Workfront has great capabilities for inputing and tracking expenses but is very lacking currently when it comes to estimates. I'd like to see the capability to keep track of estimates and export estimate signoff documents in the system without having to do a massive amount of custom configuring and Fusion workflows. Why is this feature important to you: It's important for us to keep track of estimates, not just expenses, so we have the ability to reconcile the expenses with the estimates. We also require signoff for our estimates do a formal document is beneficial. Currently much of this is happening outside of Workfront through emails and manual calculations. It would be extremely beneficial for this be handled within Workfront so everything stays with the project and calculations are not being done manually. How would you like the feature to work: A specific use case is as follows. Production Manager is tasked with getting an estimate for some premium items Production Manager gets several options and per piece costs for each Production Manager is able to enter several quantities in for each item and the system calculates the total for each quantity based on the per piece cost. A formal estimate document can be exported and saved to documents folder to be sent to client for signoff. When estimate is signed off on the Production Manager is then able to finalize the details for an expense and reconcile the expense against the estimate. Current Behaviour: Currently Workfront is set up to handle expenses. If there are multiple quantities being estimated each quantity is entered as a separate expense which is a lot of extra manual work. Also if we have per piece costs we are manually calculating those costs which leaves greater room for error. Also, there is no mechanism currently for exporting a formal estimate document from the expense. We were able to build something using Fusion but its not an ideal fix.
The ability for end users to select "Ignore/Consider User Time Off" for task durations in projects can lead to unintended consequences if project owners don't fully understand what that field does. For companies where due dates can not be moved because a team member takes PTO, it is important that we are able to proactively set project options without having to build exception reports to find and fix these issues. If admins could hide that field via layout templates, that would go a long way to consistent project management across our company.
Description The chart visualization ignores applied filters. Selecting the sparkline as the data source always shows all data for the respective dimension. Selecting one metric as a data source shows the first attribute of the dimension for all metrics. Warum ist Ihnen dieses Feature wichtig In practice: it makes it hard to find out, at what point in history a dimension starts being populated. Imagine you implement the dimension somewhen in last year and need to find out, when it was. You create a table/chart for the last year. But what you see is traffic for this dimension for the whole year. Also the chart gives a wrong picture of the data, if you apply filters to your dimension. It's just a bigger representation of the sparkline, which always shows the history of all data, including datapoints, where there is no actual data ("unspecified"). If I select one metric as a data source, the chart will show all metrics and the first dimension attribute only. This seems to be counter intuitive. Wie soll das Feature funktionieren: It should be possible to get the history of the selected data considering applied filters. If not by a single click, but by an option that says "show actual" data. If I select one metric as a data source, I'd like to see the data for this metric only. Either of them should allow me to see the actual historical data for the selected dimension and metric. Aktuelles Verhalten If you create a line chart based on a table and select the sparkline cell as the data source, the line chart will show the data from the sparkline. It will not change even if you apply a filter to the dimension. Reproduce: 1. create a Workspaces > Project > Table with rows showing a dimension, columns showing a metric (e.g. Occurences, Page Views, Visit) 2. make sure, that "show unspecified" is enabled 3. create a line chart for this table, select one cell containing a sparkline to make this the data source. The chart shows one line representing the sum of all dimension attributes 4.disable the option "show unspecified" The chart will reload, but it will be the same as before. 5. select three attributes of your dimension and choose "display selected rows only" from the contextual menu Again, the chart will reload, but it will be the same as before. 6. select the actual metric (the green cell) as the data source Again, the chart will reload, but now it will show ALL metrics, but only the first attribute of the dimension
There is currently no option with a channel surface or email template to prevent additional channel surface applied URL parameters from being included in external domain based links. For instance, we may wish to only have the additional automated parameters to be included with sender address based links and not externally facing links such as facebook.com.
