Additional reports available for A/B tests. If we test one email version against another – would love to see an email link report for each test version as opposed to just the general A/B test view.
Marketo should allow us to update our field mappings in the platform rather than having to go through support.As business needs develop and marketing becomes more sophisticated we are making changes to our systems. New fields are added, old fields become deprecated, others are repurposed.Marketo creating and automatically syncing new Salesforce fields can be helpful, but I've had instances where I want to sync an existing Marketo field to our CRM, for example capturing behaviour scores in SFDC that we roll up to Accounts for an overall picture of the engagement at that level. Or the email preferences to pass through to our CS tool and make sure those updates are reflected in all the necessary platforms. As it stands to make those kinds of changes we create fields and then have to make the requests to support to update any mappings, as Marketo automatically syncs the new fields instead of giving us the option to map to an existing field.It adds time and hassle to what should be relatively straightforward updates, as well as being work for the Adobe support team. I've used Hubspot historically and their mappings are very easy to manage, recognising new fields but allowing you to specify the map and even the sync behaviour/data priority.
When browsing or querying assets using the REST API (GET /rest/asset/v1/landingPages.json || /rest/asset/v1/landingPage/{{id}}.json) , the response for the status key does not have the value approved with draft :{ "success": true, "errors": [], "requestId": "844f#18c89c040e5", "warnings": [], "result": [ { "id": 10767, ... "status": "approved" } ] } but the status approved with draft is available in the reports via the UI - and annoyingly, the asset ID is not available in the UI reports Please standardise the UI reports and REST API responses.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud uses AI to send an email out to a person at their best engaged time, I assume based on when they have opened emails before. I saw this in a webinar but have not actually used the platform before.This would be really helpful as a/b tests on send times work for some but not others. If you can increase the likelihood of an open at the best time for a person, this would have a much higher open rate on an emailCan Marketo look at implementing something similar? This would improve our email stats heaps!
Dear Community, We are proposing a feature to be added to Marketo. We have been using the Program Member Custom Fields for some of our campaigns, and it is working quite well. However, after the campaign has been completed. When we query a Smart List within the program, there is no way to view the Program Member Custom Fields values in the SL. We understand to view the PMCF data, we need to click the Members tab in the program and create a custom view that includes said field(s). However, if we ever needed to run an SL with various filters, then this is not possible to do so. It will be great to add the functionality in future releases as it will be very beneficial for campaign analysis. Thanks a lot!Wayne
Hello techies,In the dynamic landscape of the market, where change is the only constant, our marketing strategies must adapt swiftly. Through diligent research, it has become evident that a two-step form yields superior results compared to its lengthier counterpart. Additionally, the necessity for an attachment field has become apparent across various business sectors.Hence, I humbly request the implementation of the following features:1. Incorporation of a two-step/two-page form functionality, akin to the capabilities found in Form Assembly and Form Stack.2. Integration of an attachment field type, mirroring the functionality available in Form Assembly and Form Stack.The absence of these features compels many enterprises to allocate resources towards multiple form-building platforms. For instance, while utilizing Marketo forms for lead generation and events, alternative solutions like Form Assembly or other form builders are sought for attachment inclusion or two-page formatting.Could we kindly explore the possibility of integrating these functionalities within Marketo? I am more than willing to furnish additional details or engage in further discussion on this matter.Thanks,Sant
I am writing to formally request an extension of the integration license between Zoom and Marketo to accommodate more than the current limit of 40 users. This adjustment is essential to enhance our workflow and enable us to have visibility into the webinars of all users with access to both Zoom and Marketo, rather than exclusively access webinars created by a specific set of 40 individuals.Our team identified the need to simplify webinar management and focus on a larger group of contributors. By expanding the integration license to cover additional users, we aim to improve efficiency and ensure that our resources are directed towards webinars relevant to our purposes.This adjustment is crucial for optimizing our collaborative workflow, ensuring that relevant stakeholders can contribute to and manage webinars efficiently. We believe that widening the scope of users with the ability to create webinars will positively impact our organizational objectivesThank you for considering our request. We are eager to receive your feedback and are available for further discussions or clarifications as needed.
