Allow for Kickstart to add more than one custom form to an object when importing data.
When creating flow steps, allow user to duplicate the current flow step and either add to the current flow or add to another flow.Use case: When creating a Change Score flow step with fairly complex logic (multiple choices, tokens, etc.) that will update the Demographic Score, a user may additionally want to update the Lead Score. Current functionality requires the user to add a new Change Score item and then recreate all of the logic. A clone option would allow the user to duplicate the previous step and then change the few fields that need altered. Alternatively, allow for AND/OR logic on the Change Score step to allow multiple scores to be updated with a single choice.(Example of use case in action shown below)
Would love to bring back the Campaigns feature that allows for grouping of projects to roll up together under one campaign.
It would be great if expenses could be renamed via the terminology pop-up in a user's layout template. This would add the same functionality used for other objects for expenses. Reason being, sometimes use cases utilize this tab to mirror Excel stye reporting (can add many rows to store data) and expenses can be misleading.
Description - Scenario Planner: Import by Project TemplateWhy is this feature important to you - Allows planning for upcoming work by project template which reduces the need to input duration, resources, and budgets. A better head start on planning if the project type is known.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to importing an existing project but instead importing a project template.Current Behaviour - Only offers import of an existing project.
Description - Sometimes, projects must be canceled for one reason or another. But canceling the project for some reason does not close out the tasks under the project, leaving open tasks appearing in reports despite the fact there will never be someone working on those tasks. When canceling a project, all of its associated tasks should be canceled (which currently doesn't seem to be an option) or marked complete. Why is this feature important to you - When deactivating users, we run reports on their open projects or tasks. If they have projects that are canceled, the tasks within those projects still show as "open." The same holds true for open-task reports run for any other purpose--even if the project has been canceled, the report would show the open tasks associated with that project, making it seem work is not being done. How would you like the feature to work - If you cancel a project, its associated tasks are closed out automatically. Current Behaviour - If you cancel a project, its associated tasks remain in the status they were already in.
The dateDifference(t1; t2; unit) function in Fusion allows you to compute the number of hours/days/etc. between two timestamps (t1 and t2) provided. This behaves oddly whenever the number of hours in a day isn't exactly 24, which happens twice a year when crazy countries/localities switch between Daylight Savings Time and Standard Time.Example: On March 10, 2024, at 2am, the clocks "jump" forward to 3am. That is, there technically is no 2:00am to 2:59am on March 10. This results in March 10 having only 23 hours in the day. (The same thing happens on November 3, except we actually repeat 2:00am to 2:59am, resulting in 25 hours in the day.)This website has more information that corroborates: https://www.ge.com/digital/documentation/csense/version2023/Blocks/Daylight_Saving_Time.htm#:~:text=In%20spring%3A%20if%20a%20one,the%20day%20to%2025%20hours.If you're trying to use something like dateDifference(t1; t2; days) and expect something like 2024-03-09T00:00:00 to 2024-03-11T00:00:00 (both in America/Los_Angeles time zone) to return a value of "2", it will instead return a value of "1". This occurs because dateDifference is computing a delta of 47 hours, which is less than 48 ("2 days" as per how dateDifference is written). When dateDifference divides 47 by 48, it results in 1.979... which is then truncated to just "1".Note that this appears unique and different than any other programming language that has similar functions. You can test this using a Java online compiler such as https://www.programiz.com/java-programming/online-compiler/ and the code below: import java.time.ZoneId; import java.time.ZonedDateTime; import java.time.temporal.ChronoUnit; class HelloWorld { public static void main(String[] args) { final ZoneId timeZone = ZoneId.of("America/Los_Angeles"); final ZonedDateTime start = ZonedDateTime.of(2024, 3, 9, 0, 0, 0, 0, timeZone); final ZonedDateTime end = ZonedDateTime.of(2024, 3, 11, 0, 0, 0, 0, timeZone); System.out.println(ChronoUnit.DAYS.between(start, end)); } } Java is appropriately handling the fact that the length of a "day" is actually variable and thinking more in terms of "midnight to midnight" rather than "how many 24 hour periods exist".It is possible to workaround this using by casting every date to UTC, but this is super cumbersome, as shown by this Fusion example: The awareness required around this renders dateDifference as a dangerous function to use without advanced Computer Science knowledge. For example, the help text (shown below) is fairly simple with no warnings around this, nor are the online docs (below) hinting to the need to use UTC -- though they do only show "Z" (UTC) in the examples, which is perhaps too subtle of a thing.Ideally, dateDifference should internally cast to UTC if that's what's required to bring in line with the semantic notion of "hours" or "days" or other units. For dates that are already in UTC, this would be a "no-op" and things would work fine. For non-UTC dates, it would make things more intuitive.While a support ticket was filed on this, they redirected to submit an Idea via the forum here, saying that the current implementation of dateDifference meets the desired behavior and indicated that it would likely only get actioned if it received enough upvotes. So take this as both a warning in use of the function with its current behavior and an idea ask for the community to vote on. Hope this helps someone either way!
