Currently MSI is not supported on the new Unified Interface of Microsoft Dynamics. I'd love this functionality to get added to the product road map so our sales and marketing teams can leverage MSI in our CRM.
Description - We are now using a custom priority field that requesters fill out when submitting a help desk ticket to help us better prioritize tickets, but on the event notification email that's sent to our admin team there is no option to replace the native "Request Priority" field with our custom field. Therefore, we have to either open each ticket and view the request details to find the priority OR visit our help desk dashboard to find the priority. Since we receive many help desk tickets, it reduces efficiency and adds time to properly assess each ticket's priority by having to manually check each one. If we could see our custom priority field in the event notification email, without leaving Outlook, it would increase efficiency and help us focus and prioritize tickets. Why is this feature important to you - The above is just one use case that would increase team efficiency and allow us to better respond/mange our urgent help desk tickets. We also have other business stakeholders asking to customize their event notifications (without having to create custom notifications) so there are multiple uses for this. How would you like the feature to work - Have the ability to edit more than just the subject line of the event notification. Current Behaviour - Can only edit the subject line in the event notification.
Issue: The Adobe Experience Platform Web SDK extension with the Redirect with Identity Action Type changes the original behavior of the link click. For example, if your link was supposed to open in a new tab, the current Adobe code will open the destination link directly in the current window, which impact the user experience, not great at all! Solution: Adobe should offer to their clients the choice of how the Adobe Experience Platform Web SDK extension with the Redirect with Identity Action Type should behave. Such as Google Tag Manager where we have several options: AutoLink Domains: Once all domains are defined by default GTM will append a query string to the destination URL (instead of opening the link directly in the current window) Use Hash as Delimiter (optional): If we want to track the google id as an hash tag ‘#’ instead of query string. Decorate Forms (optional): If we have a form which migrates the user to other sites, on submitting. This field should be set to TRUE.
Description - Currently, Boards cannot dynamically intake personal tasks. I would like to see Board be able to dynamically intake personal tasks. Why is this feature important to you - One of the most natural and useful applications of Board, in my opinion, is for making a personal to-do list. In Workfront, I use personal tasks to do this. I want to keep all of these tasks together as personal tasks because that is how I have already been organizing myself for some time. Personal tasks technically live in a hidden project in Worfront, but that project is hidden from searches. Probably for that reason, Dynamic Intake in boards is unable to find any of these tasks or that project, even when I specifically filter for them. How would you like the feature to work - I should be able to use Dynamic Intake to search for and populate a list of tasks, including personal tasks. If Workfront wants to keep these tasks hidden by default, then they should make it possible to specifically add a filter condition to look for personal tasks by searching for a match in the ProjectID or something like that so that it is not impossible to dynamically intake personal tasks. Current Behaviour - Currently, when you filter for tasks with Dynamic Intake on boards, personal tasks do not populate in the list. Even if you, for example, specifically filter for the ProjectID containing your personal tasks, Boards is unable to find them.
When a user removes a custom form from an issue or any other object, the system updates area does not keep an audit trail letting us know that a custom form was removed. Need a way to know when a custom form was removed from a record and by whom regardless of the object.Thank you!