＜要望＞Marketoのフォルダーが並んでいるカラム（ツリー）について、表示の異常が発生しました。個人な環境の問題かと思ったのですが、別の人も同じ現象が発生していたため、Adobe社にサポートいただいた。 表示の異常は、プログラム名の重複表示、フォルダー等の文字の重複などです。 原因は使用しているブラウザのキャッシュに加え、Marketo自体のツリーキャッシュの可能性があるとのことで、対処いただいて症状は解消しましたが、Marketo自体のツリーキャッシュの不具合発生時は、再度、Adobe社にサポートをいただく必要があるとのことでした。 長くなりましたが提案としまして、下記2点を記します。(1) ツリーキャッシュの定期的、もしくは不具合検出時の自動クリア(2) ツリーキャッシュクリアの権限をユーザーに付与 以前にもキャンペーンプログラムを起動してもアイコンの表示が切り替わらないなどがありましたが、Adobe社のサポートに連絡するまででもない表示エラーが発生するケースはありますので、ご検討いただければと思います。
標記の接続について、動作確認がされていないとサポートからお聞きしました。ユーザーとしてはコスト面でメリットがありますので、ぜひ動作確認をしていただきたいです。もし既に接続を行ってみた方がいらっしゃったら情報を共有いただけると助かります。
カスタムフィールドの管理を行っております。「フィールドの更新をブロック」の設定内容はエクスポートや一覧で確認できるすべがないため、管理に手間とミスが発生するリスクがあります。様々な流入元からリードデータが入ってくるような使い方をしている場合に、フィールドを更新するかどうかは重要な設定となりますので何らかの方法で一覧が入手できる用にしていただきたいです。 よろしくお願いします。
MSIでOutlookプラグインを使用してメールを送信すると、送信されたメールが「送信済み」BOXと「削除済み」BOXの両方に格納されます。メール送信者からすると通常のメールでは起きない挙動なだけに、ちゃんと送られているか不安になります。管理者からすると想定外の挙動なので、ちゃんと送れていると断定出来ません。また、「削除済み」BOXのメールは開封ができるので、開封数のデータ集計も乱れてしまいます。 上記のことから、MSIでOutlookプラグインで送信後に削除済みフォルダーに格納されない機能の追加を起案いたします。
MSIでOutlookプラグインから送信したメールが開封されると開封アラートが送信者に発信されるトリガーキャンペーンを組んでおります。この場合、「送信済み」BOXに格納されたメールを送信者が開封する（見返す）と、それもトリガーの対象になってしまい、狙い通りのオペレーション・分析が出来ません。上記のことから、送信者が「送信済み」BOXでメールを開封する（見返す）してもキャンペーンの対象外にすることができる仕様の追加を起案します。
Running into an issue with new freemails that have been developed and are not included in Marketo's global form validation rule. We can't add them and maintain the current Marketo list. Would be great to be able to add multiple rules and also to have rules only apply to specific forms.
アイデアfacebookリード獲得広告について、複数のビジネスマネージャーとMarketoを連携させ自動化できるようにしていただきたいです背景弊社では、サービスごとにfacebookビジネスマネージャーが存在しています合併や組織の統合によって、ビジネスマネージャーが複数存在することがありますMarketoの仕様上、1つのビジネスマネージャーに1Marketoという状況だと思いますが、複数紐づけたり、launchpointを分けることでユーザーごとに異なるビジネスマネージャーを選択できたらうれしいです。
Zoomウェビナーと、マルケトのイベントプログラムの連携は、1対1の関係となっており、同じ内容のイベントを複数日開催したい場合、Zoomウェビナーを複数スケジュールすると、マルケトのイベントプログラムもその数だけ作成しなければいけません。マルケトのイベントプログラムは1つで、1つのフォームから好きな日程を選ぶことができ、複数のZoomウェビナーとの連携ができれば、フォームがいくつにもまたがらずお客様のページ遷移やクリックが減りますし、またフォームを量産する手間も省けて便利です。
I got the chance to use Interactive Webinars recently ahead of our 2024 webinar season. It would be great to allow an option for hosting pre-recorded webinars that will still take place in a set time. GoTo currently allows this and its a great feature:
The suggestion is to add to the list of trigger tokens a new set of trigger tokens for Marketo Program triggers:- Added to Engagement Program- Engagement Program Cadence Changes- Engagement Program Stream Changes- Program Member Data is Changed- Program Status is Changed The primary use case would be the {{trigger.Name}} token, which could be used in the above triggered campaigns to populate the Program Name in a flow step to enable program-level changes at a global level. For example, in our instance, we need to populate a Program Member Custom Field (PMCF) with a common value whenever a lead reaches success in a program. Currently, we have to add the flow step in each individual program to set the PMCF. If we had a trigger token, we could have a single global campaign that could populate the PMCF across campaigns. Here's an example of the campaign setup: Smart List:Program Member Status is Changed--- Program: Is Any--- Success: TrueFlow:Change Program Member Data--- Program: {{token.Name}}--- Attribute: [PMCF]--- New Value: [value]
