Adobe Workfront

My current fusion flow is when content owners submits project requests it will automatically convert that into a project using a pre built template that I have defined. Later it assigns tasks inside that so for instance all the tasks realted to project manager should be assigned to this person. It is working perfectly fine but the issue is when the project has 10 tasks it sends 10 emails and I would like to built something like how workload balancer works were in only one email is sent rather than 10how can I do that in fusion

Hi everyone, We're trying to automate our Workfront Environment Promotion workflow via API but encountering several blocking issues. We're on Workfront Ultimate using API v15.0. Issues Found: 1. Cannot create packages via API POST /environment-promotion/api/v1/packagesResult: HTTP 500 - Package created but status is ASSEMBLING_FAILED Tested with CTGY, PARAM, TMPL, GROUP objects. Same objects work fine via UI. 2. Cannot change status to TESTING or ACTIVE via API PATCH /environment-promotion/api/v1/packages/{id}Body: { "status": "TESTING" } or { "status": "ACTIVE" }Result: HTTP 200 - But package becomes UNASSEMBLED instead The PATCH returns success but triggers a re-assembly that empties the package. What works- GET /packages - List/get packages- POST /packages/{id}/prepare-installation - Prepare install- POST /packages/{id}/install - Execute install Current workaroundWe must use the UI for package creation and status changes. Only installation works via API. Questions 1. Is there a work

Currently when a notification is sent via Workfront it adds the reporter name followed by email address as notifications@my.workfront.com.Can we get the Display name customized in such a way that the emails received doesnt have an individual name rather Show as Workfront / or any customized name as per Project followed by the email address notifications@my.workfront.com

I'm new to Fusion and one of the quick wins we've identified is pulling the overall deliverable due date custom field in the issue into the project template. The goal is for the last task due date which is release final files automatically aligns with the overall due date set by the client in their request. Is this even possible and if so, what happens to the tasks if the time allotted doesn't align with the template? Any insights would be helpful to the possibility, concerns and even how to start setting this up as a scenario. Thanks in advance!

For your Friday amusement, in case anyone else has had a long week too -     In the Spiderman comic books, Uncle Ben famously tells Peter Parker -  'With great power comes great responsibility'. Alas, I did not benefit from having an Uncle Ben, so my paraphrased saying goes, 'With great power comes occasional shenanigans...'.   Professional Use-Case: As part of rolling out the Adobe Admin Console, I granted all users in my instance access to our sandbox environment to make sure they had established their Adobe IDs prior to migration of our production instance. While this idea worked well, and allowed us to troubleshoot issues prior to the full roll-out, it also left me worried that some of my team might accidentally continue accessing the sandbox environment and lose the work they had completed there. In theory, I could have waited until we launched production and simply revoked their access to the sandbox, but I wanted to leave that available for training and

How it should work:I would like see field set or container of multiple fields which the user can add multiple times when filling the form. The field logic inside the field set should be self sufficient, which means that when I select a select a value in drop down in instance 1 of the field sets, the fields of instances 2-n are not impacted. The field set should be like a repeatable subform in form. I don’t know if you can make a section repeatable as it it already a container of fields. What it should solve:We had multiple time the situation that we have to add the same combination of fields to the same custom form.  Here is two examples from our project history:1. Service and Complaints Management (Request), where you have to add add multiple times for same information. E.g:SKU (External Lookup Fields) Count (Textfield with Number) Failure Type (Drop Down) Failure Description (Textarea, but only showed when specific Failure Type was displayed)We ended up adding the same fields multipl

I'm trying to create a report that shows how many projects have a task planned date that is past due by project manager.So I either need to use the task-level report I already have and create a chart by unique value of project name, OR I need to create a project-level report that draws on task planned dates within that project. Has anyone created anything like this?

We have a Kanban Board, which is configured to automatically intake items to the board.Intake sources is a custom filter, which includesProject: Status > Is None of > Complete Dead Queue The board populated correctly, with a card in New for project PN1762400.Since then, the project status for PN1762400 has been changed to Dead.The connected card is still showing in the New column. Can/should cards be automatically removed in this situation?

Hello, I am trying to build a report that shows planned v actual hours on a milestone.  I built a task report.  Am trying to figure out how to create a variance column that calculates the difference between actual and planned hours to make this easier for the stakeholders to read.  I had a formula that was giving me a blank column.  simplifying it, i just put a column in there, and its giving me nulls.  See screenshot.   Can anyone advise me on what I need to do, or where there is documentation that explains how to do this?  AI got me this far and suggested using text mode, but there’s something I am missing here and I can’t figure it out on my own.  Thanks in advance! 