Description - Allow Logics (custom field setting) to apply to system default fields available on issue/request forms. Why is this feature important to you - Sometimes there is a need to Display/Skip a custom field on a custom form "if" an Issue Priority, or Project Program or Portfolio or such out of the box field is selected. How would you like the feature to work - Sometimes there is a need to Display/Skip a custom field on a custom form "if" an Issue Priority, or Project Program or Portfolio or such out of the box field is selected. Current Behaviour - It is not possible to Display/Skip a custom field on a custom form and apply logic to default system fields.
Description - our users are wanting a feature where you could “like” ,“love” or "thumbs up" comments on WF Proofs, to show support for a comment. Why is this feature important to you - The benefit of this would be a decrease in the number of “aligned” comments that leadership feels they have to make.How would you like the feature to work - within a proof comment, add a heart or thumbs up button icon next to the Reply button. This button icon would be in addition to the current icons for Attachment, Resolve and Actions.Current Behaviour - no way to indicate agreement on a proof comment except by make an additional comment.
Description - From the Awaiting my approval widget there is no easy way to view the custom form view on a task approval. The user has to make several clicks to get to the form view and it is not ideal. The old experience had an option to view the tasks custom form right from the work list item. We would like to see this capability on the new home widget as well.Why is this feature important to you - it will provide for the users a quicker way to access a task custom form for review and approval, Additionally making it easier for my users to adopt using the the new Home experience.How would you like the feature to work - in the Awaiting my approval widget, a link or button should be added on a task approval that will take you directly to the form for reviewing and editing.Current Behaviour - in the widget, the user has to make several clicks to get to the task form view and it is not ideal.
I noticed that the native fields list does not include project budget field and other finance fields. It would be nice to have this feature because we have to use a calculated field to display it elsewhere.Here is the screenshot of the update I'm referring to:Edit:Additionally, the issues object does not have the "Assignments" native field.Use case: In the project issues section, we want to hide the default Assignments field and show it only on the form for specific queue topics.
Currently AEP RTCDP do not have inbuilt destination for Reddit. Looking for something similar to https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-platform/destinations/catalog/social/linkedin.html which is for Linkedin.
Description - When an issue is resolved by another object, the status and progress are locked and only updated via the resolvable. Unfortunately, if you were to mark the resolving/converted project as Dead, the issue is also Dead and will no longer update regardless of the updates that continue to happen on the project. For example, you convert an issue to a project, work starts and the team thinks it's a duplicate ask so they mark the project as Dead. A meeting happens, and you learn that it is very similar to an existing project but unique enough to continue so you update the project's status to Current. Meanwhile, the Issue will continue to say Dead and you cannot update the status because it is locked by the resolving project. I would like for the issue to continue monitoring the resolving project and update the status if the project reopens (from being Complete or Dead). Why is this feature important to you - If the project management team isn't aware of this you have issues telling a completely different story than what is happening which can skew metrics. This is especially damaging if you have one person reporting from the issues and another person reporting from the projects. We always want our metrics and reports to be accurate since those are influencing business decisions. How would you like the feature to work - The issue's status would update from Dead to In Progress if the resolving project status changed from Dead back to Current or Planning. Current Behaviour - Currently the only workaround is to manually remove the resolve by information, save the issue, and then add the resolve by information back since you cannot update the issue's status individually while a resolvable is listed.
Improve the Time Zones in the user set up: 1. Need the ability to add a Time Zone that's not in the list. For example, we need the Time Zone for Costa Rica and it's not available. 2. Add in the Abbreviations for the Time Zones to make them easier to find. 3. Alphabetize the Time Zones list to make it easier to find the one you're looking for.
Is it possible to add a 4th level of queue topic to the existing request queue. This could be helpful for providing more specific categorization or prioritization options for incoming requests. This additional queue topic level would help us to minimize the # of request queues we're having to create for our Marketing team. This feature would allow me to consolidate 15+ current queues into one Marketing queue.