Description - When a task is dependent on a predecessor (either same project or cross-project), and it impacts my assigned task, I would like to get a notification of this event. Currently, there's no way to get notified of a change in completion date due to a predecessor. This forces me to review all of my chained tasks for date impact. There is notification if my task itself gets its completion updated directly, but not if it's updated by a dependent task indirectly. Why is this feature important to you - This is important because a dependent task has affected my task's planned due date. Without notification for this, I have to monitor for these changes continuously. How would you like the feature to work - When a task that is assigned to me has its planned completion date changed, I want an event notification. It should not be limited to just users changing the planned completion date directly. Current Behaviour - There is no notification of an indirect date impact on assigned tasks.
Description - When an issue is added to a project, an update should be made to the Updates tab so folks know there are some issues reported. The Issues label or number of issues should be in Red so they stand out. Users are not noticing the issues.
We need a way for admins to be able to see all email notifications that were sent per object. As an admin, I get several questions about email notifications and need to know what emails were sent on a certain project, issue, etc. There should be a new tab in each object that shows an audit log of every email notification that was sent regarding the object. This would function similar to the Updates tab so any notifications sent regarding tasks, documents, or issues on a project would also roll up to the email notification tab on the project. This report would contain the following:-subject of email-sent to-email notification type-date sent-body of email
Stemming from my initial question here, which had a bit of discussion: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/in-workspace-can-i-change-default-settings-for-freeform-tables/m-p/546895 Description: In Workspace, whenever I build a freeform table, the default options are things like (show as sum of rows and background with bar chart.) The ability to set other options as my default values would save a lot of time. Why is this feature important to you: For the last five years, my team of 10 and I, have been working with very large data sets in Adobe Analytics. The time it takes to build a freeform table could be cut in half if default settings were able to be changed. Recently, I built a very common table for our work, drilling down by 10+ segments, each broken down by additional segments/dimensions, and seven metrics columns. 90% of the time we set each drilldown to "show grand total" and uncheck "background" for each metric. For this one table, that means changing 17 settings, which adds a ton of time, especially when most of our analysis is previous 12 months. How would you like the feature to work: It could be as simple as adding new options to the Components>>Preferences, but even better would have a checkbox in the settings window, that said "Set as Default." Current Behaviour: I need to change settings in every drilldown and metric.
The new alert component is a wonderful and powerful tool when it comes to defining alerts for very specific segments and metrics.Though it is still very inflexible in terms of time to trigger the alert. I'll explain the use case: Every night we've got a process to classify the a spefic custom variable X in classification XY via FTP upload, which takes a couple of hours and the classified values are usually available after 7am. Though from time to time this process takes longer than usual (1-2 days) and there are values missing in reports. Sometimes it's obvious for the users, sometimes not, and I'd like to alert them, if this is the case.So I decided to setup alerts with a segment "custom var X exists and classification XY doesn't exist". The problem I am having is that the alerts are triggered straight after midnight, before the classification can take place.If the time to trigger alerts could be chosen, it would solve my issue
Currently time granularity can be set to hourly, daily, weekly, monthly.Idea: Please allow custom time granularities: e.g. last hour, last 6 hours, last 12 hours, last 48 hours, etc.
Description - Why is this feature important to you -It is important because it aides the ability to break up forms. (Competitors, are blowing you away because your form builder is too basic) Smartsheets, MSforms etc. How would you like the feature to work -Just give users the ability to add colors or line breaks that have colors or font enlargements etc. Current Behaviour -You do have section break fields but they are still flat.
Hi all, I was doing some testing and noticed that completed approval processes on Issues get deleted after they are converted to projects. This is not ideal from an audit standpoint since you cannot report on who approved it before conversion. We would like the issue to retain the approval process and all the data associated with it.
Description - Instead of free form, have the option to include certain offer templates to be added to library Why is this feature important to you - It would cut down on copy paste issues and non-standard offers responses How would you like the feature to work - Have an option to create from template when hitting the plus button Current Behaviour - JSON or HTML but then it is free form.
