Would like to see outbound platform level webhooks - particularly when a program is created or when an Email program is scheduled
Description - Why is this feature important to you - Because currently, there is no way for an admin to manage these types of filters. Furthermore, no one, not even an admin can see other user's filters. How would you like the feature to work - Add a section in the Setup>Interface area for Balancer, Utilization, and Planner filters. Current Behaviour - There is no current behavior. Everyone's filters are completely siloed and unreachable.
Description - Currently if an issue form is inactivated in the set up the form still remains active on the queue topics of a project. This leads users to continue using that form and creating entries with that form that shouldn't be used. Why is this feature important to you - this creates a huge governance and system clean up issue. The form was deactivated for a reason, thus it should be not usable on projects if it is part of the queue topic! How would you like the feature to work - I open on this one, but ideally the user should get an error message when trying to create the issue saying this form is deactivated and contact a system administrator for a solution.
Currently, if a channel is hidden, its statuses are still selectable in program status picklists, which can lead to major bloating since all channel statuses are now shown in picklists instead of only the relevant channel. It would be nice if these statuses behaved the same way as archived lists - technically hidden from the dropdown but possible to populate by typing in the exact name (for historical reporting, etc).
Description - There is no way to report on the dates specified in user Schedules. Why is this feature important to you - It would be helpful to have proactive views of the dates identified in Schedules to support advanced, aggregate planned. For example, plotting Schedule dates in a calendar report would help cross-reference when news items should be published. How would you like the feature to work - Much like a Time Off report, allow a report or calendar to list dates in a Schedule. Current Behaviour - As discussed in this Question, workarounds are duplicative and labor-intensive. For any admin with more than a handful of Schedules, workarounds are likely not worth the work.
Description - Make the Boards functionality available for use in Sandbox so we can conduct better configuration testing. Boards is only available in Preview which means all testing must be built and complete in 5 business days before the environment refreshes. Why is this feature important to you - Would like the option to build out a new system configuration to better leverage Boards. We need the the ability to test over a longer period of time vs the time frame provided for us in Preview. How would you like the feature to work - same functionality as preview, just in Sandbox. Current Behaviour - No access to Boards in Sandbox, only preview and production.
Description - While we have the ability to adjust field sharing and access, we apparently can't report on it like we can with other objects. Why is this feature important to you - Reporting on object sharing is essential to system administration governance and maintenance, especially when conducting an operational change like reimagining how fields are managed. How would you like the feature to work - Similar to other objects (like custom forms), add a Shared with as a reportable field for custom fields. Current behaviour - To overcome the absence of a Shared with field, I have to click into each field—thousands of fields!—to view these settings.
Currently Matched Segments are only queried by Marketo RTP at the start of a visitor's session (lasts approximately 30 minutes) which means that visitor behaviour during that session, although changing the Matched Segments within Marketo, is not reflected in the way RTP behaves on the website in Real Time. A use case is semi-gated content where the content is only directly available if the visitor is known and subscribed to newsletters otherwise a subscription form is displayed. Currently, completion of the subscription form changes the Matched Segments but the visitor sees no change within the session.
Description - Since the latest release, there is a new "home" page for the Adobe Experience Platform Data Collection, this page has a section to help new people to the system, then a few sections for "Recent Properties" or "Recent Rules" etc.. While a "pretty page", for people like me that deal with many different properties every day, I just want to see the full list of properties.. the old behaviour of coming to the full list was actually a better experience for me. Why is this feature important to you - So, I understand the concept of the new home page for new users, or users who are only making changes to the same main properties all the time; this isn't the best experience for all users.... I would like the option to set the "Tags" area (the full list of properties) as my landing page to save me time getting to where I need to be. How would you like the feature to work - There should be a settings or preferences page in the interface that allows users to choose where to land... this could include options like the "Home" page, as it currently works, the "Tags" page (which would be the equivalent of the old behaviour), and for those that only work primarily in a single property, allow them to land directly in the chosen property. Choosing a landing page exists in Adobe Analytics, where you can choose to land in the main Workspace list, or in a specific workspace (and back when it was relevant, you could also land in the old Reports area). This is a really handy feature that allows us to maximize our workflow. Current Behaviour - User lands on the new Home page, which has a lot of extra stuff that experienced user won't need at the top of the page, but also reduces what properties they have immediate access to. This means one more page load and click to get to where you need to be... while one extra step doesn't seem like a lot, it adds up over time...
Description - Currently, the filter/view/grouping cannot be rearranged, and they show in an alphabetical order in reports or for example in project view from main menu. Why is this feature important to you - Because we want them in a particular order, all the status filters at one place, owned by filters at one place etc. How would you like the feature to work - Instead, allow admins to rearrange the order and same should reflect in reports. Current Behaviour - Fixed in LT and in alphabetical sort on reports.
Description - Number of Updates displayed on main navigation area Why is this feature important to you - I could see at a quick glance if there have been some conversations happening before going into the updates section. How would you like the feature to work - We think it would be helpful if the number quantity of updates in a project displayed a number like the number of documents in a project Current Behaviour - Currently we go into updates to read them, and we would still do that. This would help identify if there has been conversation happening at a quick glance from the main view.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - this would be great to down a custom form without creating a report to do so in some cases. In one instance I created a form to be used with some of our printers. It is now being used currently and now they need to go to the reports and pull pull from it. How would you like the feature to work - I would love to have the option to download as a pdf or excel sheet and also landscape or portrait to fit content on a page. This would be less click by users and staying with the Project Current Behaviour - I've created a report to pull the info down. Downloading as is created multiple pages
Description - Bulk-editing tasks does not handle disparate custom forms well. If 2 or more selected tasks have different custom forms, instead of showing the union of the custom forms across the tasks, it doesn't show any of the disparate tasks. On top of that, you cannot remove or edit custom forms in bulk if the same custom forms are not on all the tasks. The better approach is to show the custom forms that exist on all of the tasks, and only apply the changes to the tasks that have the edited custom form. Showing all of the attached custom forms also allows for removal of the custom form on those tasks that have it assigned. Why is this feature important to you - It is impossible to bulk-remove custom forms that are not on all of the selected tasks. It is impossible to bulk-edit any field on a custom form that is not assigned to a task in the selection. How would you like the feature to work - Instead of excluding the custom form because it is not on all selected tasks, show the custom form and only apply the changes to those selected task that are relevant. Current Behaviour - Custom forms that are not on all selected tasks are not shown and are not listed to be able to remove them. Users must find and select only the tasks that have the custom form to be removed or bulk-edited.
As an integration developer, I would like to use calls to the "Browse" endpoints of Marketo's assets more effectively. For example, the following API calls have two optional parameters, earliestUpdatedAt and latestUpdatedAt: /rest/asset/v1/emails.json /rest/asset/v1/programs.json /rest/asset/v1/smartCampaigns.json /rest/asset/v1/staticLists.json This is incredibly useful when trying to manage large-volume instances, as you can constrain to ongoing behavior. However, this ability to filter is missing from several other asset calls, despite them being similar in nature and reporting updatedAt details when called: /rest/asset/v1/channels.json /rest/asset/v1/folders.json /rest/asset/v1/forms.json Would it be possible to get these two parameters added for these three specific calls? There's likely merit in adding them elsewhere (e.g., snippets.json) but I'm only looking specifically for these three.
Hello, as far as I could experience it, when you have a long form, it's quite difficult to find a field already set up (= right-hand side) and it is also quite "difficult" to move a field up or down with the drag and drop logic. It would be good to have a search field and some up and down buttons or a compact view to organize quicker all the fields. Kind regards Sébastien
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.