I know this one is a hard one. Yet, take into account that, in order to comply with GDPR, we are all implementing Double-Opt-In processes on our Marketo instances, the second step of which is based on email clicks.The number of people that see links scanner triggering false clicks on emails is clearly increasing since @Devraj Grewal post 2 years ago (Email was clicked before it was delivered? It's a link scanner ), down to @Courtney Grimes's blog article . And so far, no really satisfactory solution has been found, despite all the creativity and research from community members (look at @Dan Stevens's 45 minutes wait step here or @Sanford Whiteman multiple contributions on this)This means that we are going to confirm opt-in based on link scanner clicks... Sounds bad, don't you think?So, we really need Marketo to invest into Link Scanner-Proof email click detection. Maybe combining clicks with user agent detection, rapidity/multiplicity of the clicks, email address domains and a little of AI/deep learning (leveraging the trillions of email click events registered in Marketo systems) could lead to a much better reliability-Greg
Pardot recently announced they are putting several things in place to get rid of bot clicks. One of the simplest ones being IP-based filtering. We have asked Marketo if they could forward the IP address with click data so we could do something about it. Marketo already has this information. Why can't they filter clicks based on IP addresses that many of these security appliances publicise?Rejecting clicks before the email was even delivered, would be helpful too.There are some obvious patterns Marketo to look for - like clicks on every single link or multiple links in a very short timespan.Or clicks that didn't result in a web pageview. We don't have a simple mechanism to link the two, since Marketo doesn't send the clickId to the web pageview. But Marketo has that info.This is becoming a big problem, since we can't do any lead nurturing or other campaigns due to bots clicking.Thanks.Swapna
Description - Add the ability to set a default status on the Queue TopicWhy is this feature important to you - By default all new requests, unless you allow the user to choose the status of a request, get created as "New". It would allow better triage and management to allow statuses to defaulted. Different topics could then have different initial valuesHow would you like the feature to work - Add the status field to the Queue Topic form. If no value selected then the current behavior is kept. Added option could be that it is also added to Routing Current Behaviour - Only NEW is available. Existing Queue Topics should be defaulted.
Description - Would it be possible to allow Default Views applied to Widgets to be configured/selected in Layout Template?Why is this feature important to you - We have a lot of custom fields and being able to apply custom views as Default Views to Widgets would make the Widgets much more useful to us especially My projects Widget.How would you like the feature to work - I think it would make the most sense to have the requested feature added to Home Workspace\Widget Settings in Layout Template and allow the same type of options as Filters in 24.4 release (April 11, 2024)Current Behaviour - There is no way to configure/select Default Views applied to Widgets.
Description - It would be helpful to be able to send regular updates about a project that is added as a custom dashboard to particular projects. Why is this feature important to you - The report is added on a custom dashboard within user's projects that are added from a particular template (the report/dashboard of reports do not show up for all users but only for ones added to certain projects). End users who receive the report in email on regular basis need information that is relevant to their project and not everything in the report. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to send/schedule send of reports or dashboard of reports (automatically, without having to add users manualy)) to team members of particular projects. Current Behaviour - Currently it is not possible to automatically send a dashboard of reports to users; it is also not possible to send a report/dashboard or reports added to particular projects to only members of those projects.
Description -> Can we make a Workfront Desktop Application.Why is this feature important to you -> This would help as we could set Workfront to launch on startup which would increase usage and be helpful when it comes to change management and adoption.How would you like the feature to work -> The same way it works in the web browser but via an app.Current Behaviour -> Workfront is currently web browser based.
Description - Workfront consistently has problems with returning results in searchs and filters for deactivated users. Users who are deactivated won't show up in search prompts and in filter options in reporting (like user name equals). From discussions with support and product people, it sounds like the reason is because we don't want deactivated users to show up when dealing with task assignments. I agree, we don't want that. But you should be able to figure out how to program for this problem so they won't show up for task assignments but WILL show up in other areas where you're filtering and searching. Why is this feature important to you - User management is more cumbersome because of this all or nothing approach that is currently in place. We regularly have to do checks that require finding deactivated users and not being able to search them normally just increases the admin burden to find them - and train everyone else who needs to find them how to workaroudn the issue. How would you like the feature to work - Fix the programming of how your search works so that you cannot pull a deactivated user for task assigments but can search them normally or add them to filters normally. The "deactivated" tag that appears by their names in reports is incredibly helpful and utilizing that should help users understand who is deactivated if they're searching for a user or if they're filtering into a report. Current Behaviour - You cannot pull deactivated users into filters using "equals" prompts. The site search also now (as of 7/14/23) doesn't let you search for deactivated users. That site search seems to change periodically between allowing the search of deactivated users and not allowing it. Seems like changes are getting made to that, probably without someone understanding what happens.