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Adobe's own Payment gateway for seamless integartion with applications via simple API calls. Use-case: Payments in any payment related applications. Current/Experienced Behavior: 3rd party integartion, white label payment gateway Improved/Expected Behavior: Use of APIs provided by Adobe to directly connect to payment gateways and get response seemslessly without redirecting to 3rd party pages within AEM. Create own payment experience. Additional add-on to AEM. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description Ability to transform redirects based on the session and visitors attributes. Why is this feature important to you Sometimes we need to write javascript to customize redirects beyond what is availability in the redirect offer. E.g. converting a querystring into path or changing a querystring attribute name. Javascript based redirects are not officially supported, they are slower and can cause SRM errors How would you like the feature to work Take the incoming URL as an input string write JavaScript and/or Velocity to make transformations to the the string, including inserting session and profile attribute values Output the transformation as the output string Validate the output string is a valid URL Apply standard Adobe Target redirect offer transformation (i.e., add referrer, session id, etc) Send output string as redirect back to the browser Current Behaviour Static URLs with option to pass the original querystring and mbox session ID
DescriptionInclude Target Type and Experience ID on the Overview tab of the Activity details page Why is this feature important to youEasier access to this information when we analyzing experiments in our data warehouse or via an API How would you like the feature to work In the "Info" section include Target Type In the "Experiences" section, include helper text with the Experience ID. Current Behaviour Only Activity ID is displayed in the "Info" section
Description Create a third offer type "GitHub Offers" within the Offers library. I'm mostly describing offers here, but a similar method would work for profile scripts. Why is this feature important to you This would help us to follow development best practices and automate some of the work flow. How would you like the feature to work GitHub would automatically pull folders, .html, .json documents into the Adobe Target library. Ideally, it would be great of it would support multiple branches with the option for that brand to behavior differently with Adobe Target, e.g.: Prod Branch: .html and .json documents would act life Remote Cached offers. Normal cached offers rules would apply Staging Branch: .html and .json documents would act life Remote Dynamic offers. Dev Branch: etc.... In an activity, you could note the branch and offer name so you could easily switch between branches. You could also fix to a version of the code, so that unexpected updates don't disrupt production or use the latest (default). Current Behaviour - N/A
Given Target's capability is similar to that of a TMS such as Adobe Launch (i.e. the ability to inject code into a website) I have always been surprised by the comparative lack of control over workflow/roles/permissions.Given Adobe has recognized the need to up it's game in this space from an Adobe Launch perspective, please can you consider mirroring this approach for Target?As it stands it is difficult to separate out responsibilities in a meaningful way given the limit roles and comparative lack of workflow. Our organisation is risk averse and although we have put other controls in place I fear this may have the potential to limit our ability to use Adobe Target in the future if this is not addressed.
Description - An Adobe Target role where users can view activities, but cannot create or edit them. However, the unlike the Publisher role, this one would only have the additional permission to deactivate/pause/stop activities.Why is this feature important to you - I work with many brands that are not often Adobe Target savvy but should still have control over their own websites if they hear about a major change to a marketing campaign before I do, I'd like to have them be able to deactivate/pause/stop that activity. I do not want them to be able to edit live activities or push new activities live as they won't QA and may break things.How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to assign users the permission to only deactivate/pause/stop activities within the admin console.Current Behaviour - If a user has the power to deactivate/pause/stop an activity, they also have the power to activate an activity which can be much more harmful than the former.
Description - Looking for the system to allow "copy and submit" items to be saved as drafts. Why is this feature important to you - As a company that produces a lot of content on a regular cadence, we use the copy and submit function but would like the ability to save the items as drafts so that I can prepare the submissions and once I have my final marked up pdf I can then upload to my submission and submit. How would you like the feature to work - same as above Current Behaviour - The content owner either has to fill in our submission form completely and save as draft while they wait for marked up edits/data, etc., or wait until quarter-end and use the copy and submit button for anywhere between 5-15 pieces/content owner and upload/submit all at once.
There are many cases where I would like to report on the number of people added to a program over time, and have those results shared with me on a regular cadence. For example: I would like to report on the number of people that became a campaign member for an automated email campaign per month. Jan = 100 Feb = 200 March = 30 Today the only way to see these results is by creating individual smart lists.
Description - In the Documents area, when linking to a folder via SharePoint, count the files so they show next to the Document menu like individually linked or uploaded files. Why is this feature important to you - Without representing the files in the linked SharePoint folder, it appears as if there are no (or fewer) documents than there are, which can be confusing. How would you like the feature to work - The Documents menu title would have a number next to it that includes items within the linked SharePoint folder. Current Behaviour - When linking to a SharePoint folder, the Documents menu title reflect the number of files in the linked SharePoint folder. If that folder is the only source of documents, it appears as if there are no documents.
Description - currently, in Workload Balancer, you can change the assigned hours per user per project per task. You can increase or decrease hours and that will be reflected in Workfront, however, there is no such information in API. The only field in API there is, is workPerDayList which splits hours per some default calculations (equally across capacity). Why is this feature important to you - to be able to get data of assigned user per day per task from Workload Balancer. How would you like the feature to work - there should be a field that would return an object or array that will show user's hours per task (from Workload Balancer). Current Behaviour - does not exists. There is no API endpoint to get data from Workload Balancer.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.