Description - The To do list on the Workfront (workspaces) dashboard could use improving. If it could build a tiered To-do list, it would be much more viable.Why is this feature important to you - I have multiple projects with multiple sub-tasks, and i want to keep tasks under the parent project.How would you like the feature to work - When creating a new to-do and hitting enter, you can create a new top level to-do, or by hitting tab, you can create a child to-do item which remains tied to the parent. The parent to-do can be collapsed to hide all the child to-do items.Current Behaviour - Every to-do is an independent action not tied to a parent activity.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Users should be able to preview ZIP files Use-case: As a DAM user I should be able to preview the contents of the ZIP files before unzipping them to save DAM storage space. Current/Experienced Behavior: With the new released feature, we can unzip the contents of the ZIP file. Improved/Expected Behavior: Being able to preview the content of the ZIP before unzipping Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Philip Morris International Management SA Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
I'd like to be able to put notes on templates that DO NOT carry over onto a project so the project managers can use it as a guide.We have a lot of scenarios that are if/then and it gets hard to remember them all.
Description - If I have a project template that has tasks with several roles assigned, and then determine that I don't need to fill each role, I'd like to have a way to bulk remove unassigned roles from task assignments. Why is this feature important to you - I noticed one time when I had it assigned to one UX Designer (name Jeri Bailer), but had a second UX Designer role assigned to the same task but left UNassigned. It then was not calculating Jeri's time off in the project timeline. It was assuming we would assign someone else who could work through her time off. Therefore this affected the project's overall timeframe. How would you like the feature to work - If I remove a person from an assigned role or leave a role unassigned, I'd like to have an option to remove unassigned roles from all assignments. Current Behaviour - See Why above. Also see screenshots of the example with the unassigned role left in and it's affect on the timeline versus removed. Jeri has PTO scheduled in her Time Off field from Feb 26 to Mar 4. You'll see one attachment shows the work being completed through that task b/c there is an unassigned UX Designer to the task. The other attachment will show you the change in timeline when I remove the unassigned role and it then calculates in Jeri's time off. It not a big deal to remove one or two roles, but sometimes it's every task in the project and that is tedious.
When using collections in reporting, the data in the collections cannot be sorted. If pulling data such as upcoming time off, the dates cannot be sorted in chronological order. This can be very confusing. See screenshot attached.
If a portfolio is deleted inadvertently, it would be nice if it could be moved back from the recycle bin. In fact, it would be nice if any deletion would stay in the recycle bin for a short time to have the same thing done.
Description - I'd like to see a pop-up survey the way Workfront does "Share your feedback to help us improve Adobe Workfront" but make it so the org admins can create/modify our own to get our users' feedback.Why is this feature important to you - I want to help my customers feel heard, be able to voice their concerns, and have it in a quick way that they can participate when they want (not when it's pressured from management to do so in an email).How would you like the feature to work - I would like it work on a scale of 1-5 and an open text field for them to write specific feedback.Current Behaviour - We currently do not have a feature like this. We have to gather feedback manually on calls, or, I can create a request queue but we already have enough of those and we're not trying to create work for our users.
This post has been closed as a duplicate. All votes have been moved to the original: Have separate Field API Names vs Label We present client-specific forms in Workfront. There will be times when two clients will each need a field called X but with different, client-specific properties. For example, each of our clients manages multiple brands. We want to create a drop-down field of Client A’s brands, and a drop-down field of Client B’s brands. Both clients need to see their field called “Brand” on their forms, but today, two different drop-downs cannot both have a Label of “Brand”. We are forced to invent a label the client doesn’t recognize. This is a problem which will compound as we bring more and more clients on board. The request is to allow multiple fields to be labeled the same but have a different unique ID to differentiate them so they can have different attributes and be used for different purposes/clients.
Ability to automatically subscribe certain users to projects based on the template the project was created from. With so many projects going through the system, we're finding that users don't get email notifications without subscribing, but there is no automatic way to have them subscribed.
Description - I learned last week that a user can attach a template to a personal project and once the template is attached, there's not much you can do about it. Meaning the program, portfolio, custom forms and other objects are attached forever. I would like Workfront to remove the ability to attach templates or associate personal tasks with any other work objects. Why is this feature important to you - This is extremely important to me because it deeply affects reporting and keeping the system clean. Also since the To-Do feature uses Personal Tasks, Personal Task Projects are now more prominent meaning anyone can accidentally make this mistake and no one would be the wiser. How would you like the feature to work - When a user attempts to attach a template, add a custom form or edit the personal tasks project they get an error message similar to the one I get when I try to remove these objects. "Error 403: Cannot modify personal project /attask/api-internal/PROJ/" Current Behaviour - The user can attach a template and unknowingly tie the personal tasks project to business initiatives. The only way to undo this is by deleting the personal task project.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
