it's an invalid time How would you like the feature to work - Example, the user wants to input 9:00PM or 9:00AM They should be able to do so just by simply entering in "9p" or "9a" in the time field. Once user hits Enter, the system formats it to hh:mm AM/PM Why is this feature important to you - 1) It will allow users to work faster and easier. Typing in "9:00AM" may not seem much but it definitely adds up, especially for those that work with TIME-specific deadlines more than DATE-specific deadlines. 2) Asana was able to do it. It shouldn't be a big problem for Workfront.
Texts data of several lines can be recorded to data field (of Text area type), but when we insert it to email with token, it's shown as 1 line. Data of several lines can be inserted to email only when it's sent by web form trigger and only in text type email. (I and Marketo Support tested it and confirmed the way it is) I hope that Marketo updates the system so that texts of several lines can be inserted email with token.
Description - On a single calendar, you can only add 15 filters/advanced filters and having the option to add more or have an unlimited number of filters would be beneficial. Why is this feature important to you - We base our calendars off of dates that are in our form(s) and also by reserved dates projects for dates that are reserved for emails, social posts, slots on websites, etc. Since we are limited on how many filters, we are having to look at doing multiple calendars, which isn't ideal. How would you like the feature to work - To up the number of filters that you can add to a calendar. Adding in 10-15 more color options, which would then add 10-15 more options to add more advanced items to a calendar. Current Behaviour - Currently you are limited to only adding 15 filter/advanced filters to a calendar.
This would allow a user to upload a document such as a PDF invoice to be linked to an expense helping to maintain accurate records, as well as allow Finance use expenses as legitimate places to start invoice payments. We will also use this as part of an integration with Open Invoice where the creation of an expense with a linked PDF will create an Open Invoice entry.
In some cases the option "export as portrait/ landscape" would be great! Especially the Page Summary Report looks awful if you do an export. Landscape export would be a great feature! Please promote!
Description - Need audit logs which gives details on when (timestamp) and how many times a profile entered journey and how the profile flows between the steps/conditions/events in the journey. Why is this feature important to you – To understand profiles flow in Live journey. Scenario : Expecting 100/100 profiles should receive email in a journey, but only 90/100 received ( Live report /global report gives a generic information of the journey results). How to know the exact 10 profiles which got dropped in the journey and what step caused the drop? How would you like the feature to work - Test mode gives log information. In the same way audit logs should be avialble for the journey for all profiles which are entering the journey. Current Behaviour – There is no logs available in live journey.
Description - We have integrated Adobe Target with our website using JSON offers. This works well for us and it is frustrating to find that we cannot use the same approach for Automated Personalization activities. Why is this feature important to you - We do not want the extra complexity of having to manage different types of activities in different ways. This is acting as a barrier to our company adopting the the Automated Personalization feature. How would you like the feature to work - Enable us to use JSON offers in Automated Personalization activities Current Behaviour - You cannot use JSON offers in Automated Personalization activities
Description - To have a general error setup mechanisn where we can setup the users who should be notified in case of error. Why is this feature important to you - We can create custom action/activity at every stage in AJO journey design. But, it will be repetitive 'in case of error' configuration setup at every step in a journey. There should be a general Admin setup available which notifies whenever there's an error. How would you like the feature to work - 1) Create an option in Administration - Error Management. 2) Provide option to setup users who should be notified in case of error in a journey or campaign 3) Trigger email notification when systems runs into error. 4) Can provide OOTB email template or user can configure it. Current Behaviour - Select option - 'In case of error' for each activity in a journey and define action to be taken. Thanks, Jyoti
We are an in house creative agency and we have a variety of print vendors. We give vendors requester accounts to facilitate proof delivery. They can deliver proofs into our system and we simply move them to the corresponding existing job in Workfront.What is unfortunate is not being able to hide "All Requests" from requesters. I don't understand the intention of this tab but the result for me, as an administrator, is that it's confusing and people have access to view requests that they should not see. In the Classic environment I'm able to move it to a tab, which is at least something. In the New Experience I'm not able to hide it.Why would I ever want requesters to have access to all requests?
On webapps, the storage activity does not allow you to exclude fields, by default it just updates all data submitted from the front end forms, the way to get around this is to use javascript on both front end (to assign field data to variables) then on back end to manually handle updating the fields you wish to have control over for. It would be very beneficial for an enhacement to be made to this activity, which allows the developer to uncheck fields to be excluded.
Description - Adobe Campaign Classic should be a open source and an easily available software for beginners to learn and implement what they are studying from the Adobe Solution Partner Portal. I tried various ways to get it installed for the hands on to clear the Business Practitioner Certification exam, but no luck as the questions asked are scenario based, you wont be able to crack them if you dont have the hands on to the software. Why is this feature important to you - This will help me and other users to download use and learn how the look and feel of the tool works.How would you like the feature to work - The software and other required applications to be downloaded from Adobe Website, a tutorial to be made to get it installed and then we can implement the trainings there and then while learning.Current Behaviour - N/A
Description - Allow Analytics to auto-provision read-only access to new users, similar to AEM. Why is this feature important to you - We're expanding our use of Analytics and have a large number of users interested in gaining access. How would you like the feature to work - The first time a user logs into the web UI via SSO, Analytics creates their account with read-only access so they can begin looking at the data. Current Behaviour - Analytics does not provide basic access so all new user requests have to be manually set up.
Description - Global change to the project owner field for *all* projects from one project owner to another project owner while someone is out of the office (or when someone has permanently left the team, etc.) with the ability to switch ownership of all projects to another project owner as needed (when someone returns from vacation or when a new employee transitions into a role, for example). Why is this feature important to you - Right now the workaround POs are using is to copy other POs on all tickets to give them visibility into the work which means out of control emails that are not helpful or useful 95% of the time. How would you like the feature to work - I'd like project owners to be able to flip a switch to assign projects they own to another project owner and we'd like the ability to turn it off when we don't need to assign projects to others. Any project owner should have the ability to do this for any other PO to account for someone leaving the team. The primary use case is project owner A is unexpectedly ill or out of town on vacation and assigns their workload to project owner B (or project owner B assigns project owner A's work to themselves). Another less common use case is project owner. A leaves the team or leaves the company and project owner B is hired and onboarded at which time all projects would be assigned to them. There might be a need to temporarily assign project owner A's work to another PO until project owner B is hired. Current Behaviour - The current workarounds we use include adding other POs to a project to have visibility across project owners just in case someone goes out of town.
A user with a Plan license should be able to have past projects show up in search results. Currently a user with a Plan license only receives projects that have been shared with them in their search results. When setting up a new project, a user with a Plan license needs to have access to all past projects to be able to reference those for new project setup and etc. All past projects should be available to a user with a Plan license and should show in search results for a user with a Plan license. Even if the user with a Plan license is not able to access the old projects, they should still show up in the search results so the user can then request access.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