By adding further fields into the Assets class (Email, Landing Pages, etc.) further integration with Digital Assets Management platforms would be possible. At present our Emails and Landing Pages must be approved for use - regulated industry - which requires an "export" (detailed below) and manage the approval in the DAM. - Emails - send a preview, receive the preview, save or print as a PDF, upload to the DAM platform, start the approval - Landing Pages - send the preview URL to a third-party platfrom to save as a PDF, upload to the DAM platform, start the approvalOnce approved, the status of the Asset is then manually recorded in Marketo. Drawbacks - aside from all of the manual steps, there is no alert or mechanism to ensure the Asset is removed fom use if it expires, or becomes unapproved. With additional fields in the Assets class, the DAM could contact Marketo, and update the Status field on an Asset, and be used to alert the Asset Owner for updates on the Asset.
It would be amazing to have a batch process for removing assets from the campaigns they are used by. That way if something needs to be swapped out for a campaign, say a list that lives in multiple campaigns, you can quickly remove it from all. Even better would be a feature where you can use the layout of "choices" to select which programs you want to remove from and or add things to.
I always thought it would be a good idea to have a "max amount of times" constraint similar to how we have "min amount of times" constraint. Example: "Clicks link in email" filter or trigger, you can say clicks at minimum x amount of times, but I think it would be helpful if we had a max filter as well so when people get click happy, it would max out and prevent people from being scored if they click 100 times.
In the Marketo User Group tab it would be good to have calendar view options, which could be filtered by regions (timezones), Chapters and also in-person and virtual.So you could see for example all virtual MUG Chapter meetings together across the coming month for say EMEA or all regions.A global view could show all virtual or in-person MUGs with time and date. Using colour coding views within a region say America you can see all in-person events going up month by month or for the full year. The calendar will allow you to see which MUG meetings you can join live and others to register for recordings for those out of your time zone.
It would be great when using Opportunity Influence Analyzer in the "Account" section that you could just search for the opportunity number ID in the case of when it's a large company and they may have several opportunities against it.
Use Case: Our forms on our website include a "comments" text field. This is important in order for the customer to provide contextual information about their request to the sales team. Today we collect this data on a form to a sync'd field on the LEAD and CONTACT objects in SFDC. We then use a workflow in SFDC to write the value of this field to a custom field on the Campaign Member. What I would like to do is use the PMCF campaign member sync to pass this value over instead. Unfortunately this is not currently supported per the documentation as "Text" fields are not allowed on the Program Member object. REQUEST: I'd like to request having a text field be added as a field type as a PMCF and allow us to sync it to a campaign member custom field.
It would be helpful if there was a column in the landing page export file from the Design Studio to indicate if a landing page is archived. It currently shows all landing pages in the .csv export. An Archived = Yes/No column would help cut through the noise.
＜要望内容＞Salesforce上で同姓同名の別ユーザーがいる場合、スマートキャンペーンのフローでCreate TaskのOwnerを設定する際にどのユーザーが設定したいユーザーなのかを判別できない状況になります。ユーザーの氏名情報でTask Ownerを選択するのではなく、ユーザーのメールアドレスやID情報で選択できるようにするなど、判別できる方法があると良いです。 対処方法として現行はSalesforceのユーザー氏名情報の登録を変更し重複しない氏名にしてからTask Ownerを設定するようにしていますが、氏名情報を書き換えると不自然な表示になることもあり、Task Owner選択の方法を改善していただきたいです。
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