Description: Below are some enhancements could really boost the usefulness of the Adobe Workfront plugin. When looking at proof comments, could there be a thumbnail image of the page showing the type of markup and where it was marked on the proof? So you could see an arrow pointing to part of the page, or the rectangle, or where text was selected. Right now, being able to view proof comments isn't useful since there is no context as to where that comment is within the document. In proof comments, if someone attaches a link, could there be a hyperlink to view or download their attachment? Right now, no attachments show. When creating a proof, the ability to add reviewers (or other proof types) instead of only approvers. Could their be a notification icon that reflects the notification icon in Workfront? It would be great if we could adjust task assignments, project owners, or project status directly from the plugin. Why is this feature important to you: I think this plugin has a lot of potential, but there are some key features missing that currently limit its effectiveness for our team.
Email Open Activity in the rest API is missing the client ip address. The Ip is included for the event type Visit Web Page, though. It would be nice to see all information available to the frontend be included for all activity calls on via the rest api - for sanity and consistency.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - many choices don't lend themselves to short answers How would you like the feature to work - choice would show in its entirety Current Behaviour - Choice is truncated and ellipses appear
There are two ‘Documents’ places that we use to save documents on Workfront: Project and Task Saving files in Task – Documents: In our project team, people get assigned to subtasks in tasks. It's easier for the team to go and see what the relevant files are within Task-Documents. However, when we save files and create subfolders in Task-Documents, the related “Project” Documents don’t have the same folder structure that’s in Task. For example, if we save files A, B, C and organize the files in subfolders in Task, then when we go to its Project, files A, B, C are just saved in Project Documents as loose files, not in any subfolders. We have a lot of different tasks in one project, and it makes difficult to know which files are for which tasks unless someone goes into Project Documents and create subfolders and organize files manually. Or people need to go different tasks and try to find the files they need. Often times we have multiple tasks for one work item (i.e., one task for creating website content, another task for content edit/approval, and another task for website build/production, etc.). Either way, I don’t find this is efficient. If we save files in Project – Documents: people go into Workfront and see the subtasks they are assigned to, then they have to get out of the Task and go one level up to find files from Project – Documents. I am not sure if this is ideal either. My goal here is that we save files to Task Documents, then when we go to Project Documents, we can filter the files based on the tasks related to the files. I played around with filter/grouping in WF and I could figure out how to group based on tasks, but document list with tasks looks too busy; I can’t figure out the best way for this. I feel like there must be a way to organize documents in Project without manually creating subfolders. I want to make sure that we have organized folder structure for each project/work so that when we try to find something even years later we can still go in and find what we need, and people know where to look. Ideally, even someone who didn’t get involved with the project, they should be able to find the files when they try to achieve it. Please let me know what you think. Thanks! Sunny Waterman
Description - Include any Images placed inside a custom form when exporting form as a PDF from a Project/Task/Request. We quote design work for Retail customers. I would like to be able to insert a barcode image within a Custom Form created to be used as a Printable Quote sheet for the customer. This barcode can then be scanned at the time the customer pays. Current Behaviour - When exporting PDFs of Custom Forms the images are not included and the field is shown as blank.
Description - Currently, our users are unable to edit story or element/issue card details from the backlog column that displays on a Kanban board. Why is this feature important to you - It would make sense to be able to allow someone to edit the same information directly from the Kanban board without needing to go into the backlog separately. It helps create some efficiency. How would you like the feature to work - Allow users to edit the card details directly on the Kanban board (when it's in the backlog column). Current Behaviour - The users are able to edit the card details from the backlog (when you navigate to it from the left-hand column), however, when viewing from the board itself, they are unable to do so. They are able to edit the information from all other swim lanes/columns except for the backlog column.