One of our groups wants to use the idea or planning project status without those projects being considered in the project condition. I can’t find documentation saying if these two statuses are included in this; does anyone have documentation or know the answer?Thanks!

Hey there, Part of the proofing process is our team verifying that the bookmark/layer names on the PDF are correct. However, you cannot see the bookmark names unless you download the file which unfortunately defeats the purpose of us using the viewer and also comparing files side-by-side. Could this be something that get added in the future? 

Overall, I am just trying to get a list of people who dont have any active assignments. I think I got most of the way there but I feel like this is not bringing in items that people may be actively on but have a planned completion date farther out.  What i have (user report) EXISTS:a:$$EXISTSMOD=NOTEXISTSEXISTS:a:$$OBJCODE=ASSGNEXISTS:a:assignedToID=FIELD:IDEXISTS:a:task:plannedCompletionDate=$$TODAYbwEXISTS:a:task:plannedCompletionDate_Mod=betweenEXISTS:a:task:plannedCompletionDate_Range=$$TODAYb+2whomeTeamID=682b957b0002e635c205140964bf4fe4    68263e760000b1d7ca24a3b6e5228b03    6532d3ca000df9c53a86ceac009cf030    66b0980f000d86a57d2968aa65dcdf38    63c8b4cd002c26378fd16b9e38d7e5e0    65fdbf8500153d4d1c01a9b6f877732f    6827a2c900045062834c7e844541a87f    682b943c00026e7376917ef3d94dff6c    682b94da0002a34ebc82c11ad099bdbe    68263ed50000d2da0cceaeaefe50d760    682b93e200024c738c45e2d4124a6dd1    682b439e0003f84d4ac7d6ebbbddc1b8    66d75f6000208bd5d2fcb2f570bdfadb    68263c2800003c30

I can't work out how to show different statuses to different groups for the same object - eg a project. As a project moves through different stages, we want to allow different user groups to be able to change the status - but only to statuses visible to that group. eg - to trigger an action in FUSION - that only that group can decide is appropriate. All I can find is that groups can be assigned to an object - and then the statuses available to that group will be available. Which means once I've assigned a project to a group - the statuses will apply to all groups seeing that project. This seems VERY restrictive. Has anyone managed to do something similar ? maybe FUSION changing the group assigned to the project as it progress through the stages ? Thanks in advance as always

Hello!I have a user who I recently had to update their email address. To do that, I had to deactivate him, update the email, then reactivate. In doing that, all the proofs he was a reviewer/approver on show him as (deleted). He can still see that he needs to approve the proofs in the widgets or through the email notifications, but when he tries to open the proof he’s told he doesn’t have access rights. Anyone know a work around? Justin

Hello, I'm having trouble about how the week view in the calendar calculates and displays the duration for multi-day tasks, use custom dates as start date and finish date.I've set up two test schedules with different end times, and they are displayed in a way I did not expect.我很难理解日历中的周视图如何计算和显示多日项目的持续时间。我设置了两个不同结束时间的测试时间表，它们的显示方式出乎我的意料。Test Case 1: Schedule 'Testline2'测试用例1：计划“Testline2”Set Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 9:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 5:00 PM (within the configured working hours).设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日上午9:00至2026年1月22日下午5:00（在配置的工作时间内）。设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日上午9:00至2026年1月22日下午5:00（在配置的工作时间内）。  Expected Display: Should span four days: 19th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd.预计展期：19日、20日、21日、22日四天。Actual Display: In the week view, its bar visually extends to cover Jan 23rd as well, spanning an extra day. Test Case 2: Schedule 'Testlink3' (for comparison) Same date but different end timeSet Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 12:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 11:00 PM.Expected Display: Should also span the same four days.