We'd like to have the option to make modifications to a task that is pending approval. For example, we'd like to be able to change the task dates or move the task to a different project. This is important because we frequently find that we are having to temporarily change the task status back to make these modifications, which is not an ideal experience.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - Our design team works with these file types and isn't able to run them through proof anymore causing extra work.
Description -For projects that include an approval process, there currently is no option available to setup automated reminder notification email to notify users that their approval is still pending. This is a huge obstacle for anyone who intends to leverage approval processes as part of their projects. Why is this feature important to you - Needed for projects developments How would you like the feature to work - To be able to customize a timeframe for users to respond to a pending approval and have the system send out an automated reminder notification once that time frame has lapsed. Current Behaviour - None.
Description - Be able to forecast projects without having to actually add the project and add users to it and then possibly having to delete everythingWhy is this feature important to you – Want to be able to add projects or requests, assign them to users and then see how that would affect the resource balancing and affect other projects they are working on.How would you like the feature to work – The ability to add project and assign resources without it automatically saving. We could do some forecasting on resources and see how a new high priority project would affect other projects without having emails sent to users and then once we get our data we can decide to either save it or not.Current Behavior – The ability to enter in a project and assign users to tasks/requests without having it save automatically and not send out notifications to the assigned users as we just want to see how this new project would affect resources and affect other projects. We have to add the project, assign resources, look at resource balancing, planner. Get all the reports and then go in and delete the project as we just need to do this to get information to the stakeholder so they can decide if they want to move forward or not.
I'm conducting A4T Auto Target testing and I'd like to be able to set an alert (trigger an alert email) when one of my tests begins trending negative beyond a threshold. I want to ease the daily workload burden of checking each of my workspaces in Analytics workspace. The current functionality of Alerts requires the user to ID specific metrics and filter in the Alert builder. With Auto Target (A4T), Lift is not a field within the table, so I am unable to select it to create an alert. I'm also unable to build my lift calculation in the Alert builder. It would be ideal if I could click on my summary change visualization and create an alert from it. If its value met some criteria, then send email alert.
Description - There should be an option to remove/hide document approvals in layouts Why is this feature important to you - This would allow admins to control the usage of document approvals and it would eliminate the need to search for approvals in multiple places (document/proof) How would you like the feature to work - In setup> interface>layout templates the 'Customize what users see' dropdown would have a drop down for documents Current Behaviour - Documents do not appear as an option
Description - It may seem simple and maybe even nitpicky, but I would like for the very basic formatting and alignment of the text in the #Description section of my scheduled project to, in turn, be directly reflected in the body of the emails received by the end users when they receive their scheduled emails instead of an incoherent, congealed blob of text. Why is this feature important to you - I already have a difficult time getting my end users to read the emails they receive without #Adobe making my job and my data storytelling more difficult. How would you like the feature to work - At the very least, I would like the body of the emails to reflect the formatting and spacing the way it is laid out in the Description section to schedule my project, whether I'm scheduling a new project or editing an existing project. In fact, it would even be better if we had simple HTML editing capabilities to allow for richer content, and I know this should be possible. Current Behavior - Today, any text appearing in the Description is single-spaced together and placed in the body of the recipient's email with no formatting, minus one exception. That exception allows for any hyperlinks appearing in the text are made active and usable. These messages provide so much opportunity and potential for engagement with our data end-users, and this is one place where we are really dropping the ball, folks!
Description - pretty much every other dashboarding solution allows uploading images in a dashboard whereas in Analysis Workspace, you must provide an image URL which is a major issue for many of my clients. Why is this feature important to you - it is a standard feature in pretty much all other dashboarding solutions, even the free ones like Looker Studio. How would you like the feature to work - have a drop zone or dedicated image upload button to upload the image on Adobe servers where they stay connected to the current dashboard and get removed once the dashboard is deleted. Current Behaviour - you must have your own image hosting, worst case use internet service like imgur to get an image URL that can be used Side note: I would add a screenshot here but the functionality currently seems broken.
We would like the ability to add another decision at the task/document level to streamline our process. We use automated workflows for decisions. Having only two decision options: approval or rejection, causes the team to have additional conversations (and delays) which a button for Approved with Changes would solve.