Description - Update Resourcing Tool under Planner and Workload Balancer for better visibility of hours comparison on a daily basis and by individuals. Why is this feature important to you - Want to see total planned for Unassigned and Assigned tasks in Workload Balancer for resource forecasting & planning. Want to see Daily View on Planner for resource planning by day. Resource managers need the ability to see the difference between total planned hours for the day and total available hours for the day. Adding either a sum line on the Workload Balancer or a Daily view on the Planner would give resource managers that ability for hours comparison. How would you like the feature to work - Add a daily column option to the Week/Month/Quarter options on the Planner. Add a line that sums together planned hours at the top of Unassigned Tasks and at the top of Assigned Tasks in the Workload Balancer view. Current Behaviour - Planner only shows Week/Month/Quarter options. Workload Balancer only shows hours by individual task or user.
Would be AMAZING if Marketo could include a heatmap for email click performance. Being able to see the literal email body itself with click data on the specific locations of the links that have been clicked would be such a fantastic feature. Our team creates this manually each month with our newsletters and it's always rather time-consuming. Thank you!
Description – Adding Project filters to the Home area so items associated with projects in “Planning” can be toggled on and off. Why is this feature important to you – This is important to me because it will allow greater control over relevant information on the Home area. There can be late tasks on projects in Planning that clutter the Work List section. How would you like the feature to work – Add a “Projects” filter with statuses you can toggle on and off as needed. Current Behavior – The Work List on the Home area contains items for projects in Planning and In Progress.
Description – Adding custom views to Timesheets that will allow specific task details, such as the task planned completion date, to be viewed quickly without having to select and navigate the “Open Summary” section. Why is this feature important to you – This is important to me because it will reduce the time needed to identify the correct task to add time to among similarly named tasks. Examples of where this could be helpful are recurring tasks and identically named child tasks on projects. How would you like the feature to work – Add custom view options to Timesheets, similar to other areas in Workfront such as Projects, Programs, and Portfolios. Current Behavior – You must select Open Summary to see task differentiating details like the task planned completion date and other key fields.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: CSV Import Tool which perfom Publish, unpublish, delete, Move actions on given paths in csv Use-case: Generally in any project we have multiple nodes [Pages, Assets, Renditions...] that need to be Publish/Unpublish/Delete, and example n number of nodes are not in use and cause huge impact on environment performance and we need to unpublish those and then delete it, it could be n number of assets, pages [which used for testing or duplicates etc]. and let say the number could be in 1000+. so in that case we have to write groovy script, servlet, scheduler or worflow etc, to read the path of nodes from particular CSV and do operation like publish, unpublish, and delete using replicator API or in anyway. and writing this code need lot of optimization based on environment behaviour [e.g : making it sync or async]. Instead of this approach if we could have a generic solution where the product have a CSV importer tool which will read the path of nodes from CSV and perform actions like delete, unpulish, publish. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently I have 30,000+ Assets which are duplicate, and the path of those assets are stored into a CSV file by the QA, Stakeholder team and I need to remove those incluing their properties which holds their renditions path since it is duplicate, before deleting I need to unpublish those nodes. Improved/Expected Behavior: a tool which which read the path of nodes from CSV and perfom actions like Publiish, Unpublish and Delete. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM6.5 and above. Customer-name/Organization name: Generic Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): reference post : https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/aem6-5-unpublish-and-removing-bulk-assets-using-path-from-csv/m-p/562255#M139958https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/aem6-5-servlet-to-unpublish-and-removing-bulk-assets-using-path/td-p/562621https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/aem6-5-read-multiple-properties-from-a-node-and-perform-action/td-p/564264
Description - I would like users to be able to @mention someone when they make a comment in the Approve, Changes, or Reject comment boxes. Why is this feature important to you - This would ensure the comments from the user are seen right away and by the correct person/people. How would you like the feature to work - When typing in the Comments boxes from the Approve, Changes, or Reject section, someone would include an @mention to a person or team and that message would generate an email update to the person/team @mentioned. The update would be connected to the document (like it is when a Comment is made in the Document Summary Updates section along with showing the decision made. Current Behaviour - Users have to navigate to the main Updates page to make comments which requires multiple extra clicks around the Project.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