Hi, I’m having some difficulties determining the best way forward, as the Enhanced Connector appears to have a significant downside: assets must be uploaded to AEM manually. The main challenge is that, in order to upload an asset, users need to navigate through the full folder structure, which is unfamiliar to most Workfront users. On top of that, the volume of assets being created is simply too high to handle through manual uploads, making this approach impractical. Ideally, we’d like to automate this process so that once an asset is approved, it is automatically mapped to a consistent folder (e.g., content/dam/workfront) without requiring manual navigation. We’ve also explored the option of using linked folders, but this approach doesn’t align well with our project structure or data governance model. Our current project has two layers for both product and asset data, structured as follows:Product Code → Product data on taskAsset Created → Asset data on taskAsset Create

Hello, 你好,I'm having trouble understanding how the week view in the calendar calculates and displays the duration for multi-day items. I've set up two test schedules with different end times, and they are displayed in a way I did not expect.我很难理解日历中的周视图如何计算和显示多日项目的持续时间。我设置了两个不同结束时间的测试时间表，它们的显示方式出乎我的意料。Test Case 1: Schedule 'Testline2'测试用例1：计划“Testline2” Set Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 9:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 5:00 PM (within the configured working hours).设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日上午9:00至2026年1月22日下午5:00（在配置的工作时间内）。 Expected Display: Should span four days: 19th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd.预计展期：19日、20日、21日、22日四天。 Actual Display: In the week view, its bar visually extends to cover Jan 23rd as well, spanning an extra day.实际显示：在周视图中，它的栏在视觉上也延伸到1月23日，跨越了额外的一天。 Test Case 2: Schedule 'Testlink3' (for comparison)测试用例2：计划“Testlink3”（用于比较） Set Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 12:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 11:00 PM.设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日，上午12:00至2026年1月22日，晚上11:00。 Expected Display: Should also span the same four days.预期显示

Hello, I have an integration with Azure DevOps that creates Product Backlog Items when a WF Project goes Current.  Context:In the WF Project, there is a parent task named 'MarTech Development,' and varying subtasks underneath it that are all summed up. I can retrieve this information in a GET API Call; part of my QS is:Key: fieldsValue: ID, name, workRequired, plannedStartDateKey: nameMarTech DevelopmentRight after this API Call module, I have a Set Variable module that I reference as 'Planned Hours', with a value that effectively gives me the hours:round(body:data[1]:workRequired/60) I Create a Record (ADO module), set my Dev Hour Estimate='Planned Hours' and voila, my MarTech Task total planned hours is now the same as my PBI Dev Hour Estimate in ADOWhat I want to accomplish:I want a bi-directional communication of Dev Hour Estimates back to my MarTech Task. Assume that I have a link to the PBI and the PBI ID stored in the respective Workfront Project. What I

If you've tried to report on these Billing Record fields and can't, please upvote this idea Billable Hours Billable Expenses Billable Revenues All native fields should be reportable

Is it possible to merge multiple videos into one proof review?

Hello! I’m trying to use logic on custom form but can’t get it to work correctly. I have two fields, both multi select. What I’m trying to do is if an option on the first field is selected, then the second field automatically selects an option. Is that possible?

In reading through some previous questions/answers, I think I'm understanding that the actual pdf proof is compressed or flattened into an image in the proofing tool. This is causing a major issue for us with a company-wide campaign. Our design has layers of transparencies and once it's uploaded into Workfront Proof, that image is altered and looks terrible. That proof, in the proofing tool, is what our end user must approve and it's just not accurate. We spend a tremendous amount of time dealing with this. If you can't view the proof how it's intended to look, then what's the reason for using the proofing tool at all. Does anyone else struggle with this? I would love to hear what your workarounds are. Is there anything we can be doing differently for this to look accurate once uploaded into the proofing tool. Are there settings in the pdf output that our designers should be using to remedy this situation. Is there anything within the our instance that can be changed by Adobe support t

Hi, I went through varies posts from accessRules to EXISTS filter to see if I can find projects where certain groups do not have manage access to the projects. 

A HUGE thank you to ​@SamTaylor for sharing his Fusion expertise and highlighting some of the latest features!  If you weren’t able to attend, a summary, links to the slide deck, recording, and resources are below.Senior Product Manager, Sam Taylor, shared new features, updates, and future roadmap plans. Key topics included design experience enhancements, chained scenarios for reusable logic, alerting/monitoring, event priorities, utilizing technical accounts, instance performance monitoring dashboards (releasing next week), and more. He also shared some upcoming capabilities to improve the developer experience, provide more governance, as well as integrate AI.Slide Deck PDF – there’s a slide of previous Fusion session recordings and other resources at the end! Webinar Recording Resources from the chat: Need a Fusion introduction? Check out this on-demand webinar, Fusion Decoded: What It is and Why Every Org Can Use It  Looking for JSONata examples? Check out the on-demand webinar, Ma