Description - Imagine you're working on a project and everyone needs to okay the work at different steps. But once a step is done, it'd be great if there was a way for either the person in charge or the users to decide, "Hey, we don't need to get this person's okay for the next steps." This would make things a lot smoother and faster. Why is this feature important to you - We want to quickly see who's approved the proof at different stages without the need for all approvers to approve again if there's a new version. How would you like the feature to work - Often new versions are only needed by current proofs stage participants. Example: content teams has looked over a proof and decided it's fine. We only need design input after that. After design input, we need leadership approval, but we don't want to both content/design at this stage. I propose a stage setting that says, "Approvals not needed for this stage after current version is fully approved" or something like that. Current Behaviour - I know there's a work around to remove close stages after they're complete, knowing that previous versions will capture their decisions. But it's be nice to have an easier way to see those approvals without having to sift through multiple versions.
We would like the ability to post Figma URLs as an interactive review. We can do this somewhat as an interactive review, but would love to see added functionality:Stay connected through SSO to Figma (via the WF viewer) so you don't have to log to Figma in every time you open an interactive proof.Push the annotations from WF to the Figma page so the designer can reference them directly in Figma when working on the changes. Likewise, push resolved status back into WF so that comments show as resolved in WF.Export PDFs directly from Figma into WF to kick off a review (as opposed to downloading from Figma and uploading back into WF).
Description - Current Target APIs for List Offers and Creating Offers - do not return folders that offers belong to - allow creating Offer-folders - pushing new offers created using APIs into existing folders. Why is this feature important to you - We use APIs extensively to manage and create offers. Folders provide a very clean way to organise offers, especially for accounts with hundreds of offers. Having above capabilities will reduce a lot of manual work thats currently required to move API-created-offers to Offer-folders. How would you like the feature to work - 1. Extend the current Offer-list API (https://developers.adobetarget.com/api/#list-offers) to return the Offer-folder name/id an offer belongs to 2. Extend the current Create-Offer API (https://developers.adobetarget.com/api/#create-offer) to allow referring to the Offer-folder 3. Create a set of new APIs to fetch the list of Offer-folders and create new folders Current Behaviour - Offer-folders are available just under the Target UI.
How would you like the feature to work - It would be good to add the custom code only when the activity/experience is displayed.Current Behaviour - At the moment custom code is running even when the activity is not displayed due to lower priority. Here are some related threads.https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-target-questions/adobe-target-custom-code-is-running-for-hidden-activity-due-to/td-p/661650
Description -Introducing logs that enable the validation of the status and invocation times of Target APIs. With regards to batchUpdate, these logs not only provide insight into the status and timing of the service invocation, but also furnish additional details concerning the completion (or error) of updating profiles and attributes. Why is this feature important to you -It would enhance visibility into response times and the status of all Target calls, thereby facilitating better management and analysis of them.
Most of our mobile pages are AMP pages. It would be of vital importance for us, if we want to continue using Adobe Target, to implement it on these pages.We have thought about some possibilities: rawbox or make an Adobe Target Server Side implementation and encapsulate it to follow this pattern https://amp.dev/documentation/guides-and-tutorials/develop/interactivity/remote-dataBut the implementation, on our side, is very complex. If there was a simple way like in App, it would be very useful. This is our comment in the community: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-target-questions/adobe-target-implementation-on-amp-accelerated-mobile-pages/m-p/652735#M10237
In order to effectively link email marketing campaigns to website KPIs such as visits, pageviews, etc., the one parameter that makes this analysis possible is a "Sent Date" field for the email campaigns. Case in point, if one launches an email campaign on a particular day and there is a corresponding peak in web activity that same day such as an increase in visits, then we can attribute that increased web activity to the email.However, I wish when I exported email performance reports from Marketo, that a "Sent Date" field could be associated with emails that are sent 1 time such as those you see with programs and streams. I am not too concerned about automatic email notifications that result from form fill outs for example but just those emails that are indeed campaigns. Through analysis done either through spreadsheets or business intelligence tools such as Tableau, one can link all of the information together to show campaign-specific impact on website analytics just by having the email sent date and the Google Analytics activity date. Without the email sent date though, there is no chance to link the data, aside from manually creating a column in your spreadsheet and entering the date yourself.
Description - Display document version to the attachments section on the board and include the document activity log to the general issue activity log Why is this feature important to you - user experience, this feature would increase the visibility to the updates that happened on the documents and will significantly reduce the time spent on trying to find the updatesHow would you like the feature to work1. Document version (V1, V2, etc) displayed in the attachment section 2. List contributors of the document3. Include the document activity log to the overall issue/task activity log that is grabbed and displayed on the boardCurrent Behaviour - There is no way of identifying whether the document has more than one version
One area that I find very difficult to manage is following up on Comments I have made to make sure I receive a response. I would like a way to set my Comments with a Status and set a follow-up date, so I could create a report that would show me Comments that I want to watch to make sure someone replies and receive a notification that my Comment is set to follow-up. This feature would allow me to stop using a different tool, such as Outlook, to monitor project updates.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
